dorjeshugden.com

About Dorje Shugden => General Discussion => Topic started by: LosangKhyentse on June 13, 2010, 10:46:19 AM

Title: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 13, 2010, 10:46:19 AM


Your Holiness The Dalai Lama,

How can anything Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche taught be wrong or any part be mistaken? That would compromise the blessings of the lineal lamas which includes Yourself.

With such a reincarnation lineage stemming back to the time of the Sage Shakyamuni Himself and being so learned, how can this master Trijang Rinpoche be wrong?

Please lift the ban. Please give people the choice to practice what they wish according to their lama's practices.

You have said countless times, your previous incarnations propititated Nechung so hence, you must continue in the tradition of your predecessors. If that is the case many Lamas have practiced Dorje Shugden in their previous incarnations, so let them have the right and freedom to continue with their predecessors like yourself.

Just like you have the freedom to bestow Nechung on your disciples, so should the many other lamas bestow Dorje Shugden on their disciples.

You are One, they are many, please in your great compassion and with folded hands I implore you to lift the ban and let everything become as it was before your great passing which I do not wish.

Whatever You have said or done, I have the deepest faith and respect for You even till now. I with tears in my eyes IMPLORE AND BEG You to lift the ban. Let me have the freedom to practice without discrimination what my saintly lamas have bestowed upon me and millions of others.

Prostrating to You,

TK


Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Zach on June 13, 2010, 03:09:49 PM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 13, 2010, 03:53:57 PM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???

Dalai Lama encourages the worship of Nechung. Always quotes what Nechung says publicly as reasons for some of his decisions.

He encourages Nechung temple, Oracle, practice to proliferate. If you go Dharamsala, many pictures of Nechung are for sale everywhere. Near the long circumambulation circuit around Dalai lama's palace in Dharamsala, a Nechung Shrine house has been erected for ppl to circumambulate around. The funny thing is Nechung is not an enlightened being. In fact an evil being that was subdued by Guru Rinpoche after a psychic war. He is still not enlightened and therefore not a proper object of refuge.

With Nechung not being enlightened, there's no Two Sides about it. Everyone knows he is not enlightened FROM DAY ONE. Full stop! But at least with Dorje Shugden, there's a large 'camp' that believe he is enlightened which he is.

So why encourage Nechung worship and practice when he is a subdued evil spirit. SO WHY BESTOW NECHUNG ON PEOPLE???

TK
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Zach on June 13, 2010, 04:13:39 PM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???

Dalai Lama encourages the worship of Nechung. Always quotes what Nechung says publicly as reasons for some of his decisions.

He encourages Nechung temple, Oracle, practice to proliferate. If you go Dharamsala, many pictures of Nechung are for sale everywhere. Near the long circumambulation circuit around Dalai lama's palace in Dharamsala, a Nechung Shrine house has been erected for ppl to circumambulate around. The funny thing is Nechung is not an enlightened being. In fact an evil being that was subdued by Guru Rinpoche after a psychic war. He is still not enlightened and therefore not a proper object of refuge.

With Nechung not being enlightened, there's no Two Sides about it. Everyone knows he is not enlightened FROM DAY ONE. Full stop! But at least with Dorje Shugden, there's a large 'camp' that believe he is enlightened which he is.

So why encourage Nechung worship and practice when he is a subdued evil spirit. SO WHY BESTOW NECHUNG ON PEOPLE???

TK


Duh this is new to me friend ! What is there some sort of empowerment for Pehar....?
Its an irony isnt it the REAL evil spirit is the one whom he has been taking advise from for a very long time Padmasambhava bound him as a protector...But i remember hearing once that one day it is prophesised that Pehar will break his oath and wreak havoc amongst the Dharma.  >:(

The Nechung temple has been around for centurys as far as i know...But i did not realize there was devotion to this spirit encouraged ? Would you be able to shed futher light on this  ?  :)
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 13, 2010, 04:17:51 PM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???

Dalai Lama encourages the worship of Nechung. Always quotes what Nechung says publicly as reasons for some of his decisions.

He encourages Nechung temple, Oracle, practice to proliferate. If you go Dharamsala, many pictures of Nechung are for sale everywhere. Near the long circumambulation circuit around Dalai lama's palace in Dharamsala, a Nechung Shrine house has been erected for ppl to circumambulate around. The funny thing is Nechung is not an enlightened being. In fact an evil being that was subdued by Guru Rinpoche after a psychic war. He is still not enlightened and therefore not a proper object of refuge.

With Nechung not being enlightened, there's no Two Sides about it. Everyone knows he is not enlightened FROM DAY ONE. Full stop! But at least with Dorje Shugden, there's a large 'camp' that believe he is enlightened which he is.

So why encourage Nechung worship and practice when he is a subdued evil spirit. SO WHY BESTOW NECHUNG ON PEOPLE???

TK


Duh this is new to me friend ! What is there some sort of empowerment for Pehar....?
Its an irony isnt it the REAL evil spirit is the one whom he has been taking advise from for a very long time Padmasambhava bound him as a protector...But i remember hearing once that one day it is prophesised that Pehar will break his oath and wreak havoc amongst the Dharma.  >:(

The Nechung temple has been around for centurys as far as i know...But i did not realize there was devotion to this spirit encouraged ? Would you be able to shed futher light on this  ?  :)


There's a Nechung Monastery in Dharamsala and Nechung Oracle. Both are advertised and highlighted by the Tibetan Govt in Exile always. The TGIE also sponsors them.

There are many videos on this website and youtube regarding Nechung and the monastery. Please do a search.

TK
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Zach on June 13, 2010, 04:42:22 PM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???

Dalai Lama encourages the worship of Nechung. Always quotes what Nechung says publicly as reasons for some of his decisions.

He encourages Nechung temple, Oracle, practice to proliferate. If you go Dharamsala, many pictures of Nechung are for sale everywhere. Near the long circumambulation circuit around Dalai lama's palace in Dharamsala, a Nechung Shrine house has been erected for ppl to circumambulate around. The funny thing is Nechung is not an enlightened being. In fact an evil being that was subdued by Guru Rinpoche after a psychic war. He is still not enlightened and therefore not a proper object of refuge.

