dorjeshugden.com

About Dorje Shugden => General Discussion => Topic started by: LosangKhyentse on February 15, 2010, 04:05:52 PM

Title: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: LosangKhyentse on February 15, 2010, 04:05:52 PM


Excuse my ignorance on WSS but can someone answer my questions 1 and 2 please? Thank you ahead of time.

1.   Why did the WSS protests stop? Or did they?

2.   Will they start up again? ( Protests was helpful)

3.   The protests did have effects. It made the Tibetan Govt in Exile more careful, wary, swallow some past statements, and lie further to cover.  In fact Samdhong Rinpoche had to say that the forced stick votes in the Monasteries and the forced swearing of abandoning Shugden was enforced by the respective abbots of each monastery which in fact is not the truth. It was the Dalai lama and TGIE who forced the abbots to conduct such offensive acts OR THE ABBOTS WOULD BE FORCED TO RESIGN AS IT HAPPENED TO THE ABBOTS OF GADEN SHARTSE AND GADEN JANGTSE MONASTERIES.  They also had to change their words to say there is no ban but it is JUST advice. That was strange because if you don’t follow their advice, you are not allowed to participate in any mainstream activities with other Tibetans. You are on your own. That is not advice, but a all out ban or religious persecution.

4.   I wished the placards and chanting at the WSS protests didn’t say: “Dalai lama, Stop Lying!” I wished it had said, “Dalai Lama lift the ban, give religious Freedom.” In this day and age, it would not be prudent for any religious leader to have any bans. Bans are very negative sounding and make them look very narrow or fundamentalist. Bans would have caused more curiosity for ppl to ask more. The Dalai lama lying sounds too far-fetched to most ppl in their projections. But the word ban would raise suspicions perhaps. I am not criticizing the protests. They were clean, organized, sincere, effective to a point, expressed another view, gave voice to the many oppressed, and orderly. The fact that these protests could happen is amazing. Just my thinking.

5.   Geshe Kelsang Rinpoche, the illustrious master, can influence thousands and inspire hundreds of centers/chapters around the world. Similarly, the monks in Serpom Monastery and Shar Gaden Monastery have many qualified teachers who if given a chance can do quite a lot in the future. If one person like Geshe Kelsang Rinpoche can do so much because he is devoted, focused and true to his lineage, many more Geshe Kelsang Rinpoches are present and will be forthcoming from these monasteries. The Mayflower with two other ships sailed from England to the uncharted North America due to religious persecution in England to seek a place where they can practice their beliefs in peace. No one cared about them or thought they would even survive. Now look what has happened….USA is built on freedom of religion, etc and influenced many other nations to do so. It has its good and bad, but the good is more. So Serpom and Shar Gaden has that type of potential. No matter how inconsequential they may look to the TGIE now. We must support these monasteries. We must advertise/make known by any methods who they are and what they are doing. It is very important for the future for all of us to do so along with whatever we are doing now. Serpom and Shar Gaden Monastery will survive past the Dalai lama and TGIE (sorry). It is important for us to visit these monasteries, make documentaries, invite the teachers to come and teach in various countries and start up centres related to these two monasteries. They have the potential to spread this holy lineage to thousands of non-Tibetans around the world. It will be the non-Tibetans who preserve this precious lineage eventually is my guess.

6.   After the Dalai Lama passes away (sorry to say this also), TGIE will disintegrate. The Tibetan ministers/ppl with money will buy their way to other countries and not remain in India. Most Tibetans are dying to leave. And if they live in another democratic country, their rantings and ravings on the evils of Dorje Shugden will be mostly ignored, so the ban will fade in one way in that manner.

In Delhi today, it is a massive black market business. Buying visas to the USA is between Indian rupees 700,000-1,200,000 depending on your connections. Once you get your visa, you enter USA, and claim asylum and wait for your green card. MANY MANY MANY TIBETANS ARE DOING THIS and have gone. They finds sponsors to help them. The Tibetans will disband and scatter further all over the earth like ants after the Dalai lama. No other religious leader or leader can fill the role of Dalai lama as there’s no history of it, with the only one coming close was the previous Panchen Rinpoche (truly a strong, remarkable, powerful being). The Indian govt will not take Tibetan exiles politics, hunger strikes, free Tibet protests, land agreements in the 23 settlements, nor their religious bans. They will be sucked into the Indian mainstream without much political voice anymore. They will slowly ‘disappear’ into just survival. Most of the Tibetans living in exile have very little knowledge, understanding and exposure to anything beyond their own limited realities due to very poor education for the last 50 years in exile. Sad to say.

