The Tibetan leadership shuts down freedom of speech

Thanks to the heavy handed efforts to the Tibetan leadership, there is no freedom of speech within the Tibetan community. Opinions that diverge from the leadership’s are often heavily and violently suppressed.

The opinion piece below was sent to for publication. We accept submissions from the public, please send in your articles to [email protected].



By: Solaray Kusco

Most people in the modern, Western democratic world take freedom of speech for granted. They wake up each day automatically assuming that it is their right to say, think and publish whatever they feel, and their assumption is supported by a leadership, media and press institution who work hard to protect this. In many other communities around the world however, freedom of speech is not an inalienable right. The people of those nations have their thoughts, true feelings and opinions censored and suppressed, and they are told what and how to think.

This suppression is something that many governments vehemently disagree with, to the point some feel compelled to fund alternative media agencies, and sources of news and information. For example, the BBC (funded by the British public) as well as Radio Free Asia (funded by the American government) broadcast in some of the world’s most war-stricken, disaster-ridden locations where freedom of speech is severely curtailed.

But this suppression however, is not existent in India and other places around the world where the Tibetan people may be found. In India, the world’s largest democracy, freedom of speech is guaranteed; in the USA, Switzerland, Australia, Canada and Western Europe, the Tibetans enjoy the freedom of speech afforded to all citizens and residents of those nations. Having witnessed firsthand how governments protect their citizens’ rights, it is therefore all the more incredible that the Tibetan leadership continues to suppress the freedom of speech of their people.

Since they entered into exile, the Tibetan leadership has accumulated an incredible number of instances whereby they have stymied their people’s freedom of speech. Below are just a handful of significant examples from recent history that are still fresh in our memories, and will help observers realize the true nature of the Tibetan leadership. That is to say, it is not a leadership that was established to preserve the rights and livelihood of their people, or to compel them towards social and economic advancement. It is a leadership that was established to protect the rights of a few, and to ensure that the system of privilege carried out in pre-1959 Tibet would continue on in exile.


Treatment of Lukar Jam

During the 2016 Sikyong elections, Lukar Jam was running as a popular opponent against the incumbent Prime Minister Lobsang Sangay and former Speaker of Parliament Penpa Tsering.

Lukar Jam was especially effective in garnering support among the younger Tibetans. Open-minded and exposed to new ideas, the youth had become jaded by the ruling establishment’s ineffective leadership. Thus they rallied around Lukar Jam’s broad-thinking manifesto which included provisions for a less biased treatment of Dorje Shugden practitioners.

It was this precise manifesto that was deemed traitorous and somehow anti-Dalai Lama, and the Tibetan leadership were swift in their retribution. Not only did they fail to stem the rumor he is anti-Dalai Lama, but they also spoke about it too and promoted the idea. And after the first round of voting had already taken place, the Election Commission was harangued into changing the rules, effectively disqualifying Lukar Jam from the race.

The result of the Tibetan leadership’s sustained campaign to harass Lukar Jam culminated in a violent attack on his car in March 2017.

Lukar Jam’s ideas seemingly challenged the status quo of the establishment, and the Tibetan leadership acted quickly to shut down his platform to speak by removing him as a Sikyong candidate. Since then, the violence against him has not ended. The ‘Lukar Jam is anti-Dalai Lama’ accusation has endured, to the point he and his family were recently the victims of a violent attack on their car.

Interestingly, Lukar Jam was not the only victim of this election. During the campaign, Lobsang Sangay and his only other opponent Penpa Tsering were at extreme odds. They engaged in a level of mud-slinging so previously unheard of, that it even attracted the attention of the New York Times as well as earned them the displeasure of His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Nechung. After Lobsang Sangay won however, Penpa Tsering was conveniently reassigned to the United States as the Dalai Lama’s representative (donjo) and stationed there.

Encouraged by opportunities in America to monopolize the visa-for-money schemes, Penpa Tsering became uncharacteristically quiet after his installation as the donjo. Financial incentives are another method exploited by the Tibetan leadership to suppress freedom of speech. In short, they are not above buying people’s silence.


Removal of open letter from Tibet Sun

Another significant instance of the Tibetan leadership shutting down freedom of speech took place after the passing of the late Professor Elliot Sperling. A renowned Tibetologist and supporter of the so-called Tibetan cause, Professor Sperling had many friends among the Tibetan community, most notably Lukar Jam. Upon his friend’s passing, Lukar Jam penned a poem in his memory. The result however, was less than commemorative.

The original letter before it was removed. Click to enlarge. Extracted from

In his poem, Lukar Jam wished that his friend had lived to 113 years. This was taken by some to be an anti-Dalai Lama statement. Because the Dalai Lama has been saying he will live to 113 years of age, they felt Lukar Jam’s statement meant he wished Professor Sperling had lived to 113 years, instead of the Dalai Lama.

Nowhere did Lukar Jam ever make such a statement and certainly, the ability for someone to live to 113 years is not exclusive to the Dalai Lama. Furthermore, to wish for one’s friends to have a long life is nothing wrong. Yet, Lukar Jam’s critics did not see it this way.

There was an uproar in the Tibetan community after Lukar Jam was accused of making anti-Dalai Lama statements. The protestations came from both the pro-Lukar Jam and anti-Lukar Jam camps. From the anti-Lukar Jam quarters, the Tibetan leadership (led by Lobsang Sangay) saw it fit to use their March 10 memorial celebrations to condemn Lukar Jam. March 10 is one of the most significant days in the Tibetan calendar, commemorating the March 10 uprising in Lhasa back in 1959. On this significant occasion, Lobsang Sangay chose to use his speech to target Lukar Jam.

From the pro-Lukar Jam camp, a significant protest came in the form of a group of 26 Tibetan researchers and students living in exile. They penned an open letter denouncing those who were making false accusations against Lukar Jam. In their fair and broad-minded letter, they explained that it is characteristic of a democratic society to allow people to express different views. They also expressed that suppressing freedom of speech will “impede the overall progress of [a] democratic nation.” Their letter was then posted on Tibet Sun, only to be mysteriously removed a few days later.

This is not the first time articles that are critical of the leadership have been censored by Dharamsala, who have even shut down entire newspapers in the past for daring to present a view that differs from theirs. If pressuring a newspaper to close down is all in a day’s work for them, getting rid of an article from the Internet is child’s play in comparison.


Shut down of Mangtso newspaper

In 1996, renowned essayist Jamyang Norbu was living in Dharamsala where the Tibetan leadership is headquartered. Among his many activities to support the so-called Tibetan cause, Jamyang Norbu was editing the Mangtso newspaper together with a group of friends. Mangtso was known to publish news and present a viewpoint that differed from the establishment’s. Its aim was to widen the Tibetan people’s access to information and different points of view.

An excerpt from the Phayul article regarding the Mangtso newspaper’s closure. Click on the image to read the full article.

Though a brave sentiment, their motivation was ultimately their downfall. No freedom-promoting publication can exist under the tyranny of a leadership with the unsavory habit of censoring their critics. After Mangtso was accused of publishing anti-Dalai Lama and anti-independence statements, its editors and journalists began to receive death threats and threats of violence against them.

These threats grew so violent that eventually, Jamyang Norbu and his friends had no choice but to draw the shutters on the newspaper. The Tibetan leadership had quite literally shut down freedom of speech.


The people’s treatment of Jamyang Norbu

One need only look at some of the online comments made about Jamyang Norbu to imagine the amount of hate against him, all because he sometimes disagrees with the Tibetan leadership. In fact, when a picture of Jamyang Norbu with Dechen Tulku (a prominent Shugden practitioner) was circulated on social media, supporters of the Tibetan leadership were quick to condemn him. They touted the picture as evidence of Jamyang Norbu’s anti-Dalai Lama stance.

Jamyang Norbu issued a strong defence of his actions, saying that simply appearing in pictures with people does not mean you support their views.

Look at the image caption and what the author was trying to imply by Jamyang Norbu appearing in this image with Dechen Tulku, a prominent Shugden practitioner. Jamyang Norbu was targeted and abused for this image; one can only imagine how much abuse he has suffered throughout the years for his published works.

But if merely appearing in a photo of someone could earn him such swift condemnation, imagine the amount of abuse he has had to put up with over the years for running Mangtso, as well as all the other articles he has written which were critical of the Tibetan leadership.

Today, Jamyang Norbu lives in the United States where he has the freedom of speech to write and publish whatever he wants on his blog. As a writer and journalist, there is no doubt he would relish the opportunity in the US to freely speak his mind but as a Tibetan, one can safely assume he would rather be able to exercise this freedom in Dharamsala among the rest of his compatriots. To do so however, with the current Tibetan leadership in place, would never be safe given the leadership’s penchant for shutting down freedom of speech.


