New article alert on DS.com! Just so you lot have some context...British Prime Minister David Cameron recently barred two of his ministers from meeting with His Holiness the Dalai Lama, just one month after his own meeting with Tibet's spiritual leader. There have been allegations that good ol' Dave doesnt want to tick off the Chinese who are supposed to be giving £27bil to the IMF to help them bail out our economies...
From http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/so-what-if-britain-didnt-want-to-meet-the-dalai-lama/ (http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/so-what-if-britain-didnt-want-to-meet-the-dalai-lama/)
So what if Britain didn’t want to meet the Dalai Lama?
(http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/TibetUK1.jpg)
While the fight for Tibet’s freedom continues to burn passionately throughout Tibetan communities across the world, it is becoming more and more evident that their actions and words may be doing more damage than good for themselves.
Recently, there has been much attention given to the revelation that the British Prime Minister had banned his ministers from meeting the Dalai Lama during his visit to Britain in June. This article was highlighted on a Tibetan news website, Phayul.com, which can be read here.
After the initial fuss dies down though, a series of questions come to mind: If British ministers met with the Dalai Lama, what real benefit does Britain get in return? What benefit do the Tibetans get? How does meeting the Dalai Lama help the British economy? How does it help the millions of unemployed people around the country who are trying to make ends meet and feed their families? How does it sustain, in any way, Britain’s current flailing financial crisis?
The hard truth of the matter is that there is no benefit – for either the British or the Tibetans.
(http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/ChinaUK1.jpg)
Putting aside the warm fuzzy feelings of meeting the Dalai Lama, the British are contending with very real problems for their population of almost 63 million today. Unemployment rates in the UK are at its highest since 1995, standing at 8.4% of the population. A stagnant economy is having dire knock-on effects on employment throughout the nation.
However, there’s a glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel: China. This financial giant were in talks to offer £27 billion to a fund which would be used by the International Monetary Fund to bail out failing Eurozone economies. It is certainly compassionate and generous of China to help poorer economies like that of the British and many countries across the Euro-zone. China has no obligation to do this.
So it wouldn’t seem unreasonable that the British might be reluctant to do anything that might upset China – like meet the Dalai Lama, a figure the Chinese have not liked for decades. Whatever their reasons for disliking him and whether the reasons are valid or not is besides the point. China is throwing a lifeline to a desperately ailing economy and it just wouldn’t be wise, would it, to antagonize a giant? There’s a bigger picture for the British and Europeans to be concerned about – the economy, the welfare of their people, their global standing. Not meeting the Dalai Lama – no matter how peace-loving and wonderful he is – is a small trade-off for what could potentially save a disastrous situation for their entire nation.
It seems that the Tibetans however, have a bone to pick. They aren’t happy about the British not meeting the Dalai Lama. It’s up on their website for the world to see – look how bad the British are for not accommodating our spiritual leader. Look how they pander to the Chinese.
(http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/DalaiLamaCameronClegg.jpg)
HH the Dalai Lama with the British Prime Minister David Cameron (center) and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg (right) at St. Paul’s Cathedral in London, UK, on May 14, 2012.
Again, we ask: If British ministers met with the Dalai Lama, what real benefit does Britain get in return from the Tibetan people? But consider – if the British kept up good relations with China, what great financial and political benefit could they receive? It is clear who the British would rather maintain a friendship with.
Actually, as things stand, the British have already been extremely kind to the Tibetans. For over 50 years, since the Tibetans first fled their country, countries like the United Kingdom have:
- allowed Tibetan refugees into their country and provided them aid.
- allowed visits by Tibetan Lamas into their country, to raise sponsorship to be sent back to their monasteries and people in India and Tibet.
- allowed the Tibetan flag to be flown in their country, Tibetan culture and religion to be shared and promoted among their people.
- allowed democratic ‘Free Tibet’ protests on their own British land against China’s ruling of Tibet.
Rather than protest against their refusal to meet with the Dalai Lama, the Tibetans should learn gratitude for what they have already received, in abundance, from these countries. Not look for the first opportunity to play a victim of international relations with China. Publishing articles like this on their websites only appears ungrateful and petulant.
The United Kingdom and many other democratic countries of the West have done much to help the global Tibetan communities. But with the rising economic and political might of China, one must understand that they each have to balance a tightrope with the Chinese. This is not something bad, but something necessary – if only for the pure survival of their own people and nation.
Yes, the world feels sadness for the Tibetan situation and great empathy for their wish to return to their homeland. But the world also needs to look after their own people. For all they are fighting for their own freedom, it is time the Tibetans understand the need for other governments to take care of their own people too and fulfill their most basic needs. For example, 24,000 people died from the cold of winter in 2011 – 2012 in England and Wales simply because they were too poor to pay for heating. Wouldn’t the British government need to find solutions to these most fundamental issues? This is much more important than the mere pomp and circumstance of a meeting with the Dalai Lama. The Tibetans are quick to decry their lack of freedom and support. But they fail to understand that every other country in the world wants the same things that they do and offer little empathy or support for anyone else. Seldom do they think beyond their own small ‘Free Tibet’ battle.
(http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Kundeling.jpg)
His Eminence Kundeling Rinpoche, who sued the Dalai Lama for religious freedoms
This minuteness of the Tibetans’ way of thinking is precisely what has held them back from getting back their own country. Why would China or the world take the Tibetans seriously when they nitpick on such small issues? This narrow thinking is also what has led them to repress their own people. The ban on the Buddhist Deity Dorje Shugden – and the ensuing discrimination, ostracism and attacks on people who chose to continue the practice – is a perfect example of how the Tibetan authorities focus so much of their time, energy and resources on such small, insignificant things.
The Dorje Shugden issue became so prevalent among Tibetan exiled communities that it eventually even escalated to a scale that disturbed their host country, India. For example, the Dalai Lama was taken to court within India for restricting religious freedom. Also, physical attacks against Dorje Shugden devotees risked creating instability and grave unrest across the Tibetan settlements in India.
Eventually, why would anyone take the Tibetans seriously when it is evident they cannot even look after themselves or their own people? When it is clear they have such little empathy, support or understanding for the welfare of other nations, such as the current financial crisis being faced by the British? Their recent disgruntlement about the British ministers not being allowed to meet the Dalai Lama is yet another example of a narrow fixation to achieve freedom for Tibet, only in the way they want it.
So as the Tibetans get in a flap about the British meeting or not meeting the Dalai Lama, they need to step back for a moment and think: what good really comes out of meeting the Dalai Lama? Either for the British or for the Tibetans? They wish for the British show of solidarity for their cause of freedom, but show little understanding back to the very people they’re trying to canvas for support. Try a little empathy, dear Tibetans, or even gratitude for what the world has already done to support you so far. That’s more likely to put you back on the map of discussion.