India will rather make friends with China. India’s leadership will change and go past the Dalai lama in exile era in the future. 1.2 billion Chinese are much more important than 150,000 Tibetans in exile. That is logic. India does not support any type of Tibetan Independence and this is while the Dalai lama is alive. Imagine in the future when he is not (sorry). Tibetans, their politics, their cry for freedom will fade as ppl need to get on with just surviving. Dorje Shugden’s name is huge now in the world. His name is larger than if his own ppl wanted to make it. When the ban starts to fade or Dalai lama has passed later, slowly (not very slowly though), ppl will ask about Shugden. Then all the young Shugden lamas, Serpom/Shar Gaden ppl, and we will explain, talk, initiate, gather friends, supporters, and make Dorje Shugden grow more but positively. The name Shugden now is negative. BUT THERE IS A NAME. The negative can be changed to the positive. The name is important. Negative and positive is dependent on circumstances.  What we need is the name AND IT IS OUT THERE-thanks to the Dalai Lama. One strong Dagom Rinpoche, Geshe Tendar, Domo Geshe Rinpoche, Trijang Rinpoche or etc in the future can bring thousands of ppl in the fold. Imagine if they all go out full force. I am not waiting for them to do something. I am doing something. I don’t believe in waiting. We cannot expect the lamas to promote, or advertise Dorje Shugden or themselves all by themselves. WE HAVE TO ADVERTIES DORJE SHUGDEN AND THE LAMAS for them.. WE HAVE TO MAKE THEM WELL KNOWN BY VARIOUS MEAN. WE HAVE TO MAKE THEM POPULAR. WE MUST WORK ON THIS GOAL CONTINUOUSLY. I am doing so and will never stop.  My resources and energy are dedicated to Shugden.. I don’t want to sound too covert or so hardworking, but I mean it.  I have dedicated my life to Gyelchen Dorje Shugden, the King of Protectors.

I do not just post on this forum. I have other plans of which some have been done, some are in planning stages and some will fruition later.I am not the only one, as there are many around the world doing the same. I don’t care much what the Tibetan Govt says or Dalai Lama’s ban and I’m not afraid of it. It is a temporary 'setback.' They will fade. They are impermanent.

But Dorje Shugden’s name is the most popular in the world of Tibetan Buddhism around the world after Shakyamuni. I hope I didn’t brag too much re my work and plans, my apologies. Bottom line is I am, have been and will go all the way to make Shugden known and accepted. I do it peacefully, without offending, without breaking laws, gently but steadily.

The bans on Shugden by DL and TGIE will not hold water after they are gone. Dorje Shugden is immortal, they are not. Their plans to even wipe away even the memory of Shugden for the future will not be successful, because Shugden is fully enlightened and his existence/ability to help DOES NOT DEPEND ON Dalai Lama OR TGIE.  Dorje Shugden can emanate in thousands, millions, billions of other forms to protect, teach, help in the three realms and ten directions way out of the reach of the TIBETAN GOVT IN EXILE. Beyond anyone's imagination. Anyway we cannot be so small to think that there's only earth and one dimension. Samsara is not just earth as you all know. There are countless existences beyond our scope of mind that sentient beings exist and enlightened beings manifest differently everywhere. Tibetan Govt is tiny compared to this spectrum. But back to planet earth, TGIE will fade in time not too far in the distance. Samdhong's name and TGIE will be forgotten. Dorje Shugen will not be forgotten and continue to re-manifest according to karma, time, circumstances and need.

DL is in fact helping Dorje Shugden become larger of course some ppl think he is doing it unknowingly and some believe on purpose…that does not matter. The point is that DORJE SHUGDEN IS BIG AND GOING TO BE MORE POPULAR. The TGIE should just keep quiet about Dorje Shugden, but instead they are making him bigger. They are quite illogical and primitive. Their most important agenda is to get 'freedom' for tibet or at least autonomy and they have failed in that miserably. Why did the Tibetan Govt in Exile lose their country in the first place?? Now the only claim to fame for them is THEY ARE TRYING TO DESTROY A SPIRIT NAMED SHUGDEN and saved the world. Imagine if Obama's claim to fame is he is trying to wipe out Satan from the US???!! That is how ridiculous it sounds. Have pity for the TGIE. I do.

In this post I have mentioned re the death of Dalai Lama a few times, I do not mean in any way I wish him to die. I do not wish harm on anyone.  I am just talking re the inevitable future. So please excuse me.

TK





Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: a friend on February 15, 2010, 05:59:54 PM


TK, I'm nobody to answer your questions about WSS, but they have been answered I think in their website, and also here. If the Dalai Lama wants to strike again, then demonstrations will start again, that´s what I gather.
I liked very much your cosmic immense view of the actions of our Buddhas.
But back to our Earth, I´m not so sure of the dissolution of things after DL passes. I have the feeling that a lot of politics will reappear under other pretexts. I foresee that Tibetans, including the new monasteries, will want to go back to the fold, back to restoring some unity. That could be another nightmare, with double Trulkus for several Lamas, and even there might be fighting over the matter we are talking about here: Who was more faithful to the Protector, the silent ones or the WSS etc etc.
I would like a formula for taking the opportunity right now, for disentangling Buddhism from politics. How do we do this, TK? Because judging for the color of this website right now, a lot of undercurrents might clash once the Tibetan leader is gone. And then what?

Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: honeydakini on February 15, 2010, 09:00:12 PM
I think, as with the passing or removal of any great leader, a nation/group etc will either sink and fall flat on its face, or like medusa hair, a few other great leaders will arise from that.

I hadn't thought thoroughly about the point that sadly, even more politics may arise within the monasteries and Tibetan communities themselves. I think that for non-tibetans it will be difficult to really quell it or play any major role within that (who are we for them to listen to us, etc) except to perhaps make it known through sharing of knowledge and encouraging open discussion on a more global platform.