Hit lists to intimidate people into silence

We have seen how the Tibetan leadership will buy their rivals’ silence (Penpa Tsering), orchestrate their marginalization (Lukar Jam) and literally shut down proponents of freedom of speech (Mangtso newspaper). There should be little surprise therefore, that they would resort to using violence.

In 2014, Dorje Shugden practitioners gathered at various locations across the United States and Europe to protest against the Dorje Shugden ban. Wherever His Holiness the Dalai Lama went to give a talk, the protestors would be there to speak up for their religious freedoms. The reception that the Tibetan leadership gave them was, suffice to say, less than welcoming.

The Tibetan leadership’s version of freedom of speech. This is how the Tibetan leadership dealt with Shugden protesters in Europe. They erected large black banners so the protesters and their signs would be blocked from the view of people attending the Dalai Lama’s talks.

In some locations, the Tibetan leadership erected large banners to block the protestors from being seen by the media or by those attending the Dalai Lama’s talks. In other locations, the leadership’s supporters were photographed showing rude and vulgar signs to the Shugden protestors. The worst however, was yet to come.

A few weeks after their protests, the Tibetan leadership issued two hit lists with the faces, names and details of some Tibetans who protested. In the case of one lady, they even listed her home address. The intent was clearly to let people know where they could direct their violent displeasure towards. On these lists were only Tibetans who protested against the ban; they did not include any Western faces even though it was the UK-based International Shugden Community (ISC) who had organized the protests.

Despite the fact the majority of the protesters were Caucasian and the organizers came from the UK-based International Shugden Community (ISC), not a single ISC member was targeted in the Tibetan leadership’s hit list. They only targeted and identified their own people, as these Westerners are protected by governments who fund the Tibetan leadership.

The message is clear – the Tibetan leadership has zero tolerance for any dissent or differing views from their own people. If these views are shared by Westerners however, the leadership will turn a blind eye. After all, featuring Westerners on these types of hit lists is not good public relations and these Westerners are citizens of nations with governments who direct financial aid to the Tibetan leadership. These governments would not be very happy if their people appeared on hit lists simply for speaking their mind. But to target and attack Tibetan protestors is okay, because it is acceptable to shut down the freedom of speech of their own people.


Alternative hit list of rangzen people

It appears that in fact, no one is immune from the Tibetan leadership’s love of hit lists. In 2015, after the March 10 rangzen (independence) versus umaylam (Middle Way Approach) clashes in New York, the following hit list appeared online in the days after the fight.

The issue started because a number of rangzen supporters had turned up at the annual March 10 commemorative rallies. Their call was for a fully free and independent Tibet, contrary to the Dalai Lama’s umaylam or Middle Way Approach for meaningful autonomy. Their call was therefore interpreted as being anti-Tibet and anti-Dalai Lama, an accusation which hurt a great number of rangzen supporters who are very devoted to Tibet and the Dalai Lama.

Tibetan community leaders who support rangzen (full independence) were immediately targeted in this hit list released a few days after the clashes with supporters of the Dalai Lama’s umaylam (Middle Way Approach) stance. The headline is the very ominous “Dalai Lama will be watching you guys”.

And as a result of their perceived audacity to withhold support for the Dalai Lama’s choice, the rangzen protestors also had the distinction of being included in the next hit list. This list identified the specific community leaders as being pro-rangzen and implied they are anti-Dalai Lama. The hit list was then widely circulated among the Tibetan community and social media. Throughout this incident, the Tibetan leadership remained quiet. This was a clear message from the Tibetan leadership – they will only support umaylam and nothing else, and everyone else is left to fend for themselves.

The Dalai Lama’s name was even pulled into this list, in the form of the veiled threat “Dalai Lama will be watching you guys”. It was a warning to them to be careful as there are consequences for going against the Dalai Lama. This is the same situation faced by Dorje Shugden practitioners who are considered anti-Dalai Lama, and have had to suffer the violent consequences of being perceived as such over the last 20 years. On any topic, whether it is Shugden or the so-called Tibetan cause, there is no room for views that differ from the Tibetan leadership’s and it will always be a very dangerous thing to be perceived as anti-Tibetan leadership.


Forcing people to move away

In fact, Dorje Shugden practitioners have never been able to speak their mind or practice freely since the Tibetan leadership’s ban of the practice was imposed in 1996. Over and over again, Dorje Shugden practitioners have been forced to move from their homes and leave behind everything they own. The fact someone’s address can be included on a hit list only reflects one thing – the Tibetan leadership want to direct a mob against that person, to harass them out of their homes.

This is a tactic that they are certainly very familiar with; in 1997, the Tibetan leadership incited a mob to riot against Dokhang Khangtsen of Gaden Shartse Monastery. A khangtsen is a fraternity house within a monastery, where monks from the same region in Tibet will live, study and practice together. This mob action eventually drove Dokhang Khangtsen to split from Gaden Shartse Monastery, and to form an entirely new monastery altogether, known as Shar Gaden Monastery to preserve and protect their Dorje Shugden practice.

During the riot, the Indian police had to be called in to protect the peaceful monks from the vicious mob.

For example, His Holiness Kyabje Yongyal Rinpoche was forced from his home in the middle of the night after his ‘students’ threw rocks at his windows. With the threat of violence in Sera Mey increasing against him, Yongyal Rinpoche had no choice but to leave. He subsequently left for Australia where he was again harassed by the Tibetan community there. The community supported the Dalai Lama and Tibetan leadership in their Dorje Shugden ban, and they created visa-related issues for him.

Kyabje Yongyal Rinpoche was subsequently forced to leave Australia and seek refuge in Taiwan where, yet again, the Tibetan community continued to harass him for refusing to give up his Dorje Shugden practice. This elderly lama was unable to live in peace until he arrived in America, where he can finally live a quiet and private existence in California. A true shame for such a grand and scholarly master with much to share and contribute to the rest of the community.

And Kyabje Yongyal Rinpoche is not the only elderly lama who has been targeted and attacked. In 2013, the 84 year old Gen Chonze was viciously stabbed in the early hours of the morning by five masked assailants. The attack came following a speech given by the Tibetan leadership.

In 2013, 84 year old Gen Chonze was viciously stabbed multiple times by masked assailants. The attack came immediately after a speech by the Tibetan leadership against the Dorje Shugden practice.

Who would have spurred the people to attack these elderly lamas, if it was not the Tibetan leadership? Would the Tibetan leadership really have us believe that Tibetans all over the world are subscribed to the same brand of mindless violence targeted against elderly monks who want to exercise their religious freedom? We do not think the Tibetan public would do this; in fact, we have more faith in the Tibetan public than their leadership does, and believe the Tibetan public have the capacity to think. They would never have committed these atrocities against the elderly unless they were incited by their leadership.

The purpose of forcing someone from their home repeatedly is designed to remove them from their bases of support where their views may be able to gain strength. By forcing Kyabje Yongyal Rinpoche, for example, to move over and over again, they prevented him from influencing the local Tibetans in the area. He was thus unable to show them, through reasoning and logic, why the Dorje Shugden ban is illogical.

The Tibetan leadership however, suffers from severe tunnel vision because thanks to their inefficacy, they have become reliant on handouts. Over the last 60 years, they have become increasingly beholden to the generosity of their benefactors; when their benefactors say “Jump”, the leadership can only reply “How high?”. What they do not realize is that the world has changed and news of their crimes against the Tibetan people cannot be stopped.

While they might be able to censor what news reaches their own people, they cannot censor what reaches the far corners of the globe. For the sake of continuing to receive financial contributors from generous donors, it would behoove them to stop thinking about censoring Tibetans and realize that the whole world is watching through the Internet. For every Tibetan’s freedom of speech that they censor, that is one less supporter (and source of income) they will have from the rest of the world.


Name-calling and black-listing those who disagree

Anyone who dares to show any form of disagreement with the Tibetan leadership is often subjected to a litany of names, abuses and insults. These insults range anywhere from “CCP traitor” and “Chinese dog”, to extreme vulgarities that are not suitable for print.

In all instances, the abuse is personal, irrelevant to the topic and designed to shame, defame, blacklist and stain the reputation of the victim. And in certain special cases, the abuse is designed to annihilate the credibility of the victim.

An eloquent speaker and accomplished scholar, His Eminence Kundeling Rinpoche is very much a qualified teacher. Unfortunately, the Tibetan community have not been able to connect with him thanks to their leadership's sustained campaign of defamation against this lama.

An eloquent speaker and accomplished scholar, His Eminence Kundeling Rinpoche is very much a qualified teacher. Unfortunately, the Tibetan community have not been able to connect with him thanks to their leadership’s sustained campaign of defamation against this lama.

