Author Topic: Merits vs Karma  (Read 15893 times)

KhedrubGyatso

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
    • Email
Re: Merits vs Karma
« Reply #15 on: November 08, 2011, 04:02:51 AM »
( from hoperainbow ) The problem is very simple:
Who is motivated free of the 8 worldly concerns and acts in alignment with the 3 Fundamentals of the Path? Who?
 Certainly not me, and for as long as I have not achieved at least some high level of bodhicitta, my mind cannot create merit.
That sounds like bad news, uuuhhh!!!

>>I would say many practitioners. The problem is not simple. We all can have such motivation, if not how and what are we practicing ? But how pure and sincere that motivation is, determines its efficacy in bringing about results.

We  can create all kinds of merit with our mind. However, the quality of that merit depends upon one's motivation. The higher the motivation the higher the quality of the merit which will ripen as states of happiness.The lowest quality merit will ripen as temporary happiness and good fortune of this life. With middling motivation, we achieve nirvanic peace and with  the highest , bliss of buddhahood. With the mind of refuge in the 3 jewels, we can achieve happiness of the heavenly gods and humans.
Sorry, when it comes to merits there is no bad news.  Able to create merits is the most beautiful aspect of having a human mind : ))


shugdentruth

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Merits vs Karma
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2011, 06:13:58 PM »
Thank you forum friends for your kind replies. It has helped me very much to understand merit and karma.  ;D

buddhalovely

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
    • Email
Re: Merits vs Karma
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2012, 01:18:37 PM »
"Punya" or "merit" is a particular type of "karma" leading to the destruction of "karma" and the escape from "samsâra". "Karma" is conditioned action arising from a motive and seeking a result, i.e. always requiring further action. Confusion between good "karma" and merit is common. The former leads to a better rebirth (a higher one with better circumstances), whereas the intent of the latter is to cause liberation from "samsâra" by virtue of the power of the object of merit, the Three Jewels : Buddha, Dharma & Sangha. Hence, good "karma" & merit differ in terms of motivation & goal. As one of the two causes of enlightenment (the other being wisdom), it takes us beyond cyclic existence. Moreover, excellent merit is motivated by the mind of enlightenment for the sake of all sentient beings (cf. Bodhicitta).

Another form of the object of merit is the so-called "Field of Merit", the assembly of enlightened beings visualized during meditation in front of us. Ordinary (samsaric) good seeds allow us to harvest outer ordinary (samsaric) crops. But if we sow faith & the spiritual path in the Field of Merit, we harvest, besides good fortune in this and the next life, the extraordinary inner crops of Dharma realizations such as love, compassion, joy, equanimity, "Bodhicitta", physical & mental suppleness, wisdom, liberation, the irreversible escape from cyclic existence, and final enlightenment. Ordinary good "karma" can never realize this ! It does lead to the climax of the world of the gods, yet gets exhausted and so cannot take away suffering for good.

While liberation allows the Arhat to enter a personal, "lesser" type of "nirvâna", final enlightenment involves a total, complete escape from all emotional defilements and mental obscurations of "samsâra".

"Karma" or "action" is understood as a mental, verbal (energetical) or physical deed, and "vipâka" its fruit, result or reaction, accompanying every action like a shadow following its object. The seed is "karma", the fruit arising from it is "vipâka". In general, "karma" refers to actions, their effects and the potentialities left in the mind from the moment of the completion of the action to the moment they ripen and their results are experienced.

In a wider sense, every contaminated event (a phenomenon tainted by reification) is determined by "karma", the natural power of action and its consequences. Karmaless action has done away with reification. The complete network of concordant conditions giving rise to physical, psychological & social determinations is the result of past momenta. Much of what "karma" was about in the past, is today the object of science (the DNA-code as an example of "karma" ?). In a narrow sense, "karma" points to the spiritual consequences of actions and cannot be divorced from an implicit hylic pluralism, explaining how the invisible mechanisms of "karma" operates.

Any kind of physical, verbal & mental intentional action is "karma" and so generally, all good & bad actions constitute "karma". Involuntary, unintentional or unconscious actions, although deeds, do not constitute "karma", for conscious volition is absent. This differs from those non-Buddhists (like the Jains) who think unintentional actions also constitute "karma".

In the workings of "karma", mind is crucial. All physical actions, verbal & mental deeds are coloured by consciousness. Hence, when mind is guarded, bodily action is guarded and speech is also guarded.

The simple mechanism of action is given by the first two kinds of actions mentioned by the Buddha : good begets good, evil begets evil, like attracts like. A same message is heard in Ancient Egypt, in the Judeo-Christian West and in the Muslim world. This universal message is not typically Buddhist. By contrast, the notion of action destroying action points to the Truth of Cessation and the possibility of "nirvâna". This destruction cannot be complete without the end of ignorance ("avidyâ"), the fundamental root-cause of our wandering about as blind, unsatisfied, closed-up actors.