I am more inclined to believe that it will be other totally new groups - such as Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, or centres under great "independent" Lamas such as Gangchen Rinpoche who will arise and take the foreground and thus make the practices more widespread and well known. While i respect very much the monasteries and the hundreds of years of education and esteemed lamas there, the scenes on "the outside" is very vastly different and it will probably take "spin offs" from these great monasteries: perhaps revolutionary (haha) new monasteries such as serpom and shar gaden, or lamas from these monasteries who "break away" that will start up a whole new movement that makes DS totally arise, and which will be free of the old Tibet and the (by-then) stale Tibetan politics.

It's nice to take hope in this (a new year wish under a victory banner, perhaps?)  ;D and i suppose to some extent we can already see this happening. There are many great Lamas who are NOT focusing on the politics of an old Tibet but reaching out to a whole new population of new generation Dharma practitioners, to share the teachings and especially Dorje Shugden's lineage with. And these people (like many of us on the forum, I believe) just WANT TO PRACTISE. This is the new generation of practitioners that will really uphold and preserve the practices i believe because they are coming in with the motivation of practice and not from an antiquated system of politics.

the future's bright, the future's red? I'd like to think so :)
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: emptymountains on February 15, 2010, 10:16:20 PM
Quote
I wished the placards and chanting at the WSS protests didn’t say: “Dalai lama, Stop Lying!” I wished it had said, “Dalai Lama lift the ban, give religious Freedom.”

It's not true--there is no ban.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: DharmaDefender on February 16, 2010, 04:08:29 AM

I´m not so sure of the dissolution of things after DL passes. I have the feeling that a lot of politics will reappear under other pretexts. I foresee that Tibetans, including the new monasteries, will want to go back to the fold, back to restoring some unity. That could be another nightmare, with double Trulkus for several Lamas


My understanding is that as a Tulku and therefore one who is in control of their rebirths, lamas can emanate as more than one being?

Isn't the falling apart of the system in that way, with in-fighting and confusion, also the gradual dissolution of things?

I do believe the TGIE will fall apart because:

(1) there is no tradition of grooming leaders for succession
(2) the TGIE is built on the Tibetan independence movement as a fundraiser. This in turn is built on the Dalai Lama's image. Once he is gone, who is there to hold it together? The TGIE doesn't act independently enough to give it any credibility.

As tk has pointed out, Tibetans are still poorly educated, and many basic living needs are still hard to come by despite so many years of living in exile. Despite this, they devote part of their meagre resources to suppressing Dorje Shugden which isn't exactly the kind of pleasant stuff that donors want to sponsor and support once the Dalai Lama is gone.

As it is, the TGIE's rantings and ravings about Dorje Shugden are being ignored by everyone, except for when the Dalai Lama himself speaks about the ban and the protests make it into the media. Once the Dalai Lama has passed away, either the TGIE will leave, or hunger for power will take over and they'll be too preoccupied trying to fill the power vacuum to remember to implement a ban.

, and even there might be fighting over the matter we are talking about here: Who was more faithful to the Protector, the silent ones or the WSS etc etc.

Who cares?? :) faith is faith - I believe once you have it, you can't be even MORE faithful, like a cup that's already full.

I think, as with the passing or removal of any great leader, a nation/group etc will either sink and fall flat on its face, or like medusa hair, a few other great leaders will arise from that.

I hadn't thought thoroughly about the point that sadly, even more politics may arise within the monasteries and Tibetan communities themselves. I think that for non-tibetans it will be difficult to really quell it or play any major role within that (who are we for them to listen to us, etc) except to perhaps make it known through sharing of knowledge and encouraging open discussion on a more global platform.

Hahaha try it and you might face accusations of being a Communist spy stepping in to muddy the already-confusing waters of Tibetan politics :)

I am more inclined to believe that it will be other totally new groups - such as Geshe Kelsang Gyatso, or centres under great "independent" Lamas such as Gangchen Rinpoche who will arise and take the foreground and thus make the practices more widespread and well known. While i respect very much the monasteries and the hundreds of years of education and esteemed lamas there, the scenes on "the outside" is very vastly different and it will probably take "spin offs" from these great monasteries: perhaps revolutionary (haha) new monasteries such as serpom and shar gaden, or lamas from these monasteries who "break away" that will start up a whole new movement that makes DS totally arise, and which will be free of the old Tibet and the (by-then) stale Tibetan politics.


I agree with you - although the monasteries currently in existence are very holy and great, the new ones will be free from the cumbersome aspects of Tibetan politics.

Perhaps I am not wording this correctly, but the new monasteries and new generation of lamas have more exposure and a better understanding of how the world today works. Geshe Kelsang Gyatso and Gangchen Rinpoche, for example, have a better understanding of how to appeal to practitioners and non-practitioners around the world. I'm not saying they are better than lamas who are in the current monasteries, but because they aren't bound by the conventions of Tibetan tradition (as opposed to Buddhist practices, which they follow strictly), they have better chances of reaching out and cementing Dharma practice in many people.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Lineageholder on February 16, 2010, 11:24:05 AM
It's not true--there is no ban.

Ha ha ha!  So funny!  ;D  Doesn't this just prove that the Dalai Lama IS a liar?

We were right to call him that.  Someone who does not tell the truth is a liar.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: emptymountains on February 16, 2010, 12:31:09 PM
Quote
I wished the placards and chanting at the WSS protests didn’t say: “Dalai lama, Stop Lying!” I wished it had said, “Dalai Lama lift the ban, give religious Freedom.”

Yes, my point was that in order for the Dalai Lama to "lift the ban," first he must "stop lying" about whether there even is a ban.