With Nechung not being enlightened, there's no Two Sides about it. Everyone knows he is not enlightened FROM DAY ONE. Full stop! But at least with Dorje Shugden, there's a large 'camp' that believe he is enlightened which he is.

So why encourage Nechung worship and practice when he is a subdued evil spirit. SO WHY BESTOW NECHUNG ON PEOPLE???

TK


Duh this is new to me friend ! What is there some sort of empowerment for Pehar....?
Its an irony isnt it the REAL evil spirit is the one whom he has been taking advise from for a very long time Padmasambhava bound him as a protector...But i remember hearing once that one day it is prophesised that Pehar will break his oath and wreak havoc amongst the Dharma.  >:(

The Nechung temple has been around for centurys as far as i know...But i did not realize there was devotion to this spirit encouraged ? Would you be able to shed futher light on this  ?  :)


There's a Nechung Monastery in Dharamsala and Nechung Oracle. Both are advertised and highlighted by the Tibetan Govt in Exile always. The TGIE also sponsors them.

There are many videos on this website and youtube regarding Nechung and the monastery. Please do a search.

TK

Yes they are highlighted as being almost a cabinate adviser the Nechung oracle which is rather odd considering that many predictions it makes are off...Especially with regards to Tibets Freedom.  :-\
When you said Bestow Nechung i assumed you ment in the form of some sort of self-generation empowerment.
Perhapes Dear Trinley Kelsang will no some more with regards to this being.  :)
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Zhalmed Pawo on June 13, 2010, 06:47:53 PM
This nechung-thingy, or rather the need for the TGIE to drag Nechung also to this debacle, has always seem a funny one. And yet, it is totally logical. How so? Bear a little:


Whenever governments and politicians fail to deliver the glorious future they have been promising, they have two choices. Either they admit, that they have failed, or they proclaim that there exists a force preventing them from delivering. In democracies, the leaders usually get replaced, but when the government is non-democratic, the leaders simply cannot admit that mistakes have been made, that the obtacles were underestimated, and so forth. This holds true especially in all totalitarian systems; the Party cannot have made mistakes, the God-King cannot have miscalculated, the Fuhrer has not made misjudgemets. All the problems and unfulfilled promises are caused by not bad leadership, but by insidious forces within our midst!

By this token, the Soviet Union did not misfunction because the theory and leadership were bordering on idiocy, but because there were "reactionary forces, enemies of the people, saboteurs, and so forth" among the people themselves. To get to the socialist paradise, let us just get rid of these unwanted elements of our society. Then everything will be just as the Party has promised. A little purge, some spillage, and the paradise is ours!

The Third Reich had their share of "decadent elements, jews, homosexuals, whatever", which being removed, would let the Party to usher the glorious thousand year empire, promised initially to all germans.

And as the TGIE has promised the freedom of Tibet, and it yet does not arrive, is not this just a proof that there are some reactionaries and collaborators amongst the tibetans, who must be singled out and ostracised. Surely the non-freedom is not because the Leader of the TGIE has grossly miscalculated the sheer will and strength, not to mention institutional patience, of the communist party of Beijing. There cannot be mistakes made, for the Leader is after all, trapped in his own image, as a Buddha, and he simply cannot make errors. So whatever prevents the freedom of Tibet must be within "the reactionary elements of morally deviant conspiring saboteurs", yes. All within the refugee community, and their secret supporters, the foreign agents. The Beijing cannot be blamed for non-freedom, for they are the ones that TGIE has to negotiate with, so the blame must be somewhere else, amongst the tibetans themselves. But not within the TGIE, for they are not capable of making errors, miscalculations, or misjudgements. So what can we blame? Well, why not Dorje Shugden practitioners? They fit the role.

Beyond this, there is nothing deeper, or larger, or grander, thinking or scheming in existence behind the Ban.  The Ban is just that. No big picture, but just a page from the oldest book of politics.

And how does the Nechung fit in this? Well, after all, once the Leader had proclaimed, that Nechung had stated that there would be freedom in the year so-and-so, and it never manifested, there must be, by the aforementioned logic, a spiritual conspiracy, some dark force, that prevents Nechung from doing what the Leader has told, or interpreted as told, for otherwise Nechung would surely had delivered the promised freedom. And therefore it necessarily follows, that Dorje Shugden must be seen as a force opposing Nechung, just as the Dorje Shugden practitioners must be seen as an evil conspiring force; both the deity and the practitioners, preventing the Leader from delivering on his promises. For after all, the other alternative would be to admit, that the Leader just does not have a clue. But since he is "publically a buddha", he cannot be seen as an incompetent driftwood, so lo, there must be an evil ghost with his supporters, preventing the State Protector and the State Leader.

That is all, folks!

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 13, 2010, 07:10:25 PM
This nechung-thingy, or rather the need for the TGIE to drag Nechung also to this debacle, has always seem a funny one. And yet, it is totally logical. How so? Bear a little:


Whenever governments and politicians fail to deliver the glorious future they have been promising, they have two choices. Either they admit, that they have failed, or they proclaim that there exists a force preventing them from delivering. In democracies, the leaders usually get replaced, but when the government is non-democratic, the leaders simply cannot admit that mistakes have been made, that the obtacles were underestimated, and so forth. This holds true especially in all totalitarian systems; the Party cannot have made mistakes, the God-King cannot have miscalculated, the Fuhrer has not made misjudgemets. All the problems and unfulfilled promises are caused by not bad leadership, but by insidious forces within our midst!

By this token, the Soviet Union did not misfunction because the theory and leadership were bordering on idiocy, but because there were "reactionary forces, enemies of the people, saboteurs, and so forth" among the people themselves. To get to the socialist paradise, let us just get rid of these unwanted elements of our society. Then everything will be just as the Party has promised. A little purge, some spillage, and the paradise is ours!

The Third Reich had their share of "decadent elements, jews, homosexuals, whatever", which being removed, would let the Party to usher the glorious thousand year empire, promised initially to all germans.

