<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has the Gelug lineage lost its effectiveness?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/</link>
	<description>The Protector whose time has come</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manisha Kudo</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-52655</link>
		<dc:creator>Manisha Kudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-52655</guid>
		<description>To outwardly point out that one&#039;s Guru and lineage is wrong about the practice of Dorje Shugden is not something radical in the Western culture because in this time and age, we are encouraged to question, investigate and challenge everything and everyone. However this goes against the very grain of Guru Devotion that is prevalent in Tibetan Buddhism and Hinduism. What the Dalai Lama has done in this instance is that he has applied the Western inquisitorial system to impose the ban but expect devotion from his people regarding his action and direction. When we examine this deeper based on this amazingly well-written essay, if the Dalai Lama could accuse his teachers of being wrong, then he must also be fallible and can be wrong about Dorje Shugden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To outwardly point out that one&#8217;s Guru and lineage is wrong about the practice of Dorje Shugden is not something radical in the Western culture because in this time and age, we are encouraged to question, investigate and challenge everything and everyone. However this goes against the very grain of Guru Devotion that is prevalent in Tibetan Buddhism and Hinduism. What the Dalai Lama has done in this instance is that he has applied the Western inquisitorial system to impose the ban but expect devotion from his people regarding his action and direction. When we examine this deeper based on this amazingly well-written essay, if the Dalai Lama could accuse his teachers of being wrong, then he must also be fallible and can be wrong about Dorje Shugden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loyal soulja</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28654</link>
		<dc:creator>loyal soulja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28654</guid>
		<description>Dekyi la,
I think tenpa is here implying about the fact that the article says BAN imposed on shugden, Which definately is not true. Anyway when you say that you know the inside story what do you mean? Zemay Tulku in his books writes about How Shugden harms people who are practicing nyingma traditions(he even claims Rating Rinpoche was killed by Shugden), Killings and fighting with Nyingma Practitioners in Tibet are very well documented during the time of phapongka in his bit to revive Geluk against the popular REMI movement.  More over I don&#039;t think tenpa is talking about conversion of nyingma into buddhism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dekyi la,<br />
I think tenpa is here implying about the fact that the article says BAN imposed on shugden, Which definately is not true. Anyway when you say that you know the inside story what do you mean? Zemay Tulku in his books writes about How Shugden harms people who are practicing nyingma traditions(he even claims Rating Rinpoche was killed by Shugden), Killings and fighting with Nyingma Practitioners in Tibet are very well documented during the time of phapongka in his bit to revive Geluk against the popular REMI movement.  More over I don&#8217;t think tenpa is talking about conversion of nyingma into buddhism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorje Pakmo</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorje Pakmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 10:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28602</guid>
		<description>After reading this article, I find that the author have written something that cannot be denied. Simpy because the TRUTH cannot be DENIED. It is a well researched article that bring readers on a journey tracing back to the very root of Gelug Lineage and it&#039;s practice. This article is written in a very neutral stand that is not hitting out at anybody but prompting the readers to think, and check the logic of the ban of Dorje Shugden&#039;s practice. 

Is it even logical to say that all the Lineage Guru of the Gelug School was wrong about this practice? If yes, then what happened? Have the entire Gelug Lineage been wrong all this while? And if so, then there shouldn&#039;t be any results no matter how well or diligent they practice!

As what Q have said ealier,

&quot;If great masters like Trijang Rinpoche, Pabongka Rinpoche, Ling Rinpoche and many others, have lost their refuge; then they are no longer qualified to teach the Dharma, because refuge vows is the very basis of all vows, therefore they would have lost their monk vows too. If they are no longer able to teach the Dharma then all of their commentaries, compositions, and Khamtsens should be removed from the monasteries. Their holy stupa which contains these great master’s relics too must be removed from Gaden Shartse Monastery. But this is not the case; in fact their holy stupas are constantly being restored, and Buddhists still strongly believe them to be enlightened masters. The contradictory actions towards this claim is just too immense, no wonder there is constant unrest among the Tibetan community, since their leaders passes comments about this sensitive issue in such flippant ways.