(Of course, that isn't the only lie.)
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: thor on February 16, 2010, 04:16:45 PM

But back to our Earth, I´m not so sure of the dissolution of things after DL passes. I have the feeling that a lot of politics will reappear under other pretexts. I foresee that Tibetans, including the new monasteries, will want to go back to the fold, back to restoring some unity. That could be another nightmare, with double Trulkus for several Lamas, and even there might be fighting over the matter we are talking about here: Who was more faithful to the Protector, the silent ones or the WSS etc etc.
I would like a formula for taking the opportunity right now, for disentangling Buddhism from politics. How do we do this, TK? Because judging for the color of this website right now, a lot of undercurrents might clash once the Tibetan leader is gone. And then what?


The new monasteries support the Sangha whose sole wish was to continue their practise of Dorje Shugden. They did not split due to power or political issues. When the Shugden issue disappears eventually over time, there is no longer any reason for these two monasteries to exist independently and I too foresee the monasteries returning back to the fold.

But I don't think there needs to be any debate over who was more faithful, etc. If our motivation is the same but methods differ, then there is no need for argument once the issue has blown over unless its our egos and our need to be right getting in the way. With the ban (or the non-ban) really out of the way, what is there to debate about?
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: iloveds on February 17, 2010, 05:56:41 PM
For a recap. definitely the tgie is going to dissolve there is not enough time, cohesion, motivation and effort for them to start to even stand on their own 2feet to do anything for the people. SO when there is no HHDL then its natural for the ban to disappear, for the monasteries to reunite, because in the end its all about MOTIVATION / PRACTICE.

Unless of course there is someone with the biggest ego of them all who will keep alive the "divide".

Next GEN Lamas, Dharma-6.0.2.1, sounds like a very modern approach to spirituality. Come on will we be having these same debates 10years from now, 20 years from now will you still be preaching the rights and wrongs of HHDL to anyone that will listen.

With so much time spent filling your head with these facts and figures, points of views how much time have you been practicing buddhism? I hope i will still be around for the day there is no enforcer, oppressor and no oppressed.

future does look bright indeed.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: DharmaDefender on February 17, 2010, 06:23:54 PM
For a recap. definitely the tgie is going to dissolve there is not enough time, cohesion, motivation and effort for them to start to even stand on their own 2feet to do anything for the people. SO when there is no HHDL then its natural for the ban to disappear, for the monasteries to reunite, because in the end its all about MOTIVATION / PRACTICE.

It actually falls in line with what the WSS are saying, which is that the Dalai Lama has been trying to weaken the Tibetan government by creating a constitution that does not truly support a democratic system. By increasing their dependence on him, and not giving members of the TGIE a real chance to lead, he's setting the Tibetans up to fail when he's gone. Do you think this situation could be used as yet more evidence the Dalai Lama is setting the scene for Dorje Shugden to rise?

Regarding the monasteries reconciling, do you think we create the causes for the monasteries to NOT reconcile? Judging from the abuse both sides continue to hurl at one another, perhaps reconciliation is gradually becoming more distant. If it is about ego, many find it difficult to put aside...if it were that easy to put aside, we would be enlightened by now.

Quote
Unless of course there is someone with the biggest ego of them all who will keep alive the "divide".

Not someone, but maybe quite a few. Just because someone is a member of the sangha does not necessarily mean their ego has been extinguished. They may be many steps closer than us to destroying their ego but for some troublemakers, they are willing to act in favour of protecting it.

Quote
I hope i will still be around for the day there is no enforcer, oppressor and no oppressed.

I like that!
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Big Uncle on February 17, 2010, 07:07:15 PM
I love such discussion because it allows us to look beyond the injustice and the consequences/opportunities that would arise from this whole mess instead of the smaller nitty-gritty details like the Dalai Lama lying about the ban etc.

Reality in my eyes is that the TGIE is functioning totally on the basis of the Dalai Lama. Once he is gone, the whole TGIE will collapse because we can see no future leader being groomed and there is a small chance that a few smaller leaders would appear either amongst the religious circle or even amongst the TGIE itself but their clout would be considerably smaller than what the Dalai Lama wields.

To me, Dorje Shugden will survive and become much bigger than it is right now just like what Tk said. Just look at this forum. I think everyone practices Dorje Shugden and do you think we will stop once the Dalai Lama is not around anymore? I am very sure that the Dalai Lama would not be capable of wiping out the practice because he is only leader of TGIE and not the world. What he says can't touch anyone within this forum (whom I assume are non-Tibetans) but what he says constantly propels his name into stratospheric heights that none of us here is capable of doing in our lifetime. There you go. Dorje Shugden would be huge and most of you guys will see it in your lifetime! My 5 cents worth...
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: vajralight on February 17, 2010, 07:13:38 PM
The ban will probably not dissappear since the DL has asked the Lamas to continue to eradicate Dorje Shugden practice even after his death. When the Karmapa will take over as the "spiritual leader" of the Tibetans, we will see. I do hope that he will not continue the persecution but he seems awfully tight with the Dl, so who knows.

The DL told Karmapa and Zong tulku to take over after his death (in "the unwinking gaze" documentary) and since the Karmapa is the most charismatic one I feel that he will definitely come out as the Tibetan spiritual leader and take over the role of the Dalai Lama.