And as the TGIE has promised the freedom of Tibet, and it yet does not arrive, is not this just a proof that there are some reactionaries and collaborators amongst the tibetans, who must be singled out and ostracised. Surely the non-freedom is not because the Leader of the TGIE has grossly miscalculated the sheer will and strength, not to mention institutional patience, of the communist party of Beijing. There cannot be mistakes made, for the Leader is after all, trapped in his own image, as a Buddha, and he simply cannot make errors. So whatever prevents the freedom of Tibet must be within "the reactionary elements of morally deviant conspiring saboteurs", yes. All within the refugee community, and their secret supporters, the foreign agents. The Beijing cannot be blamed for non-freedom, for they are the ones that TGIE has to negotiate with, so the blame must be somewhere else, amongst the tibetans themselves. But not within the TGIE, for they are not capable of making errors, miscalculations, or misjudgements. So what can we blame? Well, why not Dorje Shugden practitioners? They fit the role.

Beyond this, there is nothing deeper, or larger, or grander, thinking or scheming in existence behind the Ban.  The Ban is just that. No big picture, but just a page from the oldest book of politics.

And how does the Nechung fit in this? Well, after all, once the Leader had proclaimed, that Nechung had stated that there would be freedom in the year so-and-so, and it never manifested, there must be, by the aforementioned logic, a spiritual conspiracy, some dark force, that prevents Nechung from doing what the Leader has told, or interpreted as told, for otherwise Nechung would surely had delivered the promised freedom. And therefore it necessarily follows, that Dorje Shugden must be seen as a force opposing Nechung, just as the Dorje Shugden practitioners must be seen as an evil conspiring force; both the deity and the practitioners, preventing the Leader from delivering on his promises. For after all, the other alternative would be to admit, that the Leader just does not have a clue. But since he is "publically a buddha", he cannot be seen as an incompetent driftwood, so lo, there must be an evil ghost with his supporters, preventing the State Protector and the State Leader.

That is all, folks!



Dear Zhalmed Pawo,

1. I am amazed at your writing ability. I can never write so fluidly and so clearly. Fantastic writing. I truly wish so much you would write books, articles, whatever and always. It is so succulent to read. I enjoy it so much. After reading what you wrote, I know your thoughts and what your expressing perfectly clearly. You are gifted.

2. I don't agree with your theory, but you know what, who cares?? Your theory, and the way you express it is so clear. So fantastic!! You really earn my respect. It doesn't matter who is right, what you write is your belief, it is passionate. I FULLY RESPECT YOUR THEORY and will remember it. I will share it with others also.

3. I SINCERELY THANK YOU for your sharing. I am on your side. I will remain on your side, although we differ in our theories for the current ban...I am proud to be part of 'your' 'our' Dorje Shugden camp!! You and many others are so talented on this forum. So many talented, intelligent, devoted and passionate people on this forum. Wonderful!! Together may we overturn this ban or at least make it insignificant and ignored in the near future. May we on this forum and getting involved on this website share the truth and bring Dorje Shugden's golden era into fruition quickly!

Long Live Dorje Shugden!! Keep writing Zhalmed Pawo! Never Stop!!

TK


Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: honeydakini on June 13, 2010, 07:29:37 PM
Thank you for all the views... and *LOVING* Zhamed Palmo's entry on this post.

The other "funny" odd thing about this whole thing is that if you trace the history of Dorje Shugden, it was Nechung who encouraged Dorje Shugden to arise as a Dharma Protector many hundreds of years ago. So odd that 1) after encouraging him to arise as a protector 2) allowing thousands of practitioners to propitiate him for over 350+ years (including Dalai Lama), "Nechung" suddenly realises/ decideds that DS is an evil spirit.

He may be a subdued evil spirit. But he's not dumb. And he's subdued for a reason. If he's going to be playing tricks, surely there will be repercussions for him too. Nope, he can't be that dumb.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: WoselTenzin on June 13, 2010, 07:33:59 PM
Hi Zhalmed Pawo

Although like TK, I don’t agree with your theory, what you wrote is so funny and entertaining.  I can’t stop laughing when I read it.  You are an excellent writer with a great sense of wit and a big tinge of bitchiness.   If I didn’t know better,  I think it can make sense to me  ;D
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: a friend on June 13, 2010, 09:25:31 PM

I'm not so sure that ZP wrote with the purpose of being funny. Although he is always funny and mostly, witty. In any case he is being accurate in an almost painful way.

No doubt he is trying again to show that the theory that appears when you google this website "DS DL spreading Dharma together" is a wishfulthinking fantasy. I was going to say that this theory/fantasy is unnecessary but it IS necessary for certain people. It plays several roles that we can only guess. It has a type of reverse but similar role than the ban: the ban finds wrong where there is no wrong to hide failures or to prevent them, this theory finds good where there is no good to hide what is wrong.

Here several reasons why this theory is necessary or might be necessary:
1- It allows Tibetans that love and worship their Dalai Lama and cannot disentangle his two roles, secular and religious, to accept that what he is doing is wrong but saving him from any possible judgment by inventing a fantastic intention. Instead of attributing a normal intention, political, arising from the DL as political leader, they attribute an imaginary beneficial intention, against all the sayings of the DL. Actually they are not defending the DL. They defend "their" Dalai Lama, a complex mixture of father figure with ancient sacred king figure, with patriotic identity, a figure that nobody that is not Tibetan can properly understand. I have to say that I find it quite natural that a Tibetan adheres to this theory. If I were Tibetan I would desperatly try to find some justification, in the same way that I would've tried to find justification for any wrong action that my own father could've committed. (He didn't, my dad was a saintly man).

2- It allows Buddhists that have received teachings from the Dalai Lama, again, to be able to say that what he did is wrong, but by the trick of the imaginative theory, they might be trying not to break their vows of Guru devotion.

3- It allows Buddhists that did not receive teachings from the Dalai Lama but that have teachers who did receive them ... the same.

4- The fourth possibility is miscellanea, you can fill it in. From feel good thinking to whatever.

So this "DS DL spreading Dharma together" is a religious fantasy, but I don't see anything wrong with keeping it in my heart if I need it. One has the right to go easy with the mind, not to force the mind to bear what is unbearable.

Now, to make it public ... that is the problem.

I've given some religious reasons to maintain that to make it public is a problem.
But there are also non-religious reasons.