Even the Dalai Lama will not be spared from this broken lineage as both of his root Gurus are strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. Therefore, if the Gelugpa lineage is broken and void of blessings, then all its practitioners should show lack of transformation, and in fact show signs of degeneration. However, that is not the case, for the Dalai Lama has reached millions of people across the globe and changed their lives for the better. That must mean that the lineage is unbroken and, the effectiveness and blessings of these great past Dorje Shugden masters is still intact.&quot;

It&#039;s a very good article for people that do not understand fully the severeness of supporting the ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading this article, I find that the author have written something that cannot be denied. Simpy because the TRUTH cannot be DENIED. It is a well researched article that bring readers on a journey tracing back to the very root of Gelug Lineage and it&#8217;s practice. This article is written in a very neutral stand that is not hitting out at anybody but prompting the readers to think, and check the logic of the ban of Dorje Shugden&#8217;s practice. </p>
<p>Is it even logical to say that all the Lineage Guru of the Gelug School was wrong about this practice? If yes, then what happened? Have the entire Gelug Lineage been wrong all this while? And if so, then there shouldn&#8217;t be any results no matter how well or diligent they practice!</p>
<p>As what Q have said ealier,</p>
<p>&#8220;If great masters like Trijang Rinpoche, Pabongka Rinpoche, Ling Rinpoche and many others, have lost their refuge; then they are no longer qualified to teach the Dharma, because refuge vows is the very basis of all vows, therefore they would have lost their monk vows too. If they are no longer able to teach the Dharma then all of their commentaries, compositions, and Khamtsens should be removed from the monasteries. Their holy stupa which contains these great master’s relics too must be removed from Gaden Shartse Monastery. But this is not the case; in fact their holy stupas are constantly being restored, and Buddhists still strongly believe them to be enlightened masters. The contradictory actions towards this claim is just too immense, no wonder there is constant unrest among the Tibetan community, since their leaders passes comments about this sensitive issue in such flippant ways.</p>
<p>Even the Dalai Lama will not be spared from this broken lineage as both of his root Gurus are strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. Therefore, if the Gelugpa lineage is broken and void of blessings, then all its practitioners should show lack of transformation, and in fact show signs of degeneration. However, that is not the case, for the Dalai Lama has reached millions of people across the globe and changed their lives for the better. That must mean that the lineage is unbroken and, the effectiveness and blessings of these great past Dorje Shugden masters is still intact.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very good article for people that do not understand fully the severeness of supporting the ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28594</link>
		<dc:creator>Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28594</guid>
		<description>The “Has the Gelug lineage lost its effectiveness?” article on dorjeshugden.com is a very sophisticated article written in an authoritative style by a well focused and informed writer. Syntax, word choice, and flow of ideas are generally outstanding. Development of the article is very good, with sufficient ideas, facts and examples to support what the author wishes to get across to the readers, all points are largely supported by undeniable truth and facts that is well documented in various scholastic sources. It is clear that the author wishes to put his point across without swaying the readers to his viewpoint, instead it is composed in such a way to encourage the readers to think deeper and examine the truth behind the issue that was discussed. This can be seen as the author leaves an open conclusion for the readers to decide, through linking in with a recent article of the same nature. 

The ban on Dorje Shugden practice has been one of the most talked about and debated topic, regardless of the school of Buddhism, this is a well known issue within the Buddhist world. Despite the ban, many people continue to be faithful to Dorje Shugden practice, keeping the lineage that was passed down from their Gurus although they face the dangers of being ostracized and even death threats. This is a very admirable quality in a Buddhist practitioner, having unconditioned guru devotion is one of the pinnacle in Tibetan Buddhist practice; however these faithful practitioners, instead of being respected for their firmness in upholding the traditions passed down by their root Guru, to the contrary, they were beaten down physically, mentally and spiritually by many pro-Dalai Lamaists and even the CTA. 

Dorje Shugden was widely practiced in the Gelug tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, and even practiced (if not respected) by other traditions such as the Sakyas, Nyigmas and Kagyus. Being the most effective protector of our time, it is not strange that many high reincarnated lamas practices and have unmovable faith in Dorje Shugden as the protector of the Gelug tradition. Dorje Shugden was so revered and well loved by holy masters such as H.H. Ling Rinpoche, H.H. Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche, H.H. Kyabje Dragri Dorje Chang and many more; that they composed beautiful poems in praise of Dorje Shugden, perpetuating His holy blessings for the flourish of Je Tsongkhapa’s lineage to the world. 