Take His Eminence Kundeling Rinpoche for example. In early 2008, he very bravely brought a legal suit against His Holiness the Dalai Lama, stating that the Dalai Lama had violated human rights by enforcing the Dorje Shugden ban. As a result of this case, Kundeling Rinpoche has since been called “Nga Lama”, an epithet implying he is a self-recognized tulku or reincarnated lama. This of course, is not true and Kundeling Rinpoche was recognized by the proper authorities but by calling him “Nga Lama”, the Tibetan leadership and their supporters are labelling him a charlatan whose words have no credibility.

Another major victim of Dharamsala’s sustained campaign to insult and defame is none other than His Eminence Gangchen Rinpoche. Gangchen Rinpoche is a renowned healer and lineage holder of the NgalSo line of tantric self-healing teachings. In the late 1990s, Gangchen Rinpoche filmed a self-healing ritual involving the use of candles and light which the Tibetan leadership then seized and purposefully misinterpreted.

Or watch on server | download video (right click & save file)

At the time, the Tibetan leadership had an entire section of their website dedicated to defaming Gangchen Rinpoche. On this website, they extracted segments of Gangchen Rinpoche’s healing video and uploaded them without any accompanying explanation. The extracts served to mock Gangchen Rinpoche as a teacher of strange practices to unsuspecting victims. That the Tibetan leadership would go so far as to mock an entire tantric lineage in order to accomplish their secular goals, is not a surprise to anyone who has knowledge of how they deal with dissent.

Over the years, the Tibetan leadership have also systematically accused Gangchen Rinpoche of being a Chinese-paid spy and of being a traitor to the so-called Tibetan cause. Instead of promoting his other works and bolstering his ability to benefit sentient beings, this is how the Tibetan leadership has treated a lama simply because he refused to toe their party line of giving up Dorje Shugden practice. Yes, to try and shut down his freedom of speech, the Tibetan leadership have been at the forefront of abusing this lama (and many others) over the last two decades.


Jonangpas forced to go on hunger strike to get parliamentary representation

Within the Tibetan Parliament-in-Exile (TPiE), all Buddhist traditions have their representatives elected to the Parliament to ensure that their interests are represented. This means that within the TPiE, the Gelugs, Sakyas, Nyingmas and Kagyus have their representatives. The Bonpos are also represented, with two elected members taking their seats.

A notable omission to this system however, are the Jonangpas who were recognized as a Buddhist sect in 2011. Their recognition came after centuries of oppression which began during the time of the 5th Dalai Lama, when the Jonangpas were forcibly converted to the Gelug school of Buddhism.

The Jonangpas protesting outside the Tibetan Parliament, to get equal representation. Separately, they also organized a hunger strike for this purpose.

Despite their recognition as a Buddhist sect, the Jonangpas do not have their representatives in the TPiE. To make matters worse, in 2015, the Tibetan Parliament voted against giving them equal representation. This vote led to the Jonangpas protesting in front of Parliament and going on a hunger strike against their own government. The fact that the TPiE voted against someone having equal representation is the clearest sign that the Tibetan leadership shuts down freedom of speech, and has absolutely no intention of building a government that serves the people.


TCV students being questioned

In 2014, the Sikyong Lobsang Sangay visited the TCV School in Dharamsala where he held a public forum with the students. A number of students stood up and politely questioned Lobsang Sangay on the validity of the Dorje Shugden ban. Visibly angered by their questioning, Sikyong Lobsang Sangay’s face immediately darkened and he refused to provide direct and clear answers.

Or watch on server | download video (right click & save file)

Days later, it was revealed that not only had Lobsang Sangay failed to adequately answer their questions, but he had also arranged for them to be questioned. It transpired that the students were questioned about their reasons for asking about the Dorje Shugden ban. It seems Lobsang Sangay was unable to fathom why anyone, let alone children, would question the leadership. Compare this to, say, former President Barack Obama who took questions from all quarters of society and even educated his audience on the merits of freedom of speech if they tried to boo down any anti-Obama hecklers.

title=”Can you imagine Barack Obama staring at someone like this when they dare to ask a question? Sikyong Lobsang Sangay was not happy when the youths questioned the Dorje Shugden ban.

In the Tibetan community however, intelligent, observant school-aged children who had the opportunity to address their leader were interrogated by the authorities simply for asking questions. The end result will surely be a generation of children who are too scared in the future to ask any questions of their leadership, no matter how benign their queries or intention. This entire incident can be interpreted in two ways – the Tibetan leadership can be intimidated by questions from school-going children, and the Tibetan leadership is not above threatening and intimidating children to shut down their freedom of speech.


Phukhang Khangtsen expels a monk

In December 2016, WeChat was abuzz with news that a monk from Gaden Shartse Monastery had been expelled for supposedly speaking out against the Dalai Lama. The incident took place after the Dalai Lama’s speech in Bodhgaya during the Kalachakra initiations. A Geshe of Phukhang Khangtsen in Gaden Shartse Monastery had been so upset with His Holiness’ remarks that he had recorded a series of audio messages critical of His Holiness’ comments. (For reasons of his safety, the Geshe will not be identified here as there are severe and often violent consequences for contradicting the Tibetan leadership.)

The wall in Gaden Shartse Monastery which separates the non-Shugden monks from the Dorje Shugden devotees in Shar Gaden Monastery. After the ban was first implemented in 1996, and was further enforced in 2008, the Shugden monks were expelled from Shartse and a wall was built to divide the monastery in two. It seems that in this day and age, Dharamsala has not yet finished with their campaign to expel monks.

In his audio, the Geshe said that the Dalai Lama told everyone that if you are a Shugden practitioner and you have even a Nyingma text, Dorje Shugden will harm you for this. The Geshe said that this is not logical and that Domo Geshe Rinpoche, for example, had a Guru Rinpoche statue. The meaning was, Domo Geshe Rinpoche had a statue and nothing happened to him so how is it logical that possessing a text would harm someone? The Geshe’s remarks were direct and not rude, but they were spoken with the air of someone who was very frustrated with a lot of pent-up energy that was all being let out now.

As ever, the consequence was swift. Rather unsurprisingly, the Tibetan leadership received a copy of this audio message and responded by sending a fax down to Gaden Shartse Monastery. The fax said that the monk was criticizing the Dalai Lama and it applied pressure on the monastery to expel him. After receiving the fax, the Phukhang Khangtsen administrators held a meeting with the Geshe. They asked him to go to Dharamsala to apologize for his remarks but he told them why should he, when he has not done anything wrong? He also asked them to think carefully. He said he did not mind apologizing but would the Tibetan leadership in Dharamsala really accept his apology if he were to go? He did not think so.

Ultimately, left with little choice, Phukhang Khangtsen expelled the monk although he had, as he said, done nothing wrong. He had only spoken to his mind and commented on the Dalai Lama’s remarks, but this had been severe enough to earn him an expulsion from the monastery. To this day, the Tibetan leadership continues to expel monks because their opinions do not match the leadership’s.



There is overwhelming evidence of the Tibetan leadership’s crimes against their own people, especially in the matter of freedom of speech. Within the Tibetan community, there is zero tolerance for speaking against or holding opinions that differ from the leadership’s. When anyone is caught doing so, no matter how small the infraction or how mundane the remarks, the Tibetan leadership’s heavy handed brand of so-called ‘justice’ is applied very quickly and violently.

It is precisely this intolerance for different ideas and opinions that has led the Tibetan leadership to the quagmire it finds itself in today. After 60 years of exile, so little has been achieved for the Tibetans socially, economically and politically because the leadership is deathly afraid of new ideas. By clamping down on freedom of speech, the leadership makes their people afraid to speak up and Dharamsala’s actions leave no room for innovative ideas and opinions from intelligent, educated and open-minded Tibetans. Everything that does not protect the old guard is thrown out, along with the people who dare to say it.

But by ignoring the opinions of thinkers like Jamyang Norbu or Lukar Jam, and by marginalizing them, the Tibetan leadership operates with their blinders on. Unable to see the world beyond their noses, they keep repeating the same mistakes over and over again while the world around them changes. The world today is not the world of 1959 when the Tibetans first entered exile; people today are more exposed, have access to more knowledge to make different choices, and have more opportunities to move away from things they do not like. They know more about the Tibetan leadership, community and cause than what the people of 1959 knew, meaning they have more information to decide if this is really where they want to their put money to.

So if the Tibetan leadership keeps this up, their community and their cause is doomed to failure. As their crimes are increasingly exposed, over time the leadership will find their support base dwindling until finally, there is none. No one wants to see their money being used to support and fund a group of despots who do everything they can to violate the fundamental human rights of their people.