Just my thoughts,

vajra
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: DharmaDefender on February 18, 2010, 02:16:33 AM
I love such discussion because it allows us to look beyond the injustice and the consequences/opportunities that would arise from this whole mess instead of the smaller nitty-gritty details like the Dalai Lama lying about the ban etc.

Reality in my eyes is that the TGIE is functioning totally on the basis of the Dalai Lama. Once he is gone, the whole TGIE will collapse because we can see no future leader being groomed and there is a small chance that a few smaller leaders would appear either amongst the religious circle or even amongst the TGIE itself but their clout would be considerably smaller than what the Dalai Lama wields.

Of course their clout is considerably smaller, because they haven't accomplished much! Results speak volumes; success shuts people up. Criticisms of the TGIE continue because they have neither results, nor success, therefore their talk continues to be ineffectual. The Dalai Lama has much bigger clout because he has success in spreading the dharma and bringing some end to people's suffering, however temporal (although many people here, I think, would debate the degree to which he is successful in this regard).

Quote
To me, Dorje Shugden will survive and become much bigger than it is right now just like what Tk said. Just look at this forum. I think everyone practices Dorje Shugden and do you think we will stop once the Dalai Lama is not around anymore? I am very sure that the Dalai Lama would not be capable of wiping out the practice because he is only leader of TGIE and not the world. What he says can't touch anyone within this forum (whom I assume are non-Tibetans) but what he says constantly propels his name into stratospheric heights that none of us here is capable of doing in our lifetime. There you go. Dorje Shugden would be huge and most of you guys will see it in your lifetime! My 5 cents worth...

I think it goes back to tk's post about how DS is formless and therefore not bound by samsaric conventions of the media, etc.

The thing is, we've been fortunate enough to have a practice that is not dependent on what the Dalai Lama does or says. For many people though, they practise in defiance of the ban which isn't a bad thing...at least they're practising! However, I'd really like to see more practitioners who are practising independently of the ban.

It's like how any 'good' lama will be, trying to cut your dependency on him/her from the moment you take refuge. If they were trying to increase your dependency on them, then it's about their ego and accumulating followers. In that case, why are you taking refuge with them? When your practice becomes independent, fueled only by your motivation to bring an end to suffering for all sentient beings, that's when the lama has accomplished a large part of their job.

A good example actually, is the TGIE, functioning totally on the basis of the Dalai Lama, as Big Uncle puts it. Their lack of independence from him is going to be the cause of their downfall when he's gone. That kind of downfall can be repeated in our practice should we choose to make it entirely dependent on our lamas.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: honeydakini on February 18, 2010, 09:02:14 PM
Come on will we be having these same debates 10years from now, 20 years from now will you still be preaching the rights and wrongs of HHDL to anyone that will listen.

With so much time spent filling your head with these facts and figures, points of views how much time have you been practicing buddhism? I hope i will still be around for the day there is no enforcer, oppressor and no oppressed.

future does look bright indeed.


hah! Good point. It would be sad indeed if we were all still on this forum 10 years later still debating the same points about the rights and wrongs of DL. It would be so beyond that by then and it would be awful if we looked back and realised that all we'd done is "fill our heads with facts, figures and points of views". I guess we gotta ask ourselves what the real result is of us being here on this forum (I am not being deliberately belligerent here as this is a questions I also need to ask myself!) - what will we achieve? Does it cement our own faith in DS stronger so that our own practice soars? Does it help us gain a better understanding so we can work effectively to share this sacred practice and lineage with others so they can receive the same incredible benefits in their lives and practice?

Thanks for making us think. I certainly wouldn't want to be here 10 years from now still "preaching rights and wrongs!"
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: DharmaDefender on February 19, 2010, 08:55:13 PM
Come on will we be having these same debates 10years from now, 20 years from now will you still be preaching the rights and wrongs of HHDL to anyone that will listen.

With so much time spent filling your head with these facts and figures, points of views how much time have you been practicing buddhism? I hope i will still be around for the day there is no enforcer, oppressor and no oppressed.

future does look bright indeed.


hah! Good point. It would be sad indeed if we were all still on this forum 10 years later still debating the same points about the rights and wrongs of DL. It would be so beyond that by then and it would be awful if we looked back and realised that all we'd done is "fill our heads with facts, figures and points of views". I guess we gotta ask ourselves what the real result is of us being here on this forum (I am not being deliberately belligerent here as this is a questions I also need to ask myself!) - what will we achieve? Does it cement our own faith in DS stronger so that our own practice soars? Does it help us gain a better understanding so we can work effectively to share this sacred practice and lineage with others so they can receive the same incredible benefits in their lives and practice?

Thanks for making us think. I certainly wouldn't want to be here 10 years from now still "preaching rights and wrongs!"

Honeydakini, your response led me to return to iloveds's post, in particular "how much time have you been practicing buddhism?" It prompted my thinking - we can be in Dharma, but is Dharma in us?

Take E-Sangha as an example. I used to observe their activities and although they came across as the authority on Buddhism, the moderators there promoted one view only, theirs (so I do appreciate that this forum is far more open). The forum basically degenerated into a massive wall of hate, supposedly as a reflection of Buddhism. Hence although E-Sangha moderators appeared to be in Dharma and promoting Buddhism, Dharma wasn't really in them.