Although the freedom of practicing Dorje Shugden can be fought through human rights activities, in this article, the focus is purely directed to Buddhist practitioners to show them that with debate and proof; denying the supremacy of Dorje Shugden as an enlightened Dharma protector directly jeopardize the standing of the Gelug tradition in infinite ways. The effects of banning Dorje Shugden practice although it has a severe impact on lay practitioners such as denying them the rights of religious freedom and their tradition of revering the King of Protectors; however it is a much different story for ordained monks and those with Tantric practices of the Gelug lineage, for proclaiming Dorje Shugden as an unenlightened being would cut the very root of the lineage blessings and wither all Dharma practice that came 350 years ago when Dorje Shugden was first practiced.

The truth is, prohibiting or downgrading Dorje Shugden and His holy practice does not only affect Dorje Shugden practitioners. In reality, those who have given up his practice do not live a happy spiritual life either. Their constant deep seated fear and anger towards DS practitioners has led them to conduct many misdeeds, including laying hands on ordained monks and destroying the lives of families who practices Dorje Shugden; these deeds were well documented and the oppression has gained international attention. 

Putting aside the morale downfall of pro-dalai lamaist and the CTA; the sanctity of their spiritual practice is not preserved either due to this ban. Proclaiming Dorje Shugden practice as invalid is similar to destroying the very core of Gelug practice as it would mean that all the lineage masters from 350 years ago, which we pay homage to (including the Dalai Lama and other great masters of our time) is at fault. 

The Dalai Lama and the CTA has announced publicly, that those who practice Dorje Shugden have lost their refuge vows, which is the very foundation of receiving all higher practices. If one has lost the very basic vows they made, the 3 higher set of vows will also automatically be nullified. In Tibetan Buddhism, taking the set of vows is the most important aspect to gain the blessings of the lineage and for learned monks to pass down the tradition to the newer generation. The lineage system in Tibetan Buddhism tells us where the teaching comes from and approves the authenticity of the teaching, in fact it is so important that before any Dharma teaching can commence, the Dharma teacher have to mention from where and when he or she has received this teaching, and then explain the lineage of which how that particular teaching has been passed down all the way back to Shakyamuni’s time. 

Since all who practices Dorje Shugden have lost their refuge vows, that would make all the great masters of the Gelug tradition from 350 years ago has lost their refuge vows too, leaving a huge void within the lineage system. However, that seems to be not the case as in the supplication prayers recited daily by all Buddhists contains the names of Trijang Rinpoche and Pabongka Rinpoche, both whom are well known to be strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. The question here is based on the selectiveness of the application of this ban, that the double standards and hypocrisy towards Dorje Shugden practice is illogical. If Dorje Shugden followers lose their refuge vows just like how the Dalai Lama and CTA claims, then such claims should apply even to the great masters that once practiced it in the past. The laws of the universe is after similar to karma, no one is spared from the truth, if it is the real truth. 

If great masters like Trijang Rinpoche, Pabongka Rinpoche, Ling Rinpoche and many others, have lost their refuge; then they are no longer qualified to teach the Dharma, because refuge vows is the very basis of all vows, therefore they would have lost their monk vows too. If they are no longer able to teach the Dharma then all of their commentaries, compositions, and Khamtsens should be removed from the monasteries. Their holy stupa which contains these great master’s relics too must be removed from Gaden Shartse Monastery. But this is not the case; in fact their holy stupas are constantly being restored, and Buddhists still strongly believe them to be enlightened masters. The contradictory actions towards this claim is just too immense, no wonder there is constant unrest among the Tibetan community, since their leaders passes comments about this sensitive issue in such flippant ways.

Even the Dalai Lama will not be spared from this broken lineage as both of his root Gurus are strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. Therefore, if the Gelugpa lineage is broken and void of blessings, then all its practitioners should show lack of transformation, and in fact show signs of degeneration. However, that is not the case, for the Dalai Lama has reached millions of people across the globe and changed their lives for the better. That must mean that the lineage is unbroken and, the effectiveness and blessings of these great past Dorje Shugden masters is still intact. 