Thus clamping down on freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of expression is not how the Tibetan community will improve and grow. So while there is much hope that the Tibetan leadership will eventually realize this for their people’s welfare, after 60 years both time and hope are fast running out.

Please support this website by making a donation.
Your contribution goes towards supporting
our work to spread Dorje Shugden across the world.
Share this article
31 total comments on this postSubmit yours
  1. Very well written article that summarizes and highlights the damaging shenanigans of the Tibetan leadership. It is the way they operate to eliminate all opposition and silence those who oppose them. You see they work for only one reason-MONEY. They are only interested in financial gain and holding power over the people and permitting the myth they are suffering so much in exile is their meal ticket to getting more money and continuing the good life. Most of the Tibetan leadership have dual passports meaning refugee papers to remain in India and citizenship in another country such as Japan, Australia, Switzerland, UK, USA and so forth. They are ready to escape to another country away from India the minute the Dalai Lama is no more while for the time being amass as much money as possible.

    They will eliminate any opposition to their rule. They will smear the names of people on the internet, hire foreign help to spread rumours, write books against people, pass out printed pamphlets, create websites and so forth and even discriminate against religion. Now the new PERSECUTED people are the Rangzen (people wishing for full independence of Tibet and against the middle way approach-autonomy) in Dharamsala, the headquarters of the Dalai Lama in North India. Rangzen people’s children are being expelled from Tibetan schools, discourage to go into Tibetan shops/restaurants and public gatherings. This trend is growing. Exactly what the Tibetan leadership did to the Shugden people.

    CTA or Tibetan govt in exile is a danger to it’s own people and as long as it is existing, Tibetans and their culture and religion is in deep danger. Articles like this expose the cunning money machine of the CTA.

  2. @ Carole McQuirre

    Very well said. I couldn’t agree more. They approached me to do their dirty internet works and for a while I was for it but I had to stop and continue with my studies. My name is being dragged through the dirt fulfilling the greedy wishes of Dharamsala and their made up enemies.

  3. The video of Dalai Lama saying his gurus are wrong is shockingly rude. He looks really angry in the video. He is a man of compassion and emanation of the Buddha of love and compassion, so why so angry? If his gurus can be wrong as the Dalai Lama states, that means all gurus can be wrong. If all gurus can be wrong, then the Dalai Lama himself can be wrong too. After all he sets the stage no one is above mistakes. So the Dalai Lama’s words and decisions can be wrong and can be doubted.

  4. Fact is fact. Papers can’t cover fire. Those videos are as evidence CTA are literally not telling truth and answers are not containable to the questions. It very sad to see in one of the video that lay people were forced and PAID to attack monastery and monks that practices Dorje Shugden. Innocence was forced into violence truly heartbreaking especially in spirituality path. Why CTA created such act? How will they politically win their people trust and support with much prove and evidence against them?
    Times bygone, CTA should be awake and make acceptance of their people point view. Be friends with bothering countries and show respect people with their religious choice.

  5. Utterly astonishing to read and watch the heavy-handed methods used by CTA/Dharamsala to suppress freedom of speech. It is even harder to believe that in modern days and age, this leadership not only refuse to open up and listen to voices of criticism, it literally deploy dirty techniques to silence them.

    How is suppressing freedom of speech enshrining Buddha’s teaching? How is suppressing the freedom of speech a sign of democracy? And how can suppressing freedom of speech going to help the image of Dharamsala, Dalai Lama, and CTA?

    The only plausible conclusion would be that the CTA & Dharamsala is a tyrannic absolutism leadership that, like many in the course of history, demand absolute obedience, extract wealth from the people, and give nothing back to the people.

    The saddest part of it all, is that the King of Buddhism is the head of this tragedy.

  6. This is how the CTA or Tibetan government work and that’s why we never see any improvement since they move to India. They even suppressed their own people whoever go against them and with this attitude they will never move to anywhere and not even stagnant but stay backward. The attitude of the leadership is only crushing their people and nothing positive in term of securing or protecting or even uniting their people to with open mind to make a different to benefit their own Tibetan. Instead we only keep hearing how Tibetan leaders attack their own people. The truth is keep revealing and the world is keep watching how CTA going to survive with such attitude.

    With HH the Dalai Lama can even said his gurus can be wrong is really a shock statement where the practice of devotion is being question. With such statement how can we believe HH is right where HH guru also can be wrong. I’m not challenging here but just questioning the logic behind the statement.

    I can’t see the future of Tibetan with such government. May we see more realisation from them and what concern here is the next development of the next generation of Tibetan.

  7. Thank goodness for the internet and massive social media! Because of it, people learn, question, study and become wiser. The older generation of the Tibetans do not have the luxury though, hence I dare say that most of them were ‘brainwashed’ and intimidated by whatever HHDL and CTA say. No questions asked, why? Because if you do, you will be ‘shot’ down. So fast that you won’t even know what happened. No democracy only pure selfishness. A ‘government’ using fear tactic to govern its own people. How scary!

    Look at the younger generation, the smarter ones. Don’t forget that we have a brain to think and eyes to see. CTA keep denying this and that but in time, people catch on. You can’t cover a lie with another and another, it will just blow up one day, and in your face. If only the CTA open its eyes and heart for their own, I believe they will be a better ‘government’ and maybe more good things will happen.

  8. I’ve heard from many reliable sources of the draconian rules and laws by the Tibetan government in exile, clamping down and muting speeches from Tibetans who asked clarifying questions and voicing their opinions, especially related to political and religious matters. CTA made no sincere efforts to meet their own people to talk things over or to placate Tibetans over their displeasures. However, CTA sent their people to tell their supporters to voice their want for autonomy, and when hundreds of Tibetans self immolated over the years, CTA did not strongly tell Tibetans to stop doing this suicidal act which is against the teachings of the Buddha. Instead CTA praised those who died and sort of recognised the dead as heroic martyrs. Efforts from Dorje Shugden practitioners asking to have dialogues with the Tibetan leadership fell on deaf ears. Yet CTA expected China to meet them to listen and bargain for their demands. Ridiculous.

  9. I like the new age of Tibetan Youth thinking, they’re telling the truth. And thanks we had social media that we can read more and understand more, we don’t blindly follow what our Government said.

    The video started from 12:00 mins – recommend to all –

  10. HH the Dalai Lama declared democracy for Tibetans in 1960 And a constitution named “The Charter of Tibetans in-Exile” enshrines freedom of speech, belief, assembly and movement, which form the basic essential foundations of a democratic society.

    However the incidents mentioned in the articles obviously are not only undemocratic but will jeopardize the democratic process. For a healthy development a society or country, it is always healthy to engage in debate and listen to different opinions. However Tibetan leadership ignore the democratic process and their result for the last 60 years already a good indication about the level of their democracy system. Suppressed the media, threatening the school children, tendency of using HH the Dalai Lama to put down the political opponents and win political arguments, and the worst using religious as political tools are just making the situation worst and hopeless. Hope the CTA will realised these and focus on bringing benefit to his peoples.

  11. This has been the chase all along in my honest opinion. This is how they suppress the minority group deprived of the right to voice out their opinion or basically freedom of speech. I remember watching the video of Lobsang Sangay reacting angrily to the students questioning CTA’s stance on Dorje Shugden and discrimination against Shugdenpas. For CTA, whoever does things not in accordance with them, they will be deemed as going against the Dalai Lama hence receiving harsh treatments from staunch followers of CTA.

    What I found baffling is that even Dalai Lama is saying something illogical. He was seen in the video saying his Gurus can be wrong and it is really shocking especially in Tibetan Buddhist world where Guru Devotion is the prime practice. CTA can’t be bothered simply. Reading all the accounts from people who were banished or harmed, there is simply no freedom of speech in CTA’s eyes.

  12. Oh my Buddha…. Look at that fella’s face when he was asked about the validity of Dorje Shugden ban. Is that how a country leader react when being asked question like that? Besides being asked question and react with face like that, latter he questioned back the students and interrogate the students. Is this what a country leader does to their people? CTA, self claimed democratic, didn’t protect Tibetan in exile welfare, didn’t preserve their culture, yet, rip off the freedom of speech, apply pressure to people who don’t support them, give them names, discriminate them, accuse them by saying they anti Dalai Lama, accuse them by saying they are China cult, pressure the people until they are scared of the so called government so that they’ll boycott these people. What kind of “government” is this? First thing came to my mind, “Are they even Buddhist? They called themselves Buddhist??” Poor Tibetan in exile, they can only follow. If they don’t follow, the result will be like Lukar Jem, Jamyang Nobu, Kyabje Yongyal Rinpoche and all the Dorje Shugden practitioners. Come on CTA…. You have other better things to do than being so petty. Where is the money from other country that you are suppose to use it to help your people? All CTA know and all CTA does is nothing but discriminate, accuse good people, blacklist their people, ban Dorje Shugden, support self immolation, what else do you know CTA?