For the moment the image of the Dalai Lama is mostly preserved because of his international standing and because it's difficult for people to give up on such popular icon of goodness.  But any moment the world can truly realize that he has inflicted civil and social persecution on a minority. The elements are out there and the image of the puzzle can become clear all of a sudden. (Not that I wish that, on the contrary.) If that happened the world is going to turn against us, as XXI century Buddhists, for having defended a perpetrator of human rights attacks. And this is no good for the good name of Buddhadharma.

Anyway, no biggie, we already have a saviour if this were to happen: WSS. What they did is hopefully enough to prevent all Buddhists to be called "cover uppers for a dictator" or some other nicety.

Warning: Since begging others to please follow our view has been visualized as tyrannical, as similar to TGIE's actions, let's clarify matters. I beg all the members of this Forum to join me in this view (particularly in the religious part that does not reflect a personal opinion but just facts of Dharma). But of course nobody is forced to follow this view. Nobody is forced not to speak openly of theirs neither.

And yes, LIFT THE BAN.

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: icy on June 14, 2010, 02:27:50 AM
Dear DS people

Please correct me if I am wrong.  There is no bad or good in this world.  Whatever challenges DS people have now eventually there will be light. Bad situations and challenges will transform to good and beneficial situations.  What the Dalai Lama is doing is indirectly creating a lot of adverse publicity for Lord Shugden and spreading the teaching world wide; spreading like wild fire; His skillful methods with wisdom and compassion for the world, even the Chinese in China can benefit from this furor while his reputation is at stake, much to his compassionate intent.

There will be a lift to the ban eventually - Victory to Lord Shugden! :-*

icy
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: harrynephew on June 14, 2010, 02:56:09 AM
Thank you for all the views... and *LOVING* Zhamed Palmo's entry on this post.

The other "funny" odd thing about this whole thing is that if you trace the history of Dorje Shugden, it was Nechung who encouraged Dorje Shugden to arise as a Dharma Protector many hundreds of years ago. So odd that 1) after encouraging him to arise as a protector 2) allowing thousands of practitioners to propitiate him for over 350+ years (including Dalai Lama), "Nechung" suddenly realises/ decideds that DS is an evil spirit.

He may be a subdued evil spirit. But he's not dumb. And he's subdued for a reason. If he's going to be playing tricks, surely there will be repercussions for him too. Nope, he can't be that dumb.

I luuuuuuuuuuuuuuuurve ZP's posting. Though I don't completely believe in his theory but i can read the love and passion that ZP puts into the writing. It makes his writing very engaging and we need more of you!!!!

Yea, Honeydakini, all these contraversy with the TGIE and HHDL is so funny. He proliferates Nechung who is a worldly spirit in the first place which is totally discouraged and at the same time who made and encouraged the manifestation of DS. Now suddenly DS is a wrong issue.

Hello Nechung...... If u think DS is wrong now, you're a little dumb to contribute in making him a protector 350 years ago, aint ya?

But if that's not the case,
I think we're not doing enough to promote DS! That's wy HHDL is fanning up more fire in Dharamsala for us to get agitated with the new Nechung shrine and HHDL's Nechung-ism.

So guys! print more brochures, make the DS movie come out, write more books abt DS, do more DS pujas and INVITE MORE PEOPLE TO JOIN THIS FORUM!!!!!

WE NEED DS!!!

H1N1
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 14, 2010, 08:59:53 PM
Dear DS people

Please correct me if I am wrong.  There is no bad or good in this world.  Whatever challenges DS people have now eventually there will be light. Bad situations and challenges will transform to good and beneficial situations.  What the Dalai Lama is doing is indirectly creating a lot of adverse publicity for Lord Shugden and spreading the teaching world wide; spreading like wild fire; His skillful methods with wisdom and compassion for the world, even the Chinese in China can benefit from this furor while his reputation is at stake, much to his compassionate intent.

There will be a lift to the ban eventually - Victory to Lord Shugden! :-*

icy

It's safer for one's practice to see it this way.

Times have changed. Dharma has to degenerate unfortunately. Whether we like it or not, we are a part of the degeneracy. Better 'degernate' dharma than no dharma at all. Plant seeds for Maitreya is the best hope for me.

We should never give up simply because things don't go our way or ppl don't share our views. Why? You give up, you lose and you inspire no one to carry on the torch.

TK
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Big Uncle on June 15, 2010, 03:53:58 PM
This thread is interesting. Why do the Dalai Lama ban Dorje Shugden and claim him a spirit while he turns around and consult another spirit Nechung (an unenlightened spirit)? It really doesn't makes sense! I like the way he gets away with it but I do like the fact that he is making Dorje Shugden such a renown 'menace'. Intelligent people will see through his flimsy logic and get curious of this obscure Tibetan practice. Lovely way to spread this practice.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: honeydakini on June 15, 2010, 03:58:08 PM

It's safer for one's practice to see it this way.

Times have changed. Dharma has to degenerate unfortunately. Whether we like it or not, we are a part of the degeneracy. Better 'degernate' dharma than no dharma at all. Plant seeds for Maitreya is the best hope for me.

We should never give up simply because things don't go our way or ppl don't share our views. Why? You give up, you lose and you inspire no one to carry on the torch.

TK

I agree with you TK. Thanks for the perspective that "degenerate dharma is better than no dharma at all". If we are going to take a line of being so "purist" then we should be comparing ourselves to the times of Shakyamuni himself! I dare say that even the "purest" and most conventional of practitioners among us on this forum wouldn't be nearly half as proper or sincere a practitioner as those in Shakyamuni's times. Heck, the fact that many of us  are still not ordained and floating around in our material attachments is evidence enough that we are not as sincere practitioners as we could be.

So if we are like this, then imagine all the other thousands more beings that are not even remotely connected to the Dharma or any spiritual path in any way. Then, we have to approach them and connect to them by even more "degenerate", worldly or "lowly" means. It's not that it's high or low - it's a method to reach someone.

My own Lama has, for example, given me many gifts; he has sometimes even helped me financially, in my health, counselled me in my failing relationships - from what I have read of many spiritual accounts between practitioners and their Gurus, I have gathered that many of the Lamas in today's day and age help their students in many, many, many varied and unexpected ways that are not confined to the teaching throne. From a purely purist view, it is already "degenerate" that our Lamas have to do that. Why is it okay for us degenerates to receive this kind of kindness from our teacher, but not for other "more degenerate" people to receive other kinds of help, even if it seems trite / material / silly / corrupted to us .

