Hello Guru,
just to add some things you seem to have overlooked: one doesn't have to be against His Holiness the Dalai Lama to be worried about the glaring contradictions in the statements about Dorje Shugden, the de facto human right violations happening right now and the schism in the Sangha and sufferings of lay people they create, and the complete refusal of the Tibetan Government in Exile (from which, on a political level, HH the Dalai Lama cannot be separated) to agree to any kind of dialogue with anyone who upholds the practice of Dorje Shugden, since so many years.
Worried about what? Internally, about what will happen to the noble tradition of Je Tsongkhapa with its great contemporary saints branded as evil, monks excommunicated etc etc. Externally - and this you should consider - what will happen to the Dalai Lama's reputation once these facts (especially the human rights aspect) are 'discovered' by sensationalist tabloid journalists who will have a feast dismantling 'the myth Dalai Lama'? They will not be bothered with respect nor facts, but only big headlines. What will happen to Tibetans and Buddhists in general once the Dalai Lama's reputation is ruined? They will lose all sympathy very quickly, because he is their very image, and then what? Who will donate? Who will help? Will you tell 'us Ingis' to roll back to our native religions and leave you to settle it amongst Tibetans as well?
I don't think so, just like i don't think telling us not to cause division (?) while calling us - do you have any idea how many Tibetans are reading and writing here? - again and again 'You Ingis', foreigners, insinuating that no one except Tibetans has the genetic capacity to practice Buddhism... that same old rhyme we have heard so many times?
The people who have brought HH the Dalai Lama to the West and have made him famous are Dorje Shugden practitioners. The people who are his world-wide audience and who give 99% of the donations to help Tibetan refugees are Ingis - i would try to generate some minimal respect for them (they are also sentient beings by the way).
Eventually, inevitably, the above described scenario is going to happen. Unless... dialogue happens, religious freedom happens first. Wouldn't it be a million times easier to say, 'Let's agree to disagree', and let everyone be REALLY free to practice as they wish?
What we are doing is trying to push in this direction - open discussion with two parties discussing, not only one - by providing tons of information of which huge parts are not just opinions but verifiable facts. Either these facts are soon acknowledged openly or they are going to someday go into the channels mentioned, which none of us wishes. You cannot keep things this big under the rug when you're world famous. His Holiness has said he will win this 'battle' with the power of his reputation, yet this hasn't happened in the monasteries - not in THIRTY YEARS - and it hasn't and won't happen globally. I don't believe for a minute that the Dalai Lama has any bad intentions - in short, i think he's been just trying to make majorities happy - but it is obvious that he has bad advisers, both on the political and oracular level, and now this thing is really going ballistic.
One last thing - the Tibetan monk we saw discussing with the Dalai Lama's representative during the protests was a) very educated and b) very respectful, calling the Dalai Lama 'Gyalwa Rinpoche', as respectful Tibetans do. That's the very big, very obvious difference between practitioners of Je Tsongkhapa's tradition and fanatical Dharamsala politics followers (eastern or western) who would rather burn people's houses than read a book or think for themselves. Of course there are, meanwhile, unfortunately, many people who can't help having negative thoughts about the Dalai Lama's speech and actions. This is another very tragic consequence of Dharamasala's incomprehensible policy that degrades so many including our holiest Lamas. But if you read the actual contents of this site and think about it, i think you will see that we hope and strive for is a good outcome for everyone involved, not just those 'on the right side'. And this is something i find much more worthwhile than trying to prove i am right by slandering all others.
Far sighted is indeed what we should be.
Yours, beggar