The ban on Dorje Shugden is not just a matter of whether one chooses the Dalai Lama over Dorje Shugden or vice versa. It has a deeper meaning to it and it is one that affects us as Gelugpas no matter which side we take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The “Has the Gelug lineage lost its effectiveness?” article on dorjeshugden.com is a very sophisticated article written in an authoritative style by a well focused and informed writer. Syntax, word choice, and flow of ideas are generally outstanding. Development of the article is very good, with sufficient ideas, facts and examples to support what the author wishes to get across to the readers, all points are largely supported by undeniable truth and facts that is well documented in various scholastic sources. It is clear that the author wishes to put his point across without swaying the readers to his viewpoint, instead it is composed in such a way to encourage the readers to think deeper and examine the truth behind the issue that was discussed. This can be seen as the author leaves an open conclusion for the readers to decide, through linking in with a recent article of the same nature. </p>
<p>The ban on Dorje Shugden practice has been one of the most talked about and debated topic, regardless of the school of Buddhism, this is a well known issue within the Buddhist world. Despite the ban, many people continue to be faithful to Dorje Shugden practice, keeping the lineage that was passed down from their Gurus although they face the dangers of being ostracized and even death threats. This is a very admirable quality in a Buddhist practitioner, having unconditioned guru devotion is one of the pinnacle in Tibetan Buddhist practice; however these faithful practitioners, instead of being respected for their firmness in upholding the traditions passed down by their root Guru, to the contrary, they were beaten down physically, mentally and spiritually by many pro-Dalai Lamaists and even the CTA. </p>
<p>Dorje Shugden was widely practiced in the Gelug tradition of Tibetan Buddhism, and even practiced (if not respected) by other traditions such as the Sakyas, Nyigmas and Kagyus. Being the most effective protector of our time, it is not strange that many high reincarnated lamas practices and have unmovable faith in Dorje Shugden as the protector of the Gelug tradition. Dorje Shugden was so revered and well loved by holy masters such as H.H. Ling Rinpoche, H.H. Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche, H.H. Kyabje Dragri Dorje Chang and many more; that they composed beautiful poems in praise of Dorje Shugden, perpetuating His holy blessings for the flourish of Je Tsongkhapa’s lineage to the world. </p>
<p>Although the freedom of practicing Dorje Shugden can be fought through human rights activities, in this article, the focus is purely directed to Buddhist practitioners to show them that with debate and proof; denying the supremacy of Dorje Shugden as an enlightened Dharma protector directly jeopardize the standing of the Gelug tradition in infinite ways. The effects of banning Dorje Shugden practice although it has a severe impact on lay practitioners such as denying them the rights of religious freedom and their tradition of revering the King of Protectors; however it is a much different story for ordained monks and those with Tantric practices of the Gelug lineage, for proclaiming Dorje Shugden as an unenlightened being would cut the very root of the lineage blessings and wither all Dharma practice that came 350 years ago when Dorje Shugden was first practiced.</p>
<p>The truth is, prohibiting or downgrading Dorje Shugden and His holy practice does not only affect Dorje Shugden practitioners. In reality, those who have given up his practice do not live a happy spiritual life either. Their constant deep seated fear and anger towards DS practitioners has led them to conduct many misdeeds, including laying hands on ordained monks and destroying the lives of families who practices Dorje Shugden; these deeds were well documented and the oppression has gained international attention. </p>
<p>Putting aside the morale downfall of pro-dalai lamaist and the CTA; the sanctity of their spiritual practice is not preserved either due to this ban. Proclaiming Dorje Shugden practice as invalid is similar to destroying the very core of Gelug practice as it would mean that all the lineage masters from 350 years ago, which we pay homage to (including the Dalai Lama and other great masters of our time) is at fault. </p>
