So i find it all very strange that the Dalai Lama is attacking the practitioners but not the deity himself. The outcome was that, both the 5th and the current Dalai Lama has realized that Dorje Shugden is indeed enlightened, and wrote prayers for him, but why no prayers against him?
What a great point. I've never looked at it that way. Indeed, why doesn't the Dalai Lama or many, many, many of the high lamas across all traditions, just do something to "attack" the deity back? Give him a taste of his own medicine? Destroy him completely?
By not being able to destroy him, is that to say that the spirit has more power and is more invincible than all the highly attained lamas put together? That all the fire pujas and binding rituals that had previously been done by high lamas had all failed? That the high lamas and all these pujas are ineffective?
The fact that nothing is even being done says plenty about how contradictory this whole ban is. There were Hayagriva Tamdin rituals done in the late 1990s to destroy him, nothing happened. And no further efforts have been made to destroy, bind or subdue the "demon". What does that say about the people who are supporting the ban on him? That all of them, including the Dalai Lama, are incapable of taming a mere little spirit? And have given up on any further efforts? That they would be so low as to then divert their attentions to attacking the practitioners instead? tsk.
Surely, if there was a type of food out that, that you were saying is poisonous, it would be wiser to remove that brand of food off the supermarket shelves, than attacking and denouncing the people who buy it and eat it? This is the same as what is happening with the Shugden practice. The Dalai Lama banned it because of its supposedly harmful affects on practitioners. Well - then destroy the deity, not the practitioners? This is very logical.