  13. I always found baffling and illogical Tibetan leadership when talk about Dorje Shugden practice has bring harm to his government and people. Instate of allowing religion practice freedom. H.H.Dalai Lama with his exile govornment has put down the ban hashly toward Shugden practitioner. Which breaking Tibetan apart, create more doubt , dispoinment and lose hope and respect what H.Holiness has done. If H.H. Dalai Lama not even can accept with his own Tibetan and other believe, Then how can accept other beliave.

    CTA has suppress people from the speech with their opinion even at own palimen, what kind of democracy when people sincere speech and question, then they get attack and jailed. Look at the Lobsang Sangye get question by student about Dorje Shugden issue, his twice the thruth and respond to their young generation of Tibetan. I felt sad how the student live at this situation and feel hopeless for Tibetan future.

    done tremendous

  14. I have no surprise when i came across this title “Tibetan leadership shuts down freedom of speech”, what else can the CTA do? They are really good at suppressing their own people, just like Lukar Jam, he is out spoken, but he did not speak with ill intention towards the government or to the Dalai Lama, look at what CTA did to him, and call him traitor who betrayed Dalai Lama, CTA is operating with such narrow minded, how can he bring back Tibet and bring happiness to their citizen.

  15. It is scary and worrisome when a government has total control of what can and cannot happens within a country and worse if one country can hold hand with another country with the same “motivation” to do something big for the sake of the benefits for themselves.

    For some individuals within the in-group they are located by the government in the shaded spot where they could never see things that happening within themselves clearly and rationally. However,sometimes for the individuals from the out-group they are able see things from a clearer and rational point of view in an issue.

    We should always keep our minds open, listen, accept and examine comments and ideas from another to improve and become a better person.

  16. I must confess that it is for me exactly as written above: “Most people in the modern, Western democratic world take freedom of speech for granted. They wake up each day automatically assuming that it is their right to say, think and publish whatever they feel, and their assumption is supported by a leadership, media and press institution who work hard to protect this.”

    But this is only because this freedom was granted since my childhood. Tibetan people don’t have this luxury and they know they cannot just simply do what they want or befriend who they want.

    We must speak up and tell the CTA and people who do not respect the freedom of speech and freedom of religion and freedom altogether. This is our responsibility as many people suffer from this suppression and are not allowed to express their humanity like it should.

    Thanks for this article! I hope this situation will end soon and everyone can be free to say whatever they want. Dorje Shugden practitioners are sufferings for twenty years and are suppressed and punished by the Tibetan leaders. This should not happen and we need to let everyone know what the CTA does to his people.

  17. I really pity the Tibetans in exile. They really do not have their freedom of speech like other places or countries. Once said anything about anti-Dalai Lama or Dorje Shugden, they will be hunted down by the CTA. The Tibetans in exile’s feelings or emotion is FEAR. They fear that they will be punished / threaten if said or do anything against the CTA. But this group of people have fear is because they are being fed stories by the CTA. They are also not exposed to the outside world and news like the younger generations. Why CTA want to punish people for saying the wrong things? They should admit their faults.

  18. no

  19. I am not surprised the lack of democracy by the CTA.

    What I am surprised is that America and many Western governments are still giving handouts to CTA. CTA has not demonstrated that it really fights for the people, and brings them lasting benefit. In many cases they are only interested in holding on to power and many cases they even create endless problems for the Tibetans.

  20. This clear video shows His Holiness the Dalai Lama asking the monasteries to expel monks that practice Dorje Shugden. Click here to watch:

  21. Member of Parliament Tenpa Yarphel is a hero. He is speaking up for free speech and freedom of expression. He is exercising his rights, he is standing up for logical democracy which is the only way forward and not having to contact spirits like Nechung via oracles to make decisions that impact people’s lives. But look how people speak about him in the comments, so rude and nasty. It really represents the Dalai Lama badly as they are supporting Dalai Lama beings so rude:

    They say we need to believe in Nechung and follow what he says. But in 2009 Nechung said the Dalai Lama would go back to Tibet and that everyone would be happy. A monk from Nechung Monastery is the one that told everyone about this: But Nechung was wrong. It has been eight years and this has not happened. The Dalai Lama did not return to Tibet. Nechung being consulted by Tibetan government in exile is backwards. No governments do this in the civilized world.

    When people like Tenpa Yarphel speak up and are real patriots of the Tibetan people, they are attacked by other people. In fact people even protest like this man who shaves his hair: People like these are actually protesting against Tenpa Yarphel’s democratic rights and freedom of speech. Tibetans by criticizing Tenpa Yarphel shows they are far from democracy. Besides many of the other Kagyu leaders such as Drigung Chetsang Rinpoche, Drukchen Rinpoche, Karmapa Thaye Dorje all did not say anything against Tenpa Yarphel that represents the Kagyus.

    Dalai Lama had said that is his minister of cabinet in the government. Even though it is clear that Nechung is unreliable and a spirit, the Dalai Lama continues to rely heavily on Nechung and other oracles who take trance of spirits. He invites Nechung to all his events and allow him to take trance in centre stage always. In fact the Dalai Lama even calls the oracles to his own private bedroom:

    These practices show how Tibetan government is run.

  22. Another proof that the CTA is not capable of planting the seed of real democracy where freedom of speech, differences in opinion, and constructive feedback can be accepted. Tenpa Yarphel is being called a Chinese dog just because he said Nechung’s prophecy is inaccurate.


  23. What is the CTA for a club? Going around pretending to be a democracy and only because of HH Dalai Lama they can make some foreign people believe it but it seems that karma is coming back.

    The CTA is suppressing its own people and is having a good life with the money originally meant for the Tibetan people. On top, their elections are a farce!

    Listen here to Tenpa Yarphel who questions about the reliance of the Tibetan Government to Nechung, an oracle, which is understandable already but on top Nechung’s predictions seem to create more problems than anything else.

    What happens to Tenpa Yarphel now that he speaks up? Tibetans have started a Facebook page against Tenpa Yarphel and protest against him: They even ask him to resign:

    So much for the “Democracy” in the Tibetan Government!!

  24. Nechung is ZUMA 👎 before I m think he is one of d best when I m watch dis video By Geshe Dorjee la but now I m think is not d truth n he is lie to Tibet people we r not back to Tibet yt Chithue Tenpa Yarphel la tq for talk about truth of Nechung . I m watch to this video many time la n after I hear you talk I m not belief to Nechung

  25. What will the all the people around the world and in Tibet do now? Dalai Lama says he is happy that Tibet is a part of China and should remain a part of China. So many Tibetans self-immolated for Tibet to be independent and now Dalai Lama did a 360 degree turn and says he wants to go back to Tibet and China and Tibet should be a part of China. So unbelievable. So many are angry and disappointed.

    Tibetans ready to be part of China: Dalai Lama
    Organised by the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), the event was a part of “Thank You India – 2018″ held by the Tibetan community across India to mark 60 years of its exile in the country.
    Indo-Asian News Service
    Tibetans are ready to be a part of China if guaranteed full rights to preserve their culture, the Dalai Lama said on Friday.
    “Tibetans are not asking for independence. We are okay with remaining with the People’s Republic of China, provided we have full rights to preserve our culture,” the 83-year-old spiritual leader said at “Thank You Karnataka” event here in the city.
    Organised by the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA), the event was a part of “Thank You India – 2018″ held by the Tibetan community across India to mark 60 years of its exile in the country.
    “Several of Chinese citizens practicing Buddhism are keen on Tibetan Buddhism as it is considered scientific,” the Nobel laureate said.
    Born in Taktser hamlet in northeastern Tibet, the Dalai Lama was recognized at the age of two as the reincarnation of the 13th Dalai Lama, Thubten Gyatso. He fled to India from Tibet after a failed uprising against the Chinese rule in 1959.
    China annexed Tibet in 1950, forcing thousands of Tibetans, including monks, to flee the mountain country and settle in India as refugees.
    Since then, India has been home to over 100,000 Tibetans majorly settled in Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh among other states.


  26. Dear Dalai Lama,

    Since you started the cruel ban against the 350 year Dorje Shugden practice, how has it benefit your Tibetan society and Buddhism in the world? Things have become worse and most educated Tibetans can see this. They don’t speak out not because they don’t see your ban as wrong, but you instill fear in them and not respect. It is like fear of a dictator. I am sorry to say so. Everyone is divided. There is no harmony. Before your ban there was more harmony and unity.