<p>The Dalai Lama and the CTA has announced publicly, that those who practice Dorje Shugden have lost their refuge vows, which is the very foundation of receiving all higher practices. If one has lost the very basic vows they made, the 3 higher set of vows will also automatically be nullified. In Tibetan Buddhism, taking the set of vows is the most important aspect to gain the blessings of the lineage and for learned monks to pass down the tradition to the newer generation. The lineage system in Tibetan Buddhism tells us where the teaching comes from and approves the authenticity of the teaching, in fact it is so important that before any Dharma teaching can commence, the Dharma teacher have to mention from where and when he or she has received this teaching, and then explain the lineage of which how that particular teaching has been passed down all the way back to Shakyamuni’s time. </p>
<p>Since all who practices Dorje Shugden have lost their refuge vows, that would make all the great masters of the Gelug tradition from 350 years ago has lost their refuge vows too, leaving a huge void within the lineage system. However, that seems to be not the case as in the supplication prayers recited daily by all Buddhists contains the names of Trijang Rinpoche and Pabongka Rinpoche, both whom are well known to be strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. The question here is based on the selectiveness of the application of this ban, that the double standards and hypocrisy towards Dorje Shugden practice is illogical. If Dorje Shugden followers lose their refuge vows just like how the Dalai Lama and CTA claims, then such claims should apply even to the great masters that once practiced it in the past. The laws of the universe is after similar to karma, no one is spared from the truth, if it is the real truth. </p>
<p>If great masters like Trijang Rinpoche, Pabongka Rinpoche, Ling Rinpoche and many others, have lost their refuge; then they are no longer qualified to teach the Dharma, because refuge vows is the very basis of all vows, therefore they would have lost their monk vows too. If they are no longer able to teach the Dharma then all of their commentaries, compositions, and Khamtsens should be removed from the monasteries. Their holy stupa which contains these great master’s relics too must be removed from Gaden Shartse Monastery. But this is not the case; in fact their holy stupas are constantly being restored, and Buddhists still strongly believe them to be enlightened masters. The contradictory actions towards this claim is just too immense, no wonder there is constant unrest among the Tibetan community, since their leaders passes comments about this sensitive issue in such flippant ways.</p>
<p>Even the Dalai Lama will not be spared from this broken lineage as both of his root Gurus are strong Dorje Shugden practitioners. Therefore, if the Gelugpa lineage is broken and void of blessings, then all its practitioners should show lack of transformation, and in fact show signs of degeneration. However, that is not the case, for the Dalai Lama has reached millions of people across the globe and changed their lives for the better. That must mean that the lineage is unbroken and, the effectiveness and blessings of these great past Dorje Shugden masters is still intact. </p>
<p>The ban on Dorje Shugden is not just a matter of whether one chooses the Dalai Lama over Dorje Shugden or vice versa. It has a deeper meaning to it and it is one that affects us as Gelugpas no matter which side we take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jungney Doaremon</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jungney Doaremon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28591</guid>
		<description>The writer did not even know the term Buddhists / Buddhism means, purely based on externalist point of view to distract both buddhists and non buddhists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The writer did not even know the term Buddhists / Buddhism means, purely based on externalist point of view to distract both buddhists and non buddhists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dekyi</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28589</link>
		<dc:creator>Dekyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28589</guid>
		<description>Dear Tenpa,