In relation to facts and figures, E-Sangha also showed me that although many people have a deep intellectual grasp of Buddhism, their practice isn't so strong...which ties in to something that was said on this forum about the differences between Buddhism and Dharma. You might know the ins and outs of karma, but if you don't practise it like you know it, what's the point?

Facts and figures are great in that they provide the logic that keeps many people interested in the Dharma, as it is a departure from people's usual reliance on blind faith. Facts and figures are also necessary because they help to clear up wrong view.

However, for the rest of us less intellectual beings, personal experience keeps us interested. And for the rest of us, unless facts and figures are disseminated in clear, laymen's terms, what's the point if we don't understand them? The wrong view will still exist. To me, jargon is an ego thing; it's a way of saying "I know more than you and I'm going to show it to you." Where is the compassion in that?

Let me just validate that - when I was part of an audience with him before he passed away, HH Dagom Rinpoche touched on how clear speech is compassionate. He said what we know about Dharma is but a tiny speck in the great pantheon of teachings and "if our lama were to explain Dharma's true essence to us, it would blow our minds" (his words, not mine). Hence in their compassion, our lamas explain only a little, and they explain it to clarify issues for us, not to confuse us further.

I'd like to add one more thing - I think forums reflect the monastic traditions very nicely. First, there's the aspect of debate. Second, there's the situation whereby everyone has different strengths. Some monks are excellent debaters, others show their devotion physically. It doesn't mean the less skilled debaters are any less holy, less attained, have any less of a chance at enlightenment, or have any less right to learn and practise (Cudapanthaka who gained enlightenment just by sweeping is an example of this). On a forum, like in a monastery, everyone has a different function. Some are here to learn, some are here to teach, some are here to observe. Because the learners and teachers are on different levels, does not make anyone's opinion any less valid.

And one final comment - if in 10 years we don't want to talk about the rights and wrongs about the Dalai Lama, why don't we create the causes now? Law of karma, cause resembles effect, effect resembles cause, right? If we keep focusing on the Dalai Lama's good and bad points forever, we're setting ourselves up to never break away from that.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Ensapa on August 01, 2012, 06:01:39 PM
Yet another informative old topic that is worthy to be resurrected, so that more can learn from. There are just so many posts in this forum that we all can learn so much from, either about Dorje Shugden, his history, high lamas, CTA, current happenings for the Tibetans and most importantly, Dharma discussions that make us think deeper and learn. This is one of the posts that make us think deeper.


Honeydakini, your response led me to return to iloveds's post, in particular "how much time have you been practicing buddhism?" It prompted my thinking - we can be in Dharma, but is Dharma in us?

Take E-Sangha as an example. I used to observe their activities and although they came across as the authority on Buddhism, the moderators there promoted one view only, theirs (so I do appreciate that this forum is far more open). The forum basically degenerated into a massive wall of hate, supposedly as a reflection of Buddhism. Hence although E-Sangha moderators appeared to be in Dharma and promoting Buddhism, Dharma wasn't really in them.
Esangha was nothing but a platform for the moderators to push their views and make sure that everyone in the forum only follow their view. Their main purpose was to discuss Buddhism, but one of the more knowledgable mods decide to ban the forum from talking about Dorje Shugden because the Dalai Lama said so. Seeing how the entire forum complied, the moderator decide to take the bar further: by banning and talking badly about lamas that did not comply to his view. He started browbeating other moderators into submission too. Finally, he started banning other traditions from the forums, and promoted only his view and much hatred around. By now, the forum had become that moderators forum, and not long after that, the servers crashed, and they were never resurrected or heard of ever again. A fitting end for such a damaging place.

In relation to facts and figures, E-Sangha also showed me that although many people have a deep intellectual grasp of Buddhism, their practice isn't so strong...which ties in to something that was said on this forum about the differences between Buddhism and Dharma. You might know the ins and outs of karma, but if you don't practise it like you know it, what's the point?
People who can talk about Dharma in very technical and dry terms, especially when they sound like they are on a pedestal tend to contradict themselves as well when it comes to actions. Whats the use of talking about tolerance when you cannot even tolerate someone who challenges your view? That contradiction is very prominent in that forum.

Facts and figures are great in that they provide the logic that keeps many people interested in the Dharma, as it is a departure from people's usual reliance on blind faith. Facts and figures are also necessary because they help to clear up wrong view.
Facts, figures and experiential advice are important as they give a solid foundation to our Dharma practice. If we rely on the dry facts alone and our advice cannot be retrofitted to the situation and to the person's mindset, they are as good as the ink on the paper that they were printed on.

However, for the rest of us less intellectual beings, personal experience keeps us interested. And for the rest of us, unless facts and figures are disseminated in clear, laymen's terms, what's the point if we don't understand them? The wrong view will still exist. To me, jargon is an ego thing; it's a way of saying "I know more than you and I'm going to show it to you." Where is the compassion in that?
Personal experience and faith can help carry less intellectual people far. Technical information is always fun to read on and understand, especially the wisdom teachings as they sound so wonderful, but who would be able to apply them at times of need? laypeople often discuss about wisdom teachings and marvel at them, but the minute they hear about a valid Buddhist teaching that debases all of what they know about Buddhism, they instantly fall apart.