Look at how teachers like Chogyam Trungpa "taught" his students by drinking sake with them, hanging and socialising with them like their friends. Look at Tsem Rinpoche's blog! If we want to go all the way with labelling things as "degenerate", then isn't it also "degenerate" and a use of "worldly means" that a highly incarnated lama and ordained monk has to resort to going on a laptop and blogging to reach us silly people? Yet, we are so attracted to this medium (because we are techno nerds that love being online!), it helps us, it deepens our faith in Dharma, awakens new perspectives in us. If this method works for us, consider the countless, thousands other methods that will work for countless, thousands others of us out there.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: triesa on June 16, 2010, 05:35:14 PM
Dear HoneyDakini,

I agree with every word you said. And I would love to be connected to a lama of this 21st century. I am going to check out Tsem Tulku Rinpoche. I got to read more about Tsem Rinpoche when TK posted the link to his blog on Varjayogini practice.

Tsem Tulku Rinpoche's blog is very unconventional, I like his style. There is always something new in his blog. It is not just some interlectual teachings, but I can see and feel "DHARMA IN ACTION". I like that.

For a high lama with the recognition of a "Tulku", who spends hours on the blog to reach out to the masses, he surely knows what better method should be used in this 21st century.... Cyber Space......to reach to us nerds. I pray for the long life of  His Emminence.

Triesa



Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: a friend on June 17, 2010, 05:22:35 AM
Quote
My own Lama has, for example, given me many gifts; he has sometimes even helped me financially, in my health, counselled me in my failing relationships - from what I have read of many spiritual accounts between practitioners and their Gurus, I have gathered that many of the Lamas in today's day and age help their students in many, many, many varied and unexpected ways that are not confined to the teaching throne. From a purely purist view, it is already "degenerate" that our Lamas have to do that.


Honeydakini, it's not at all "degenerate" that our holy Lamas do that. It's traditional, and it's one of the things they are supposed to do as Lamas, to be generous with the disciples to attract them and soften their minds. Of course in older times, to people who would value food as wealth, they would give part of the offerings to enjoy. Nowadays they will help with other needs of our lives.

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: DharmaDefender on June 17, 2010, 07:40:50 PM
Quote
My own Lama has, for example, given me many gifts; he has sometimes even helped me financially, in my health, counselled me in my failing relationships - from what I have read of many spiritual accounts between practitioners and their Gurus, I have gathered that many of the Lamas in today's day and age help their students in many, many, many varied and unexpected ways that are not confined to the teaching throne. From a purely purist view, it is already "degenerate" that our Lamas have to do that.


Honeydakini, it's not at all "degenerate" that our holy Lamas do that. It's traditional, and it's one of the things they are supposed to do as Lamas, to be generous with the disciples to attract them and soften their minds. Of course in older times, to people who would value food as wealth, they would give part of the offerings to enjoy. Nowadays they will help with other needs of our lives.



With respect a friend, I think honeydakini qualified her statement by saying 'purely purist view'. I took HD's words to mean that if we're really as devoted to our lamas as we say that we are, then surely help that extends beyond the teaching throne is not necessary. Therefore it is already degenerate in our own practices that our lama has to employ skilful means to teach the dharma to us. Degenerate in the sense the lamrim teachings alone should be enough, and yet through our lack of transformation we almost 'force' our lamas to consider other means aside from just teaching.

Or maybe I'm putting words in HD's mouth that weren't there!!!
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: DharmaDefender on June 17, 2010, 07:58:00 PM
This thread is interesting. Why do the Dalai Lama ban Dorje Shugden and claim him a spirit while he turns around and consult another spirit Nechung (an unenlightened spirit)? It really doesn't makes sense! I like the way he gets away with it but I do like the fact that he is making Dorje Shugden such a renown 'menace'. Intelligent people will see through his flimsy logic and get curious of this obscure Tibetan practice. Lovely way to spread this practice.


Especially since it's well-documented that Nechung was a spirit...it's not like we made it up! Then again, lots of things about this ban don't make sense (prime example on this thread! http://www.dorjeshugden.com/forum/index.php?topic=553.0). But like tk has said, it's safest for our practice to see it from icy's point of view which is:

Quote
There is no bad or good in this world.  Whatever challenges DS people have now eventually there will be light. Bad situations and challenges will transform to good and beneficial situations.  What the Dalai Lama is doing is indirectly creating a lot of adverse publicity for Lord Shugden and spreading the teaching world wide; spreading like wild fire; His skillful methods with wisdom and compassion for the world, even the Chinese in China can benefit from this furor while his reputation is at stake, much to his compassionate intent.


Thankfully for the law of impermanence, no situation is forever lasting. Karma for bad situations and challenges will end, and the ban will fade one day.

It's intelligent people that we need for this lineage to survive, not capricious practitioners whose beliefs are easily swayed by cheap talk. Intelligent people will understand a practice and, having received it, keep the commitments. Intelligent people will see the benefits of the practice and know that it is not worth giving up. And if they are REALLY intelligent, they'll know that it's smart to show gratitude for the kindness of their teacher in giving them the practice, and repay it by doing the practice well. Intelligent people is what, I believe, will take for Dorje Shugden's lineage to persevere and grow.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: a friend on June 18, 2010, 04:16:24 AM
Quote
Lovely way to spread this practice.


Lovely way to spread this practice ...
With much excuses, this is too much.

I really don't think that the people spreading this extraordinary nonsense are aware of what they are doing.
The harm, the dishonor that they are bringing to Buddhadharma.
You talk of intelligent people ... fine ... please use your power of reasoning before spreading this view.
I wish so much that the author, the originator of this website could come and accept a debate about it. But I don't imagine that he or she is not aware of the things that we have been saying since 2007 about this "DL DSh spreading Dharma together." And we never had an answer.
Look the extremes where this theory is pushing people.