It is sad you didn&#039;t understand the whole message of this article. Your comment shows clearly you better read the article a few times again. 

His Holiness Kyabje Pabongka Rinpoche can never convert any Nyingma Monasteries. What power does he have to convert over? He cannot force them. He is not the King or ruler. He cannot force them to convert. This rumour is silly and unfounded and you perpetuating the rumour shows you are not here to practice Dharma but to listen to gossip.

If there was conversion, then it is the monks themselves who are unstable and not learned to be so flighty. Contemplate deeper. 

I am a Tibetan and I also know the inside story. And Pabongka Rinpoche was a lama of the highest caliber. Samkyi Mikyaba as the HH Dalai Lama has said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tenpa,</p>
<p>It is sad you didn&#8217;t understand the whole message of this article. Your comment shows clearly you better read the article a few times again. </p>
<p>His Holiness Kyabje Pabongka Rinpoche can never convert any Nyingma Monasteries. What power does he have to convert over? He cannot force them. He is not the King or ruler. He cannot force them to convert. This rumour is silly and unfounded and you perpetuating the rumour shows you are not here to practice Dharma but to listen to gossip.</p>
<p>If there was conversion, then it is the monks themselves who are unstable and not learned to be so flighty. Contemplate deeper. </p>
<p>I am a Tibetan and I also know the inside story. And Pabongka Rinpoche was a lama of the highest caliber. Samkyi Mikyaba as the HH Dalai Lama has said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenpa</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28588</link>
		<dc:creator>tenpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 17:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28588</guid>
		<description>Its sad, even now you have&#039;t stopped lying yet, there is a shugden monastery just in front of my house and they have never stopped, no one is coming to ban them. its just that when a geluk lama, who don&#039;t follow shugden is teachings, they don&#039;t go to receive teachings and vice versa, i mean whats the point of receiving a teaching from someone who you don&#039;t listen to, especially wangs and lung where samaya is very important. 
 About Penchen Lama practicing shugden, even his holiness Dalai Lama did practice shugden but later when he realize, it is wrong he stopped. Its Buddha Dharma not some cult dharma, every mistake can be amended and every being&#039;s buddha nature can be purified with the correct causes and conditions. just like the cause of greed for power and wealth made phapongka destroy many nyingma monasteries and kill many monks or just like the cause like greed and ego that let zeamey to write that cult book that caused so many problem for the pure dharma lineage of Je Tsongkhapa.    Don&#039;t worry about geluk Lineage, we have pure khadampa teachers like Ling Rinpoche, Rating Rinpoche and Of cause His Holiness Dalai lama. No matter what Geluk will never die and flourish even more around the world no matter what you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its sad, even now you have&#8217;t stopped lying yet, there is a shugden monastery just in front of my house and they have never stopped, no one is coming to ban them. its just that when a geluk lama, who don&#8217;t follow shugden is teachings, they don&#8217;t go to receive teachings and vice versa, i mean whats the point of receiving a teaching from someone who you don&#8217;t listen to, especially wangs and lung where samaya is very important.<br />
 About Penchen Lama practicing shugden, even his holiness Dalai Lama did practice shugden but later when he realize, it is wrong he stopped. Its Buddha Dharma not some cult dharma, every mistake can be amended and every being&#8217;s buddha nature can be purified with the correct causes and conditions. just like the cause of greed for power and wealth made phapongka destroy many nyingma monasteries and kill many monks or just like the cause like greed and ego that let zeamey to write that cult book that caused so many problem for the pure dharma lineage of Je Tsongkhapa.    Don&#8217;t worry about geluk Lineage, we have pure khadampa teachers like Ling Rinpoche, Rating Rinpoche and Of cause His Holiness Dalai lama. No matter what Geluk will never die and flourish even more around the world no matter what you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Uncle</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28586</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Uncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28586</guid>
		<description>I am flabbergasted because I am simply amazed at the anonymous writer who wrote this article. The article implies heavy consequences for those advocating and enforcing the ban on Dorje Shugden. I have heard most people talk about the nasty things (which are not true) about Dorje Shugden but few really understand the Protector’s history and lineage.  

After reading this article, I find that the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition is undermined by the Dorje Shugden ban. The very fact that these lamas who advocated Dorje Shugden practice in the first place like Kyabje Pabongka Rinpoche and Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche are the main Gelug lineage lamas of our time. That means that they are the foremost holders of the Gelug tradition and every teaching from them should be faultless. However, the ban implies that the lineage lamas themselves made a huge mistake about Dorje Shugden. 

If the lineage lamas made a mistake about something as important as a Dharma Protector, then they could have made a mistake about all other important lineage teachings as well.  That’s a very dangerous path to tread because all the other practices and teachings within the Gelug tradition could have been a mistake as well because there’s no Lama within the Gelug tradition that has not directly or indirectly received teachings, lineages and so forth from these great lamas. 

That means many important lineage teachings like the Lamrim and Tantric practices like Vajrayogini, Yamantaka and Heruka that descend from these great Lamas could also be wrong. Some like the Vajrayogini sadhana were composed by Pabongka Rinpoche based upon divine visions he has of her. On the other hand, the Dalai Lama continues to teach and pass these teachings down and some like the Vajrayogini Sadhana is the same sadhana that the Dalai Lama recites every single day. 

At the end of the day, the ban undermines not just the spiritual authority of the lineage Lamas but the whole Gelug tradition as well. I find this a very compelling logic to dispel the basis of the Dorje Shugden ban. After reading this, I think the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition would be in trouble if the ban continues to be enforced. 