    By enacting the ban, you split the monasteries, split so many families, split regions in Tibet apart, split your disciples from you, split your own gurus from you, split Tibetan Buddhism apart. You have created so much disharmony.

    It is not democratic what you have done to ban a religion within your community. You always talk of tolerance and acceptance and democracy and yet you do not accept and tolerate something different from your beliefs. When people practice Dorje Shugden you ostracize them, ban them from seeing you, ban them from using Tibetan facilities. You know you have done that. There are videos that capture your speech and prove this point. You even had people expelled from monasteries just because they practice Dorje Shugden. Some of the monks you expelled have been in the monastery for over 40 years. Many older monks shed tears because of this.

    Many young educated Tibetans lost confidence in you as they saw the damage the Dorje Shugden ban created and they lose hope. Many have become free thinkers. They reject what you have done. So many people in the west left Buddhism because of the confusion you created with this ban against Dorje Shugden which is immoral.

    You could of had millions of people who practice Dorje Shugden to support, love and follow you, but you scared them away. They are hurt and very disappointed. They loved you and respected you deeply before the ban. It has been 60 years and you have failed to get Tibet back. Your biggest failure is not getting Tibet back after 57 years in exile. Now you are begging China to allow you to return to Tibet to the disappointment of thousands of people who fought for a free Tibet believing in you. So many self-immolated for a free Tibet and now you want Tibet to be a part of China with no referendum from Tibetans. Just like a dictator, you decide on your own. It was your government and you that lost Tibet in the first place. Your policies and style of doing things do not benefit Tibet and Buddhism. You have been the sole ruler of Tibet your whole life and you still have not gotten our country of Tibet back for us. Our families and us are separated. Yet you create more pain by creating a ban to further divide people. Please have compassion.

    No other Buddhist leader has banned or condemned any religion except for you. It looks very bad. You are a Nobel laureate and this is not fitting of a laureate. You should unite people and not separate them by religious differences.

    You said Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi did not do right to the Rohingya people in Myanmar due to religious differences, but you are doing the same thing to the Shugden Buddhists within your own society. There is a parallel in this. You separate the Shugden Buddhists from the others in Tibetan society.

    You have lost so many people who would have loved and supported you. You have lost so much support around the world. The Shugden Buddhists who love you number in the millions. When you are fast losing support from governments and private people, it will not do you well to lose more.

    After you are passed away in the future, the rift you created between the Dorje Shugden and non-Dorje Shugden people will remain for a while and that will be your legacy. Disharmony. You will be remembered for this. Not as a hero but a disharmony creator.

    Dorje Shugden will spread and further grow, but you will be no more as you are a human. No one wishes you bad and in fact we hope you have a long and healthy life, but we have lost so much hope and have so much despair because of you. All the hundreds of Dorje Shugden lamas, tulkus and geshes are maturing and there are hundreds of Dorje Shugden monasteries in Tibet who will not give up Dorje Shugden. You have made a mistake. These hundreds of teachers and teachers to be will spread Dorje Shugden further in the future.

    The gurus that gave us Dorje Shugden as a spiritual practice and you have called these holy gurus wrong and they are mistaken in giving us Dorje Shugden. How can you insult our gurus whom we respect so much? If they can be wrong, then you can be wrong. Then all gurus can be wrong. So no one needs to listen to any guru? You have created this trend. It is not healthy. Your own gurus practiced Dorje Shugden their whole lives. Your own gurus were exemplary and highly learned.

    Dalai Lama you have created so much pain with this ban against so many people due to religion. You are ageing fast. Are you going to do anything about it or stay stubborn, hard and un-moving. You show a smile and preach peace and harmony wherever you go. But will you do the same to your own people? Please rectify the wrong you have done. Please before it is too late. You can create harmony again or you can pass away in the future with this legacy of peace. May you live long and think carefully and admit what was a mistake in having this unethical ban against Dorje Shugden religion.

  27. Why doesn’t the United States and its allies end Refugee Status for the useless Tibetans? They have been refugees for 60 years now and don’t tell me they still cannot get their lives back in order?

    Tibetans really know how to put on a good show and use people, take their money and do nothing in return.

    Trump and Allies Seek End to Refugee Status for Millions of Palestinians
    In internal emails, Jared Kushner advocated a “sincere effort to disrupt” the U.N.’s relief agency for Palestinians.
    Jared Kushner, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior advisor, has quietly been trying to do away with the U.N. relief agency that has provided food and essential services to millions of Palestinian refugees for decades, according to internal emails obtained by Foreign Policy.
    His initiative is part of a broader push by the Trump administration and its allies in Congress to strip these Palestinians of their refugee status in the region and take their issue off the table in negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, according to both American and Palestinian officials. At least two bills now making their way through Congress address the issue.
    Kushner, whom Trump has charged with solving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has been reluctant to speak publicly about any aspect of his Middle East diplomacy. A peace plan he’s been working on with other U.S. officials for some 18 months has been one of Washington’s most closely held documents.
    But his position on the refugee issue and his animus toward the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) is evident in internal emails written by Kushner and others earlier this year.
    “It is important to have an honest and sincere effort to disrupt UNRWA,” Kushner wrote about the agency in one of those emails, dated Jan. 11 and addressed to several other senior officials, including Trump’s Middle East peace envoy, Jason Greenblatt.
    “This [agency] perpetuates a status quo, is corrupt, inefficient and doesn’t help peace,” he wrote.
    The United States has helped fund UNRWA since it was formed in 1949 to provide relief for Palestinians displaced from their homes following the establishment of the State of Israel and ensuing international war. Previous administrations have viewed the agency as a critical contributor to stability in the region.
    But many Israel supporters in the United States today see UNRWA as part of an international infrastructure that has artificially kept the refugee issue alive and kindled hopes among the exiled Palestinians that they might someday return home—a possibility Israel flatly rules out.
    Critics of the agency point in particular to its policy of granting refugee status not just to those who fled Mandatory Palestine 70 years ago but to their descendants as well—accounting that puts the refugee population at around 5 million, nearly one-third of whom live in camps across Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, and Gaza.
    By trying to unwind UNRWA, the Trump administration appears ready to reset the terms of the Palestinian refugee issue in Israel’s favor—as it did on another key issue in December, when Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.
    In the same January email, Kushner wrote: “Our goal can’t be to keep things stable and as they are. … Sometimes you have to strategically risk breaking things in order to get there.”
    Kushner raised the refugee issue with officials in Jordan during a visit to the region in June, along with Special Representative for International Negotiations Jason Greenblatt. According to Palestinian officials, he pressed the Jordan to strip its more than 2 million registered Palestinians of their refugee status so that UNRWA would no longer need to operate there.
    “[Kushner said] the resettlement has to take place in the host countries and these governments can do the job that UNRWA was doing,” said Hanan Ashrawi, a member of Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization.
    She said the Trump administration wanted rich Arab Gulf states to cover the costs Jordan might incur in the process.
    “They want to take a really irresponsible, dangerous decision and the whole region will suffer,” Ashrawi said.
    Saeb Erekat, the Palestinians’ chief negotiator, told reporters in June that Kushner’s delegation had said it was ready to stop funding UNRWA altogether and instead direct the money—$300 million annually—to Jordan and other countries that host Palestinian refugees.
    “All this is actually aimed at liquidating the issue of the Palestinian refugees,” hesaid.
    The White House declined to comment on the record for this story. A senior executive branch official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said U.S. policy regarding the U.N.’s Palestinian refugee program “has been under frequent evaluation and internal discussion. The administration will announce its policy in due course.”
    Jordanian officials in New York and Washington did not respond to queries about the initiative.
    Kushner and Nikki Haley, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, both proposed ending funding for UNRWA back in January. But the State Department, the Pentagon, and the U.S. intelligence community all opposed the idea, fearing in part that it could fuel violence in the region.
    The following week, the State Department announced that that United States would cut the first $125 million installment of its annual payment to UNRWA by more than half, to $60 million.
    “UNRWA has been threatening us for six months that if they don’t get a check they will close schools. Nothing has happened,” Kushner wrote in the same email.
    State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert said at the time that the U.S. had no intention of eliminating funding for Palestinian refugees, and that it was taking time to explore ways to reform UNRWA and to convince other countries to help Washington shoulder the financial burden of aiding the Palestinians.
    But the following day, Victoria Coates, a senior advisor to Greenblatt, sent an email to the White House’s national security staff indicating that the White House was mulling a way to eliminate the U.N.’s agency for Palestinian refugees.
    “UNRWA should come up with a plan to unwind itself and become part of the UNHCR by the time its charter comes up again in 2019,” Coates wrote.
    She noted that the proposal was one of a number of “spitball ideas that I’ve had that are also informed by some thoughts I’ve picked up from Jared, Jason and Nikki.”
    Other ideas included a suggestion that the U.N. relief agency be asked to operate on a month-to-month budget and devise “a plan to remove all anti-Semitism from educational materials.”
    The ideas seemed to track closely with proposals Israel has been making for some time.
    “We believe that UNRWA needs to pass from the world as it is an organization that advocates politically against Israel and perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem,” said Elad Strohmayer, a spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Washington.
    Strohmayer said that Palestinians are the only population that is able to transfer its refugee status down through generations.
    The claim, though long advanced by Israel, is not entirely true.
    In an internal report from 2015, the State Department noted that the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees “recognizes descendants of refugees as refugees for purposes of their operations.” The report, which was recently declassified, said the descendants of Afghan, Bhutanese, Burmese, Somali, and Tibetan refugees are all recognized by the U.N. as refugees themselves.
    Of the roughly 700,000 original Palestinian refugees, only a few tens of thousands are still alive, according to estimates.
    The push to deny the status to most Palestinians refugees is also gaining traction in Congress.
    Last week, Rep. Doug Lamborn, a Republican from Colorado, introduced a bill that would limit the United States to assisting only the original refugees. Most savings in U.N. contributions would be directed to the U.S. Agency for International Development, the United States’ principal international development agency. But USAID is currently constrained by the Taylor Force Act, which restricts the provision of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian Authority until it ends a policy of providing aid to families of fallen terrorists.
    “Instead of resettling Palestinian refugees displaced as a result of the Arab-Israeli Conflict of 1948, UNRWA provides aid to those they define as Palestinian refugees until there is a solution they deem acceptable to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Lamborn’s bill states.
    “This policy does not help resettle the refugees from 1948 but instead maintains a refugee population in perpetuity.”
    A congressional aide familiar with the legislation said its intent isn’t to gut UNRWA funding, but redirect assistance to descendants through USAID.
    “The people that are suffering should still get assistance, but through appropriately defined humanitarian channels and aid programs,” the aide said.
    Similarly, Sen. James Lankford, (R-Okla.), has drafted legislation that would redirect U.S. funding away from UNRWA and to other local and international agencies.
    The bill, which has not yet officially been introduced, would require the U.S. secretary of state certify by 2020 that the United Nations has ended its recognition of Palestinian descendants as refugees.
    “The United Nations should provide assistance to the Palestinians in a way that makes clear that the United Nations does not recognize the vast majority of Palestinians currently registered by UNRWA as refugees deserving refugee status,” reads a draft obtained by Foreign Policy.
    Previous U.S. administrations have maintained that the vast majority of Palestinian refugees will ultimately have to be absorbed in a new Palestinian state or naturalized in the countries that have hosted them for generations.
    But the fate of the refugee issue was expected to be agreed to as part of a comprehensive peace pact that resulted in the establishment of a Palestinian state.
    “It’s very clear that the overarching goal here is to eliminate the Palestinian refugees as an issue by defining them out of existence,” said Lara Friedman, the president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace.
    “This isn’t going to make peace any easier. It’s going to make it harder.” Trump and Allies Seek End to Refugee Status for Millions of Palestinians (1)