So this is the theory. The Dalai Lama decided one luminous day to spread the practice of Dorje Shugden, a Dharmaprotector, in a certain way, a way that never before a Buddha of the past had used to spread the practice of any Deity, be it Dharmapala or not. Not foreseeing that he was going to request, one day, to bring back Tibet "to the fold of Mother China", he decided that whatever he did the Chinese were going to oppose, and that that was a very clever way to spread the practice of a Dharmapala that even historically, according to him, he had abhorred. So to obtain this aim, utterly bizarre, he decided the following:

*To ban the Deity that he wanted to promote.

* To break samaya with his Guru, proclaiming to the world that his Guru, and all the Gurus of his Guru, in a lineage going back three hundred years, was wrong, were wrong.

* To go against everything he had been saying to the world, about compassion, about tolerance, about democracy, about the happy possibility for all religions to live together.

* To start a full fledge persecution of the practitioners of a religious practice, reducing them to a pariah status.

* To push Tibetans and other Buddhist practitioners to commit all sorts of sins through repeated exhortations.

* To congratulate those who actually committed the bad deeds that he had promoted.

* To force a schism in the Sangha, one of the five deeds ...

A lovely way, indeed, to show compassion and wisdom.
A lovely way, indeed, to teach the people of this Jambudvipa, by his example, what people should adopt as behavior and what they should abandon.

A lovely way. A way never before staged by any Buddha. As Je Pabongkapa would say: this is going to take them to a place where never a Buddha went before.

Lovely indeed.

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: DSFriend on June 18, 2010, 04:47:44 AM
Wait what Tk Bestow Nechung ?  ???

Dalai Lama encourages the worship of Nechung. Always quotes what Nechung says publicly as reasons for some of his decisions.

He encourages Nechung temple, Oracle, practice to proliferate. If you go Dharamsala, many pictures of Nechung are for sale everywhere. Near the long circumambulation circuit around Dalai lama's palace in Dharamsala, a Nechung Shrine house has been erected for ppl to circumambulate around. The funny thing is Nechung is not an enlightened being. In fact an evil being that was subdued by Guru Rinpoche after a psychic war. He is still not enlightened and therefore not a proper object of refuge.

With Nechung not being enlightened, there's no Two Sides about it. Everyone knows he is not enlightened FROM DAY ONE. Full stop! But at least with Dorje Shugden, there's a large 'camp' that believe he is enlightened which he is.

So why encourage Nechung worship and practice when he is a subdued evil spirit. SO WHY BESTOW NECHUNG ON PEOPLE???

TK


It goes to show how people have faith and believe in Lamas in this case Dalai Lama, instead of deities. I suppose it shouldn't surprise us that if people can believe in a subdued evil spirit like Nechung because Dalai Lama says so, then following the same "illogical logic", people will believe Dalai Lama if he says NOT to rely on an enlightened being like Dorje Shugden.

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: a friend on June 18, 2010, 05:17:23 AM
Quote
It goes to show how people have faith and believe in Lamas in this case Dalai Lama, instead of deities. I suppose it shouldn't surprise us that if people can believe in a subdued evil spirit like Nechung because Dalai Lama says so, then following the same "illogical logic", people will believe Dalai Lama if he says NOT to rely on an enlightened being like Dorje Shugden.


Dear DSFriend,

I don't think that the "faith" that Tibetan people put in the Dalai Lama can always be compared to the faith that they have for their Lamas.
The Dalai Lama, more than a Lama, represents an extremely archaic figure in the history of mankind, much much older than the blessed century when our Lord Buddha walked this Earth. He is the God-King, a figure comparable to that of Faraoh or other ancient monarchs. The strength and sacredness of this figure is litterally immeasurable, because it comes from an old collective unconcious pool of knowledge. Add to this that there has been a conscious intent to assimilate the figure of DL to the old kings of Tibet ... then you are ready for a kind of relationship between leader and people that disfigures the relationship between Lama/disciple. The first one is a relationship for this world, for wars, for conquest, for glory, for the preservation of a nation. The second one is a relationship aimed at liberation and enlightenment, two objectives divorced from the world.
We had here a passing Tibetan that said that for him the Dalai Lama was more important than Dharma, and that he chose the Dalai Lama over Dharma. He was describing in a few words the behavior of the Tibetan people. Many acted against the practitioners of Dorje Shugden because they feared the power of the Dalai Lama and his wrath. But many acted against the practitioners because they chose the Dalai Lama over Dharma.
This is very understandable, because at a time when they are losing their country to another power, another culture, their only strength, they feel, comes from that ancient figure of father, god, king, the one who has become for them the face of their own identity as Tibetans. Of course they are going to chose him over Dharma. Their behavior is very logical in psychological terms.

(Problem is, part of their pride as a nation is to have been a repository of Dharma. This is another explanation of the strange theory that makes the title of this website. They have to give a mantle of Dharma even to non-Dharmic actions, if they are committed by their leader.)


 
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: LosangKhyentse on June 18, 2010, 10:49:09 AM
Quote
It goes to show how people have faith and believe in Lamas in this case Dalai Lama, instead of deities. I suppose it shouldn't surprise us that if people can believe in a subdued evil spirit like Nechung because Dalai Lama says so, then following the same "illogical logic", people will believe Dalai Lama if he says NOT to rely on an enlightened being like Dorje Shugden.


Dear DSFriend,

I don't think that the "faith" that Tibetan people put in the Dalai Lama can always be compared to the faith that they have for their Lamas.
The Dalai Lama, more than a Lama, represents an extremely archaic figure in the history of mankind, much much older than the blessed century when our Lord Buddha walked this Earth. He is the God-King, a figure comparable to that of Faraoh or other ancient monarchs. The strength and sacredness of this figure is litterally immeasurable, because it comes from an old collective unconcious pool of knowledge. Add to this that there has been a conscious intent to assimilate the figure of DL to the old kings of Tibet ... then you are ready for a kind of relationship between leader and people that disfigures the relationship between Lama/disciple. The first one is a relationship for this world, for wars, for conquest, for glory, for the preservation of a nation. The second one is a relationship aimed at liberation and enlightenment, two objectives divorced from the world.
We had here a passing Tibetan that said that for him the Dalai Lama was more important than Dharma, and that he chose the Dalai Lama over Dharma. He was describing in a few words the behavior of the Tibetan people. Many acted against the practitioners of Dorje Shugden because they feared the power of the Dalai Lama and his wrath. But many acted against the practitioners because they chose the Dalai Lama over Dharma.
This is very understandable, because at a time when they are losing their country to another power, another culture, their only strength, they feel, comes from that ancient figure of father, god, king, the one who has become for them the face of their own identity as Tibetans. Of course they are going to chose him over Dharma. Their behavior is very logical in psychological terms.

