<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Point 11: The Shugden Affair: Origins of a Controversy (Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/point-11-the-shugden-affair-origins-of-a-controversy-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/point-11-the-shugden-affair-origins-of-a-controversy-part-ii/</link>
	<description>The Protector whose time has come</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sulmaya</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/point-11-the-shugden-affair-origins-of-a-controversy-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19581</link>
		<dc:creator>Sulmaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorjeshugden.com/wp/?p=9062#comment-19581</guid>
		<description>Dear author,

Thank you for this post. I would advise that your comments, true though many of them are, are written with less &quot;??!!!??&quot; and less derogatory language; your answers to Dreyfuss are valid, so there is no need to try to put him down in your answers; such a reactionary style of writing in fact devalues your own discussion points.
Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear author,</p>
<p>Thank you for this post. I would advise that your comments, true though many of them are, are written with less &#8220;??!!!??&#8221; and less derogatory language; your answers to Dreyfuss are valid, so there is no need to try to put him down in your answers; such a reactionary style of writing in fact devalues your own discussion points.<br />
Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