Let me just validate that - when I was part of an audience with him before he passed away, HH Dagom Rinpoche touched on how clear speech is compassionate. He said what we know about Dharma is but a tiny speck in the great pantheon of teachings and "if our lama were to explain Dharma's true essence to us, it would blow our minds" (his words, not mine). Hence in their compassion, our lamas explain only a little, and they explain it to clarify issues for us, not to confuse us further.
We are but babies compared to our lamas, who compassionately guide us to their level from ours. It is because of this that we should never criticize them.

I'd like to add one more thing - I think forums reflect the monastic traditions very nicely. First, there's the aspect of debate. Second, there's the situation whereby everyone has different strengths. Some monks are excellent debaters, others show their devotion physically. It doesn't mean the less skilled debaters are any less holy, less attained, have any less of a chance at enlightenment, or have any less right to learn and practise (Cudapanthaka who gained enlightenment just by sweeping is an example of this). On a forum, like in a monastery, everyone has a different function. Some are here to learn, some are here to teach, some are here to observe. Because the learners and teachers are on different levels, does not make anyone's opinion any less valid.
A forum like this is important to provide support and information to those who need it. Every member has a role and every reader has a role, too. The forum's open spirit helps make things interesting and it does match the open spirit that is much talked about in Buddhism.

And one final comment - if in 10 years we don't want to talk about the rights and wrongs about the Dalai Lama, why don't we create the causes now? Law of karma, cause resembles effect, effect resembles cause, right? If we keep focusing on the Dalai Lama's good and bad points forever, we're setting ourselves up to never break away from that.
I dont understand why people just dont want to practice but want to be part of the Dalai Lama side because it is bigger and more valid.

Esangha's ending was caused by their negative karma of spreading hatred and misleading people and it all started with their decision to ban Dorje Shugden from being discussed in the forums. Dharmawheel is following their steps quickly. Lets hope they dont end up like esangha and realize the error of their ways.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: yontenjamyang on September 21, 2012, 09:04:02 AM
I would like to thank the Administrator for re highlighting this thread. I have not read this thread.

What TK wrote is very comprehensive and logical. I certainly agree that the WSS protest was done very well and organized and I wish that it continues. I also agree that that there is a BAN and hence it should be emphasize as "Lift the Ban".

I will not answer point by point what is written as the article has no flaws and is very logical. The CTA does not have a effective succession plan and we do not see any leaders except perhaps the Karmapa taking some role on behalf of Tibetans after the passing of the present Dalai Lama (sorry). However, the Karmapa has his own problems as well and certainly is not in the league of the Dalai Lama. I doubt that there will be any new incarnation of the Dalai Lama (as hinted by the Dalai Lama himself) and even if there is, it will take time for the new Dalai Lama to mature. perhaps, 20 to 30 years. Also, there is a huge possibility of China recognizing another Dalai Lama. All in all, this means after the present Dalai Lama, Tibetans will have not effective leader(s) to depend on.

So logically, CTA will be rendered ineffective and perhaps finally disintegrate. So what is left? I say Shugden Lamas. Hence, Dorje Shugden will be the future.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Ensapa on September 23, 2012, 04:20:55 AM
I would like to thank the Administrator for re highlighting this thread. I have not read this thread.

What TK wrote is very comprehensive and logical. I certainly agree that the WSS protest was done very well and organized and I wish that it continues. I also agree that that there is a BAN and hence it should be emphasize as "Lift the Ban".
The WSS protests does have an effect and I do agree with TK that it has caused the CTA to think twice about what they are doing and what they are saying to people. The resultant effects are also very obvious as we can see HHDL and CTA changing their stance on the practice when talking to international media...but whats sad is that they are still quite hardline with their own Tibetans.

I will not answer point by point what is written as the article has no flaws and is very logical. The CTA does not have a effective succession plan and we do not see any leaders except perhaps the Karmapa taking some role on behalf of Tibetans after the passing of the present Dalai Lama (sorry). However, the Karmapa has his own problems as well and certainly is not in the league of the Dalai Lama. I doubt that there will be any new incarnation of the Dalai Lama (as hinted by the Dalai Lama himself) and even if there is, it will take time for the new Dalai Lama to mature. perhaps, 20 to 30 years. Also, there is a huge possibility of China recognizing another Dalai Lama. All in all, this means after the present Dalai Lama, Tibetans will have not effective leader(s) to depend on.
HHDL IS  grooming the Karmapa to take the role. It is pretty clear that the actions that contradict Buddhism and the broken samaya that the CTA have been doing over the centuries have culminated in a way that it pushes the Dalai Lama away from them, further and further. HHDL will not return anymore until they get things right. For the Gelugs, this means that they are no longer the dominant tradition in Tibet/CTA and what is left is, really nothing but the DS lamas whose practice are sound and stable.

So logically, CTA will be rendered ineffective and perhaps finally disintegrate. So what is left? I say Shugden Lamas. Hence, Dorje Shugden will be the future.
CTA will not survive with or without the Dalai Lama. Their time is up. Their time to change and adapt to the current times is up and they did not do so. Therefore their time is up.

No matter how one wants to see it, it is pretty clear that the CTA is done for in a few years' time, whether or not the Dalai Lama remains as their ripening of their negative karma is fast approaching. HHDL can always be around, but he will not lead the CTA again.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: DharmaSpace on September 23, 2012, 07:40:57 PM
The dorje shugden practitioners are under a lot of stress, ridicule and pressure  and all of them will remain much stronger in the future once the Dalai Lama does fade from this world. As TK put so well Dorje Shudgen is immortal where as the rest of us will decay when the time comes.