Therefore, there’s much urgency that people come to understand the gravity of the Dorje Shugden ban and how it implicates the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am flabbergasted because I am simply amazed at the anonymous writer who wrote this article. The article implies heavy consequences for those advocating and enforcing the ban on Dorje Shugden. I have heard most people talk about the nasty things (which are not true) about Dorje Shugden but few really understand the Protector’s history and lineage.  </p>
<p>After reading this article, I find that the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition is undermined by the Dorje Shugden ban. The very fact that these lamas who advocated Dorje Shugden practice in the first place like Kyabje Pabongka Rinpoche and Kyabje Trijang Rinpoche are the main Gelug lineage lamas of our time. That means that they are the foremost holders of the Gelug tradition and every teaching from them should be faultless. However, the ban implies that the lineage lamas themselves made a huge mistake about Dorje Shugden. </p>
<p>If the lineage lamas made a mistake about something as important as a Dharma Protector, then they could have made a mistake about all other important lineage teachings as well.  That’s a very dangerous path to tread because all the other practices and teachings within the Gelug tradition could have been a mistake as well because there’s no Lama within the Gelug tradition that has not directly or indirectly received teachings, lineages and so forth from these great lamas. </p>
<p>That means many important lineage teachings like the Lamrim and Tantric practices like Vajrayogini, Yamantaka and Heruka that descend from these great Lamas could also be wrong. Some like the Vajrayogini sadhana were composed by Pabongka Rinpoche based upon divine visions he has of her. On the other hand, the Dalai Lama continues to teach and pass these teachings down and some like the Vajrayogini Sadhana is the same sadhana that the Dalai Lama recites every single day. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, the ban undermines not just the spiritual authority of the lineage Lamas but the whole Gelug tradition as well. I find this a very compelling logic to dispel the basis of the Dorje Shugden ban. After reading this, I think the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition would be in trouble if the ban continues to be enforced. </p>
<p>Therefore, there’s much urgency that people come to understand the gravity of the Dorje Shugden ban and how it implicates the spiritual authority of the Gelug tradition as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jungney Doraemon</title>
		<link>https://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/has-the-gelug-lineage-lost-its-effectiveness/comment-page-1/#comment-28553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jungney Doraemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=24046#comment-28553</guid>
		<description>The more buddhists debate over the practices of other buddhism sects, the more defilement it is being evoked.

According to some adherents, it is correct to consider Dorje Shugden as an emanation of Manjushri but not one who shows the aspect of a worldly being. 

The form of Dorje Shugden is supposed to reveal the complete stages of the path of Sutra and Tantra, and such qualities are not possessed by the forms of worldly beings. Dorje Shugden appears as a fully ordained monk to show that the practice of pure moral discipline is essential for those who wish to attain enlightenment.  In his left hand, he holds a human heart  to symbolize great compassion and spontaneous great bliss – the essence of all the stages of the vast path of Sutra and Tantra. His round yellow hat (Tib. sakshu) represents the view of Nagarjuna, and the wave-shaped sword (Tib. chula) in his right hand teaches us to sever ignorance, the root of samsara, with the sharp blade of wisdom (like the sword held aloft by Manjushri and Je Tsongkhapa). 
This is the essence of all the stages of the profound path of Sutra and Tantra. He rides a snow lion, symbolizing the four fearlessnesses of a Buddha. Even Dorje Shugden&#039;s form reveals the complete stages of the path of Sutra and Tantra, and such qualities are not possessed by the forms of worldly beings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more buddhists debate over the practices of other buddhism sects, the more defilement it is being evoked.</p>
<p>According to some adherents, it is correct to consider Dorje Shugden as an emanation of Manjushri but not one who shows the aspect of a worldly being. </p>
<p>The form of Dorje Shugden is supposed to reveal the complete stages of the path of Sutra and Tantra, and such qualities are not possessed by the forms of worldly beings. Dorje Shugden appears as a fully ordained monk to show that the practice of pure moral discipline is essential for those who wish to attain enlightenment.  In his left hand, he holds a human heart  to symbolize great compassion and spontaneous great bliss – the essence of all the stages of the vast path of Sutra and Tantra. His round yellow hat (Tib. sakshu) represents the view of Nagarjuna, and the wave-shaped sword (Tib. chula) in his right hand teaches us to sever ignorance, the root of samsara, with the sharp blade of wisdom (like the sword held aloft by Manjushri and Je Tsongkhapa).<br />
This is the essence of all the stages of the profound path of Sutra and Tantra. He rides a snow lion, symbolizing the four fearlessnesses of a Buddha. Even Dorje Shugden&#8217;s form reveals the complete stages of the path of Sutra and Tantra, and such qualities are not possessed by the forms of worldly beings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