(Problem is, part of their pride as a nation is to have been a repository of Dharma. This is another explanation of the strange theory that makes the title of this website. They have to give a mantle of Dharma even to non-Dharmic actions, if they are committed by their leader.)


 



I agree very much with 'a friend' and would like to also add, that the younger Tibetans may not see Dalai lama as the god king and full agree with his policies, but it is politically very dangerous to go against him.

You have tremendous faith in him or not, you like him or not, and if you agree with him fully or not, doesn't matter. You have to feign great agreement and devotion to the Dalai Lama. If you don't your livelihood, family, safety WILL BE IN COMPLETE DANGER  anywhere in the Tibetan settlements of India. You are somewhat safe if your a Tibetan not in agreemant with Dalai Lama if your in Nepal or Bhutan though.

When interviewing school kids in USA and asking them what they want to be when they grow up, some reply to be the President. Everyone thinks how smart, ambitious and what a cute kid. If you ask that of a Tibetan Kid in India or Tibet and he says the next leader of Tibet it would be big trouble & sacrilegious. Cannot ever say things of that nature in 'democratic' Dharamsala, it is unheard of and would be considered anti-Dalai Lama rhetoric. Perhaps your working for the Chinese would be the suspicion for that kid's family. Hence when Dalai Lama passes (sorry), no one can replace him because no one is allowed to be groomed for that. Yes, this system may have worked in the past, but certainly not for the future. I am just waiting for Dharamsala govt 'ministers, royalties, power brokers' to scatter into the ten directions very soon. I am sorry to say things like that, but I mean that TGIE's hold is limited and short term. Shugden will prevail.


TK

Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: WisdomBeing on June 18, 2010, 06:46:04 PM
11th Panchen Lama gives sermons in Tibet
June 17, 2010 
The 11th Panchen Lama, Bainqen Erdini Qoigyijabu, had given sermons to Tibetan monks and Buddhist followers over the past two days in Tibet, winning the appreciation of an audience of about 1,400.

It was the first time the 20-year-old Panchen Lama, one of the two most senior living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism, has preached sermons since he was enthroned as a Tibetan Buddhist leader in 1995.

About 800 monks dressed in crimson and mustard cassocks while 600 believers wore traditional Tibetan robes as they attended the sermon given on Monday morning and Tuesday morning at the Zhaxi Lhunbo Lamasery in Xigaze in southern Tibet.

The 11th Panchen Lama, who is also vice president of the Buddhist Association of China, spent more than four hours outlining his understanding of The Three Principle Paths, a Buddhist classic written by Tsongkhapa, founder of the Gelug sect of Tibetan Buddhism.


Thank you for the news... I'm glad to hear that monks and laypeople in Tibet can attend Dharma teachings. May the Panchen Lama live long and come to his own soon...
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: DharmaDefender on June 18, 2010, 10:03:15 PM
No Charge For Buddha's Teachings In Tibet!



11th Panchen Lama gives sermons in Tibet
June 17, 2010 
The 11th Panchen Lama, Bainqen Erdini Qoigyijabu, had given sermons to Tibetan monks and Buddhist followers over the past two days in Tibet, winning the appreciation of an audience of about 1,400.

It was the first time the 20-year-old Panchen Lama, one of the two most senior living Buddhas in Tibetan Buddhism, has preached sermons since he was enthroned as a Tibetan Buddhist leader in 1995.

About 800 monks dressed in crimson and mustard cassocks while 600 believers wore traditional Tibetan robes as they attended the sermon given on Monday morning and Tuesday morning at the Zhaxi Lhunbo Lamasery in Xigaze in southern Tibet.

The 11th Panchen Lama, who is also vice president of the Buddhist Association of China, spent more than four hours outlining his understanding of The Three Principle Paths, a Buddhist classic written by Tsongkhapa, founder of the Gelug sect of Tibetan Buddhism.

It is a blessing to me that I can hear the teachings of the Panchen Lama in my lifetime, 67-year-old Yangla said.

I benefit a lot from the sermons of the living Buddha, she said.

The Zhaxi Lhunbo Lamasery was built in 1447 and was the traditional residence of Panchen Lamas.

The 11th Panchen Lama was born in February 1990 in Lhari County, in northern Tibet's Nagqu Prefecture, with the secular name Gyaincain Norbu.

He was approved by the central government as the reincarnation of the 10th Panchen Lama in November 1995 after a lot-drawing ceremony among three candidates in the Jokhang Temple in Lhasa.

Since then, he has offered head-touching blessings to hundreds of thousands of believers and enthusiastically participated in activities for the public good

Seems like he's continuing the work of his previous incarnation, which was very much linked to China.

In fact, if you want to look at it this way, perhaps he was indirectly paving the way for practices like Dorje Shugden to grow in China.

