Comments on: How Official China Media Portrays Dalai Lama and Dorje Shugden

By: evilshudenchinesedog

evilshudenchinesedog — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:36:25 +0000

1st of all…..Shukden is a shadow without a figure. there is no such bukkshit diety elsewhere. So just relax and take long nd deep breath.

Secondly, Shukden party as a whole is a runing dog of communist China, so everything you have mentioned here are absolutely baseless.

So just don’t try to pack your shite by an another shite.

By: Diamond Girl

Diamond Girl — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 10:43:33 +0000

Many democratic societies frown upon the mix of secular and religious leadership. This would be the foundation of such articles as put up above. However, I see the hypocrisy in the Chinese media writing like this. Have the Chinese not been guilty of oppression and political assassination? I will not even dwell on this fact as it would only be too painful to recall certain history of China where many were killed. However, I guess the Dalai Lama is an open target since he has no doubt mixed secular/political and religious leadership in his role.

I admire Dalai Lama’s tenacity of peace and compassion in his efforts for the Tibet cause. However, his actions towards Dorje Shugden practitioners always leaves a negative imprint in my mind. Yes no doubt the Dalai Clique may have operated to extreme taking the ban to a level of inhumanity. However, as influential as he is, could the Dalai Lama not stopped the violence?

I have read here for the first time that the monks in the TGIE can vote twice. It is no wonder there is no democracy and fairness. This may also explain how the CTA can continue to act without remorse towards the practitioners of Dorje Shugden. However, I have learnt that CTA is now gradually reforming, please read the forum post

http://www.dorjeshugden.com/forum/index.php?topic=1739.0

By: Jarred Dan

Jarred Dan — Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:35:34 +0000

The criticality of these articles are unacceptable to compare with spiritual level of the Dalai Lama. “His daughter, who worked in the “Tibetan Government in Exile”, was then kept as a hostage.” Firstly, the thing the media writes to get publicity is stupid! Stooping so low as such by twisting the actions of a high lama. Putting him at such a low position as holding someone’s daughter at ‘hostage’. What is that?

Never in the world I have seen such criticism to the Dalai Lama, who gave up everything to serve his country through peace. Isn’t that all we need right now? peace? Dorje Shugden and the Dalai Lama was never at rivalry and also It is unacceptable to put such words in the Dalai Lama’s mouth ” Before teachings in recent years, the self-claimed tolerant spiritual leader usually asked Dorje Shugden worshippers not to attend his ceremonies”. I look up to the dalai lama, he has too much wisdom to even consider to be “like us”. He is a buddha, that even his faulty actions would lead to better things in the long run.

By: negra orquida

negra orquida — Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:25:00 +0000

These 2 articles paint a very cynical picture of the Dalai Lama, reducing his compassionate spiritual works to mere politics, fake democracy and witch hunting for personal gain and name. The writers have not done their research at all and dare to insinuate that the Dalai Lama is a manipulative control freak!

The 1st article seem to want to claim credit for China for being the key factor in the recognition and support/survival of the Dalai Lama lineage. Which I think is rather silly and shows the ignorance of the writer… a Buddha/Boddhisatva doesn’t need recognition from anyone… it is the person’s (in this case the relevant Chinese emperors) merit for being able to see the qualities of the Buddha/Boddhisatva and appreciate it and to place high value on it.

“An angry Emperor Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty (1644-1911) once decreed to stop reincarnation of a rebellious Tibetan Buddhist lama, which left his sect dying out.”

If the writer had studied the Lamrim, she would have known that the sect of “a rebellious Tibetan Buddhist Lama” had died out not because of Emperor Qianlong’s decree, but is due to the magnitude of the bad karma/exhaustion of collective merit from the actions taken by the Emperor out of anger at the Lama. As if they can control the freewill of a being who can control his death and rebirth! In any case, I’m not sure why they brought another Tibetan Buddhist Lama in the picture since they are talking about the Dalai Lama.

From the 2nd article: “a scholar who resided in Japan once criticized the Dalai Lama in his piece of work, and he was immediately revenged by pouring inks and spitting at his face. His daughter, who worked in the “Tibetan Government in Exile”, was then kept as a hostage “ → has anyone seen the original report of this incident? Sounds like a crazy blatant twist of untruths, otherwise they would give more details of the incident.