  28. Supreme Court of India JUSTICE Mr. MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD) writes that Tibet is much better under the Chinese than it was under the lamas who only wanted to make the populace slaves. It was feudal and it will never return to the backwardness again.

    Time has come to acknowledge that Tibet has vastly improved under Chinese rule
    JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD) | 12 August, 2018
    From a terribly poor state hinged on a feudal system, Tibet has modernised and grows faster than the rest of China
    This article has been prompted by Jyoti Malhotra’s article in ThePrint ‘Tibetan government quietly changed its PM’s designation. India won’t be unhappy about it‘.
    China’s annexation of Tibet in 1959, ousting the Dalai Lama, had attracted it worldwide criticism. The Dalai Lama fled and was granted asylum in India, where he set up a government-in-exile with its headquarters in Dharamshala.
    The Chinese claim Tibet on the grounds that it has been part of the country since the Yuan dynasty of the 13th century, which is disputed by the government-in-exile. But let us leave this that matter aside.
    The more important question is whether Chinese rule has benefited Tibet.
    The answer is that it undoubtedly has. As the Reuters’ Ben Blanchard writes: “Today Tibet is richer and more developed than it has ever been, its people healthier, more literate, better dressed and fed”.
    Although Ben goes on to argue that this development masks “a deep sense of unhappiness among many Tibetans”, I will disagree. How can anyone be unhappy if s/he is healthier, better fed and better clothed?
    Under the rule of the Dalai Lamas (Buddhist priests), the people of Tibet were terribly poor, almost entirely illiterate, and lived like feudal serfs.
    Today, Tibet presents a totally different picture. The illiteracy rate in Tibet has gone down from 95 per cent in the 1950s to 42 per cent in 2000. It has modern schools, universities, engineering and medical colleges, modern hospitals, freeways, supermarkets, fast food restaurants, mobile stores and apartment buildings. The capital Lhasa is like any other modern city.
    While the economic growth in the rest of China has slowed down to about 7 per cent, Tibet has had a 10 per cent growth rate in the last two decades.
    Tibet has huge mineral wealth, which was only awaiting Chinese technology to be tapped. Nowadays, it has numerous hydro and solar power plants and industries running with Chinese help.
    Tibetan literature is flourishing, contrary to claims that the Chinese want to crush Tibetan culture.
    Of course, now the lamas cannot treat their people as slaves.
    The so-called ‘government-in-exile’, of which Lobsang Sangay claims to be the President, is a fake organisation, funded by foreign countries. They only want to restore the feudal Tibet, ruled by the reactionary lamas, something which will never happen.
    The writer is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India

  29. While the government of Nepal has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, they have welcomed 30 Chinese NGOs to enter the country. These NGOs will penetrate the country’s social sector at the grassroots level. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal at one time. Nepal is increasingly open to Chinese influence, a sign that ties between both countries are strengthening, while India’s influence is being reduced. The time has passed for India’s monopoly to remain uninterrupted in Nepal as opportunities to engage with China are being welcomed.

    30 Chinese NGOs all set to work in Nepal
    Kathmandu, July 30
    At a time when the government has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, 30 Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal to penetrate the country’s social sector and the grassroots.
    The Social Welfare Council Nepal and China NGO Network for International Exchanges, an umbrella body of Chinese NGOs, have signed a memorandum of understanding to enable Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal. The agreement was signed yesterday between SWCN Member Secretary Dilli Prasad Bhatt and CNIE General Secretary Zhu Rui in the presence of Minister of Women, Children and Senior Citizen Tham Maya Thapa and Chinese Deputy Minister of External Affairs Wang Yajun.
    The agreement has paved the way for the first batch of 30 Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal for a period of three years. Their contract will be extended based on the consent of SWCN and CNIE. Representatives of these 30 Chinese NGOs were also present during yesterday’s signing ceremony. They have agreed to work in partnership with local NGOs to implement their programmes and projects.
    The Chinese NGOs are eyeing areas such as livelihood, healthcare, education, skill-based training, community development and disaster management. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs has entered Nepal at one time. The Chinese assistance so far in Nepal has largely been limited to development of infrastructure projects. But the entry of these NGOs indicates China is keen on making its presence felt in Nepal’s social sector and the grassroots, which, till date, have remained domains of the West and countries such as Japan and India.
    The MoU signed between SWCN and CNIE states that Chinese NGOs will be mobilised for ‘the benefit of needy Nepalis and to enhance ties between China and Nepal through people-to-people support programmes’.
    “The Chinese NGOs will abide by the law of Nepal in its entirety while carrying out development cooperation in Nepal,” says the MoU, adding, “Chinese NGOs will submit programmes to the SWCN to carry out development activities in partnership with Nepali NGOs and SWCN in line with plans and policies of the government of Nepal.”
    The MoU was signed at a time when the government has drafted the National Integrity Policy to limit activities of NGOs and INGOs, as some of them were found ‘trying to break communal harmony and proselytising Nepalis’. There were also concerns that high administrative cost of many NGOs and INGOs was preventing money from reaching the real beneficiaries. The policy clearly states that NGOs and INGOs cannot spend more than specified amount under administrative and consultant headings. They will also be barred from working against Nepal’s interests, culture and communal harmony and conducting activities to promote their religious, social or other agenda, adds the policy.
    Around 48,000 NGOs are currently registered in Nepal, of which only 1,600 have been receiving funds from INGOs, as per SWCN. The SWCN has directed INGOs and NGOs to spend 60 per cent of the budget to generate tangible results, while the remaining can be used to cover administrative costs and organise training, meetings and seminars.