I will go with the immortals at any time. I also believe with the setting up of new religious institutions like Serpom and Shar Gaden goes a long way in making a very resilient group of  Gelugpa practitioners. Everything is impermanent the ban will lift.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Amitabha on September 24, 2012, 12:31:05 AM
Esangha has a lot of great amazing collection and insightful experiences for many people to enjoy and exchange. An unfortunate episode for it to be rounded up with crashing. Doubtful that it was because of DS, most often than not it may be the enormous influence of buddha dharma that caused unnecessary worry. In fact, there is no buddha disciples cause harm to anyone due to the basic fact of karmic cause and effect. Everyone was exercising love and care in varying degrees but the influence of dharma may be reckoned as over challenging to the survival towards other walks of life.  ;D
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: vajrastorm on September 28, 2012, 06:13:28 AM
CTA, like all other human organizations and institutions, is impermanent. When the Dalai Lama is no more and the causes and conditions for them to dissolve arise, they will fall apart. There is NO COUNTRY for them to govern and administer! They are guests in a foreign country.

But the King Protector is a Buddha, who will endure and His time is NOW to benefit the people of this degenerate age who need him. He's the one who has sworn to protect Je Tsongkapa's teachings, especially his propounding of Nargajuna's Middle View on Emptiness. We need to create the causes for the ban to be lifted soonest, so that He can come into his own and protect and help great Masters of Je Tsongkapa's teachings to spread the teachings.

Shugden Monasteries, like Shar Gaden Monastery and Serpom Monastery are crucibles for the nurturing of these great Masters. These monasteries must be widely publicized and promoted. There are currently young emanations of previously great Masters as well as many Geshes and Lamas, who are being trained and nurtured in these Monasteries.

Already, there are highly attained Lamas, emanations of previous great Shugden Masters, such as Kyabje Choktrul Rinpoche and Kyabje Choktrul Zong Rinpoche, who have come of age and are ready at any time to come on to the scene and spread the Dharma worldwide. Furthermore, compassionate highly attained Masters, who were devoted Shugden practitioners, have emanated as Tulkus to carry on their work of spreading the Dharma. These emanations are being recognized all the time.

Together, when the time comes(when the ban is lifted and when HH the Dalai Lama passes on) they will work together to usher in the dawn of a new great Renaissance of Buddhism, with Je Tsongkapa's teachings and the practice of Dorje Shugden as the hallmarks of this Renaissance.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: Ensapa on April 04, 2013, 04:43:08 AM
CTA, like all other human organizations and institutions, is impermanent. When the Dalai Lama is no more and the causes and conditions for them to dissolve arise, they will fall apart. There is NO COUNTRY for them to govern and administer! They are guests in a foreign country.

But the King Protector is a Buddha, who will endure and His time is NOW to benefit the people of this degenerate age who need him. He's the one who has sworn to protect Je Tsongkapa's teachings, especially his propounding of Nargajuna's Middle View on Emptiness. We need to create the causes for the ban to be lifted soonest, so that He can come into his own and protect and help great Masters of Je Tsongkapa's teachings to spread the teachings.

Shugden Monasteries, like Shar Gaden Monastery and Serpom Monastery are crucibles for the nurturing of these great Masters. These monasteries must be widely publicized and promoted. There are currently young emanations of previously great Masters as well as many Geshes and Lamas, who are being trained and nurtured in these Monasteries.

Already, there are highly attained Lamas, emanations of previous great Shugden Masters, such as Kyabje Choktrul Rinpoche and Kyabje Choktrul Zong Rinpoche, who have come of age and are ready at any time to come on to the scene and spread the Dharma worldwide. Furthermore, compassionate highly attained Masters, who were devoted Shugden practitioners, have emanated as Tulkus to carry on their work of spreading the Dharma. These emanations are being recognized all the time.

Together, when the time comes(when the ban is lifted and when HH the Dalai Lama passes on) they will work together to usher in the dawn of a new great Renaissance of Buddhism, with Je Tsongkapa's teachings and the practice of Dorje Shugden as the hallmarks of this Renaissance.

In the latest revelation, it is revealed that 200 years ago, the 14th Dalai Lama has been predicted to live up to a ripe old age of 113 but the ban itself is being slowly dissolved with the Dalai Lama's relaxing of the ban, where he will no longer condemn Dorje Shugden as he has declared earlier to a small group of disciples. But Dorje Shugden's time is now and that can only mean that the Dalai Lama will lift the ban within these few years. During then, CTA will be quite lost and scattered because they would have realized that having blind faith is the biggest mistake that they have ever made.
Title: Re: CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY FIRST TWO QUESTIONS PLEASE? Thank you.
Post by: prodorjeshugden on February 05, 2017, 02:08:09 PM
Indeed the protest have effect. The CTA has tried to suck back some things that they said long ago. This shows that the protest do have a effect on the anti shugden people.
Now the ban is starting to weaken and more attention has been pushed towards Dorje Shugden, the ban and the cruelty behind the ban. Soon enough the CTA and the Dalai Lama will be pressured into lifting the ban. But the ban did have one good outcome and that outcome is that Dorje Shugden is now more famous due to various people who spread news about the ban and the underlying reasons for the ban.

I really hope that the ban can be lifted smoothly without any hiccups or violence.