As his 10th incarnation, he worked with the Chinese government which is something many people disagreed with. However, in doing so, he would've planted the seeds of Vajrayana practice in some of the Chinese people's minds - they would be more willing to listen to the teachings of a lama who appears to be friendly with them, than the teachings of a lama who appears to be against (e.g. His Holiness the Dalai Lama). It helps the Chinese then to accept his reincarnation as valid, and therefore be receptive to receiving teachings from his 11th incarnation...and when practices like Dorje Shugden go to China, it will have fewer problems finding practitioners because the people there already have the basic practices and grounding that the Panchen Lama worked to establish.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Helena on June 26, 2010, 05:06:56 AM
Whether the BAN is in effect or not, did it stop the practice of DS? We all know the answer to that. All things, no matter how bad it looks on the outside, if they are done with a higher motivation for a higher purpose, then it is beyond reproach. As we are not Enlightened as yet, we may not see that far or go back that far to piece every single info and construct a sound, accurate reasoning. All I know is this - without HH DL creating the BAN, DS would not have been catapulted into such a HUGE issue that demands worldwide attention now. And the DS practice still goes on, every one of us will still find a way to continue even with much modification, innovation and creative ways of masking that we do not practise. Nothing changes, but seemingly something IMPORTANT is changing though.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Mohani on June 26, 2010, 07:32:15 AM
Hi Samayatree,
Welcome to the forum.  ;)
Just wanted to say he did not stop the practice but if the Dalai Lama had not created this schism there would be many more practitioner of Gyalchen Dorje Shugden, and probably more harmony in the Sangha and tibetan community.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Helena on June 27, 2010, 05:45:52 AM
Hi Mohani, thanks for the welcome. You are the first to welcome me, actually. Personally, I tend to think that it is precisely because HH DL banned it that it has caused so much publicity about DS. I am one of those who caught on because of all the Big-ness of this issue and got very curious. Otherwise, I would not have known about it. In terms of attracting new people to DS, I guess, it worked its magic. In terms of discouraging or deterring people from practising DS, I don't think it can or ever will. I believe people who are firm in their faith in DS will never give it up, though they may have to find their own way of practising it and yet remaining neutral on the outside. Those who can give up their DS practice easily, then there is nothing more to say. If at all, I'd say this whole BAN will seive through the fake from the real deals. Those who give up now, will give up eventually, ban or no ban. Causes only confirm who or what we are/do. They do not make or break us. This is why even after Tibet is invaded, Buddhism can become bigger and has spread wider. The Masters did not stop then, they will not stop now. I think we should look at that, and contemplate seriously and perhaps, learn from them. It's certainly much better than wasting our time getting caught up in other people's BS. You have great knowledge, Mohani. I can sense that from reading all the things you post. So, please do share more and enrich all of us. we all could use more enrichment and not just bashing others. So, we can create the causes for the return of the KING, and be shining examples of the KING's men and women. Thank you so kindly. 
Hi Samayatree,
Welcome to the forum.  ;)
Just wanted to say he did not stop the practice but if the Dalai Lama had not created this schism there would be many more practitioner of Gyalchen Dorje Shugden, and probably more harmony in the Sangha and tibetan community.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: harrynephew on June 27, 2010, 09:24:01 AM
This thread makes people think in deeper into the subject of the matter. There are many points which we can put into consideration which the above posts have already done so. In many instances, HHDL is constantly contradicting himself but in doing so HHDL is bringing this subject up to the world. I remember in one of HHDL's talks about compassion in Budddhism, HHDL mentioned that the very fact there are many wars and human harm today as compared to the days of the past is all accredited to the media.

HHDL is both a political and spiritual figure who is constantly in the eyes of the media, with HHDL's every word and order, it makes it 'easier' for HHDL to present this protector to the general public. In doing so, HHDL puts himself down in a rather degrading manner. It takes time and patience and also much study to understand what is actually happening within the Tibetan community. An enlightened being such as HHDL whom many claim to be a manifestation of Lokeshwara can only do things to benefit people in the long run.

I have heard many high Lamas putting themselves onto the firing line in order to help people achieve a certain kind of realization on the long run. Even if it means to put their own reputation at risk. This is indeed done out of great compassion.

If we do look into the subject deeper, it seems that there is more to just one deity and one Lama to the subject. It is actually for the benefit of those whom even think or hear about Dorje Shugden that'll benefit. I'm sure many people have actually come onto this website due to this upheaval to understand more and gain better insight.

H1N1
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Helena on July 01, 2010, 04:33:11 PM
Yes, I truly appreciate threads, posts and comments that help me think deeper and see new things. I love enrichment and value that. So, do you think that HH DL and DS have been working together since the time of the Fifth Dalai Lama to sow the seeds for certain things to sprout at this time because it is time for DS to take over from Nechung? I have read something similar, just briefly though but I cannot remember the book's name and can't find it now. Something that sounds like changing of guards or guardians, an some sounthern gate or something. If anyone knows anything about this, please share more. I feel like I am on brink of reaching a new deeper understanding of it. I really would be so grateful. THANK YOU.
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: honeydakini on July 02, 2010, 08:23:12 AM
Yes, I truly appreciate threads, posts and comments that help me think deeper and see new things. I love enrichment and value that. So, do you think that HH DL and DS have been working together since the time of the Fifth Dalai Lama to sow the seeds for certain things to sprout at this time because it is time for DS to take over from Nechung? I have read something similar, just briefly though but I cannot remember the book's name and can't find it now. Something that sounds like changing of guards or guardians, an some sounthern gate or something. If anyone knows anything about this, please share more. I feel like I am on brink of reaching a new deeper understanding of it. I really would be so grateful. THANK YOU.

Funny you should mention that as I had just re-visited that very book over the last weekend to catch up on some old reading. The book is "Oracles & Demons" by Rene De Nebesky-Wojkowitz.

I've gone back to the book to dig up what I read about the changing of Dharma Protectors. Here's what it says about the Nechung Gompa in Tibet:

"The Southern Gate is held closed in accordance with an old tradition that the chokyong Dorje Shugden is waiting at this entrance for the day to come on which he will be allowed to enter the monastery, to succeed pehar as the Chief dharmapala of Tibet..."

It is also accompanied by an image of the layout of this gompa, which depicts a door towards the south of the chapel; and two doors at the east and west. It is known that people will officially use the east and west doors only, and that the southern door remains symbolically closed.

I hope this helps!
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Gabby Potter on April 20, 2015, 03:42:00 PM
Families and friends have been separated and ostracised from their society because they practise Dorje Shugden. How is worshiping ( sorry for lack of a better word ) Dorje Shugden is not allowed why worshiping Nechung is? Everyone knows Nechung is a spirit, how is the worship of spirit is allowed while doing Dorje Shugden's practise is not allowed? There are evidence to prove that Dorje Shugden is an enlightened Buddha. Your Holiness, please lift the ban for the benefit of millions people around the world, please allow all of us to live together peacefully and without having to worry being discriminated. Please lift the ban against Dorje Shudgen practise. _/\_
Title: Re: Lift the ban
Post by: Matibhadra on April 20, 2015, 05:16:30 PM
Quote
Your Holiness, please lift the ban

Since according to you the ban is the act of great mahasiddha, why now do you ask the evil dalie lift it? You obviously suffer from the splitting of mind functions popularly known as schizophrenia.