  30. The cracks in Tibetan society are starting to show, and it is now coming to the attention of local Indians who have all but identified the Tibetan leadership as the source of the divisions. According to this author, disunity amongst the Tibetans is now creating problems for Indian law enforcement agencies, and this disunity may culminate in young Tibetans holding silent grudges against their host country. It is incredible that after six decades of generosity from India, Indians are now facing the very real possibility Tibetans can be ungrateful towards India. The Tibetan leadership totally failed to impart positive values upon their exiled community, like gratitude for those kindest to them and the need to repay these kindnesses with real, tangible results. It’s also very unlikely that the Tibetan leadership will now start to do this, after six decades of failing to do so. Indians need to realise this, and see that there is no benefit for their nation to align themselves with the Tibetan leadership, and there never will be.
    Tibetan disunity not in India’s interest
    John S. Shilshi
    Updated: August 7, 2018, 11:00 AM
    India is home to the Dalai Lama and an estimated 120,000 Tibetan refugees. Though this humanitarian gesture on India’s part comes at the cost of risking New Delhi’s relations with China, India has never wavered in ensuring that Tibetans live with dignity and respect. Notified settlements across the country were made available so that they can live as independently as possible and practice Tibetan religion and culture. They are also allowed to establish centres of higher learning in Tibetan Buddhism. As a result, several reputed Buddhist institutes came up in Karnataka, and in the Indian Himalayan belt. In what may be termed as a gesture well reciprocated, and because of the respect and influence His Holiness the Dalai Lama commands, the Tibetan diaspora also lived as a peaceful community, rarely creating problems for India’s law enforcement agencies.
    The situation, however, changed from 2000 onwards when unity amongst Tibetans suffered some setback due to developments like the Karmapa succession controversy and the controversy over worshiping of Dorje Shugden. In a unique case of politics getting the better of religion, two senior monks of the Karma kargyue sect of Tibetan Buddhism, Tai Situ Rinpoche and late Shamar Rinpoche, developed serious differences after the demise of Rangjung Rigpe Dorje, the 16th Karmapa, in 1981. This animosity ultimately led to emergence of two 17th Karmapa candidates in the early nineties. While Tai Situ Rinpoche identified and recognised UghyanThinley Dorje, late Shamar Rinpoche anointed Thinley Thaye Dorje as his Karmapa candidate. Enthronement of their respective protégés at the Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim, the supreme seat of the Karma Kargue linage, being their primary objective, both started indulging in activities monks normally are expected to, and bitterness spewed against each other.
    The bitter rivalry assumed a new dimension when UghyenThinley Dorje suddenly appeared in India in January 2000. The competition became fiercer and hectic political lobbying, never known in the history of Tibetan Buddhism on Indian soil, became common place. Apart from pulling strings at their disposal in Sikkim as well as in the power corridors of New Delhi, these senior monks spat against each other with allegations and counter allegations, widening the gaps between their supporters. His Holiness the Dalai Lama, choosing to favour one of the candidates—a decision many Tibet watchers felt was ill-timed—had also limited possible scope of rapprochement. Hence, the Karma Kargyue followers are now vertically divided, while the camps are dragged into a long drawn legal battle.
    Another development that unfortunately split the Tibetans is the controversy over Shugden worshipping, which again is an internal matter of the Gelugpa sect, to which the Dalai Lama belongs. It erupted as a result of the Dalai Lama urging Tibetans to refrain from worshiping Dorje Shugden, a deity believed to be a protector, according to Tibetan legend. Shugden practitioners, who felt offended by the call, describe it as an attack on freedom of religion, a right, which Dalai Lama himself tirelessly fought for. On the other hand, die hard Dalai Lama followers perceived the questioning of the decision as one challenging the wisdom of the Dalai Lama and mounted massive pressure on Dorje Shugden practitioners to relent, with some even demolishing the statues of the deity. The rivalry ultimately led to split in two Gelug monasteries in Karnataka, and Serpom and Shar Garden monasteries in Bylakupe and Mundgod respectively came under the control of Shugden followers. The bitterness associated with the split is exemplified by the fact that till today, members of these monasteries are treated as some sort of outcasts by the others. Thus, for the first time, the Tibetan diaspora in India gave birth to sections opposed to the Dalai Lama, with spillover effects in Tibet and elsewhere.
    For India, with a fragile internal security profile, a divided Tibetan population on its soil is not good news. It has several long-term implications. It is common knowledge that China considers Dalai Lama as a secessionist, one plotting to divide their country. The latter’s claim of “all that Tibetans were asking for, was a status of genuine autonomy within the Constitution of the Peoples’ Republic of China”, had fallen into deaf ears. China also considers him as someone who plays to the Indian tune to tickle China. Therefore, at a time when China has successfully shrunk the Dalai Lama’s space internationally, India continuing to extend the usual space for him is viewed as complicity. Sharp reaction from China when he was allowed to visit Arunachal Pradesh in April 2017, is a recent example. Such being the delicate nature of India-China relations on matters and issues concerning Tibetans, India can hardly afford to ignore the division within the diaspora. Past experience of dubious elements from Tibet having succeeded in infiltrating the Central Tibetan Administration, including the security wing, should be a warning.
    It is also time India understands the reason behind Tibetans seeking Indian passports, despite an existing arrangement for issue of Identity Certificates, which is passport equivalent. Some had even successfully taken recourse to legal remedy on the issue, and left the government of India red-faced. These changing moods should not be viewed as desires by Tibetans to become Indian citizens. They are triggered by the pathetic state of affairs associated with issuing of Identity Certificates, where delays in most cases are anything between six months to one year. Early streamlining of the process will drastically reduce their desire to hold Indian passport. It will also remove the wrongly perceived notion among some educated Tibetan youth, that the cumbersome process was a ploy by India to confine them in this country. While India should not shy from requesting the Dalai Lama to use his good offices to end all differences within the community in the interest of India’s internal security, it will also be necessary to ensure that young Tibetans do not nurse a silent grudge against the very country they called their second home.

  31. Although the Dalai Lama has offered an apology, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) still expressed their disappointment over his controversial comment on Nehru, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC). Dalai Lama called Nehru self-centred.

    The Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.

    Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting controversial information to students: Arunachal Congress
    Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation: APCC
    | DAMIEN LEPCHA | ITANAGAR | August 12, 2018 9:58 pm
    disappointment over the recent statement made by Tibetan Spiritual Leader the 14th Dalai Lama in which he called Jawaharlal Nehru, the former Prime Minister of India as “self-centered” and the one responsible for parting India and Pakistan.
    “Although Dalai Lama expressed regret over his controversial comment, the APCC is extremely thwarted by it. A Tibetan spiritual leader calling names to an Indian leader who sweated most to keep him and his followers safe from Chinese aggression is simply not acceptable. Today, India is home to lakhs of Tibetan refugees who are living in 37 settlements and 70 scattered communities across different states of India,” APCC vice-president Minkir Lollen said in a statement on Sunday.
    “Dalai Lama may have forgotten that India provided a beam of light and hope to Tibetans remaining in Chinese-dominated Tibet and in the neighbouring Chinese provinces politically cut off from the Tibetan heart land. All these happened only because India has great leaders like Gandhi and Nehru who took the responsibility of social burden to shelter thousands of persecuted Tibetans then in 1959,” Lollen added.
    Minkir said Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation, hope and trust of millions on record and the same are watching his contribution towards the mankind.
    “In such circumstances, Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting partial and controversial information to the students who are the torch bearer of the nation,” the Congress said.
    Further stating that the statement of the spiritual leader could be a politically motivated one and made with an effort to approach Prime Minister Narendra Modi for survival of his continuation in the country, the Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.

Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Please enter a valid email address

Please enter your message

Show More
Show More

(Allowed file types: jpg, jpeg, gif, png, maximum file size: 10MB each)

You can now upload MP4 videos to the comments section. "Choose File" -> click "Upload" then wait while your video is processed. Then copy the link and paste it into the message box. Your video will appear after you submit your comment.
Maximum size is 64MB

Contemplate This

.…Instead of turning away people who practise Dorje Shugden, we should be kind to them. Give them logic and wisdom without fear, then in time they give up the ‘wrong’ practice. Actually Shugden practitioners are not doing anything wrong. But hypothetically, if they are, wouldn’t it be more Buddhistic to be accepting? So those who have views against Dorje Shugden should contemplate this. Those practicing Dorje Shugden should forbear with extreme patience, fortitude and keep your commitments. The time will come as predicted that Dorje Shugden’s practice and it’s terrific quick benefits will be embraced by the world and it will be a practice of many beings.

Dorje Shugden and Dalai Lama – Spreading Dharma Together | Terms of Use | Disclaimer

© 2024 | All Rights Reserved
Total views:10,630,868