Author Topic: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?  (Read 339 times)

dsnowlion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« on: August 23, 2019, 02:40:36 PM »
Well, finally an end to the hearing of this case which has obviously been intentionally dragged out... based on the report, it appears that both parties didn’t really introduce anything (new points or facts). Now, the question is how long before the verdict comes out?

Looks like Penpa Tsering can't really do much to his rival, even if he is at fault. The news report shows Sikyong will most likely get away with what he did. He seems to be not bothered one bit and instead, he is even arrogant about it. From the way the commission responded as to "why the Sikyong never attended a single hearing?" he said Sikyong neither has the time nor the need to attend to such trivial issue while he is taking care of the larger cause of Tibet and enumerated his recent activities visiting England, Baroda, the second Five-Fifty Youth Forum and successfully getting the Tibetan flag hoisted the Bell of Peace parliament to permanently raise Tibet’s flag in its parliament as sign that he is busy.

Wow-what huge slap on Penpa's face. It is kinda like putting Penpa down isn't it? Like it is Penpa the one that's being "petty" here. I doubt this is going to sit easy on Penpa and I don't think the drama is quite over yet. Somehow I don't think Penpa will stop until creating havoc for Sangay even if the court favours him. I guess we better lookout for more drama within the CTA coming.

Quote
Case No. 20 wraps up hearing, verdict awaited

DHARAMSHALA, August 21: Case No. 20 wraps up its last hearing today at the Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission (TSJC) after two and a half months.

The hearing today covered the eighth and the last issue of “facts” that needed the Kashag to prove how the former representative exhibited trust deficit, underperformance and insubordination while the plaintiff needs to prove how the defendant’s varied clarifications undermined his sincerity, ability, and good conduct.

The plaintiff enumerated the course of events since his appointment as the Representative following the 2016 Sikyong election to his termination up until now, substantiating all points, major and minor, that “maligned his image.”

After the last argument, the Chief Justice Commissioner, in the conclusion statement said both parties in the case, in accordance with provisions of article 48 of Tibetan Civil Procedural Code, were accorded the opportunity to submit proofs, and argue out the eight issues of facts and two issues of law.

The commission will now revisit the proceedings of all the hearings from the recording and study again before coming to a decision which is expected to take some time.

Responding to why the Sikyong never attended a single hearing, he said Sikyong neither has the time nor the need to attend to such trivial issue while he is taking care of the larger cause of Tibet and enumerated his recent activities visiting England, Baroda, the second Five-Fifty Youth Forum and successfully getting the Tibetan flag hoisted the Bell of Peace parliament to permanently raise Tibet’s flag in its parliament as sign that he is busy.

He chose not to respond to the question of if the Kashag would meet the demand of the plaintiff in case of latter’s victory but admitted that the proceeding of the case was peaceful and orderly.

Plaintiff’s Lawyer Namgyal Tsekyi said the party is confident that they have proved 90% of the issues in the case. Responding to media’s question about how the case may affect the maintenance of public order, she said it is one’s basic right to go to court to seek justice and the public and Kashag alike has the responsibility to respect the verdict of the court.

Source: http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?id=41693&article=Case+No.+20+wraps+up+hearing%2c+verdict+awaited

Tracy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 395
Re: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2019, 09:35:28 AM »
From this court case we can see that CTA is controlled by one person, the law and the constitution is only a paper guideline. No one can do anything to Lobsang Sangay, as long as he remains as the president. Is CTA really a democratic government or run by a dictator?

Lobsang Sangay is so arrogant, not only he did not attend the hearing and apologise for that. He had to add on to say he is busy doing something more important, i.e. to free Tibet. After so many years, he has not made any progress in free Tibet movement. The worse part is, more countries are cutting their ties with Tibetans and also stop providing them financial aid.

If Tibetans want to make things different, if they want to have a better future, they have to unite and put pressure on CTA. Lobsang Sangay has to know he is the employee of the people, he is not the ruler of the Tibetans in exile.

dsnowlion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
Re: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2019, 03:05:30 PM »
From this court case we can see that CTA is controlled by one person, the law and the constitution is only a paper guideline. No one can do anything to Lobsang Sangay, as long as he remains as the president. Is CTA really a democratic government or run by a dictator?

Lobsang Sangay is so arrogant, not only he did not attend the hearing and apologise for that. He had to add on to say he is busy doing something more important, i.e. to free Tibet. After so many years, he has not made any progress in free Tibet movement. The worse part is, more countries are cutting their ties with Tibetans and also stop providing them financial aid.

If Tibetans want to make things different, if they want to have a better future, they have to unite and put pressure on CTA. Lobsang Sangay has to know he is the employee of the people, he is not the ruler of the Tibetans in exile.

Yup some guts he has there... basically dismissing Penpa Tsering and putting him down a second time! Huge slap on Penpa's face and I am sure he and his people will not be happy about this. When he said he is busy, it is almost telling Penpa he is just a small fly and doesn't deserve him time or attention. What court? It's definitely being controled by you know who... so basically we're looking at a FAKE democracy administration here.

Ringo Starr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
    • Email
Re: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2019, 06:08:22 AM »
It is very clear that the "democracy" the Tibetan leadership conveniently professes to be, is just a marketing tool to market its pretty darn obvious independence movement for Tibet.

The three pillars of democracy are the legislature, executive, and judiciary.

By showing disrespect to the third pillar (by not showing up), the Sikyong's version of the three pillars are Sikyong, Sikyong and Sikyong.

Heil Sikyong!


;D ;D ;D

dsnowlion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
Re: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2019, 02:17:32 AM »
It is very clear that the "democracy" the Tibetan leadership conveniently professes to be, is just a marketing tool to market its pretty darn obvious independence movement for Tibet.

The three pillars of democracy are the legislature, executive, and judiciary.

By showing disrespect to the third pillar (by not showing up), the Sikyong's version of the three pillars are Sikyong, Sikyong and Sikyong.

Heil Sikyong!


;D ;D ;D

Hahaha this is so hilarious and absolutely true! I wonder will Tibetans have the guts to stand up for something different this time in their next coming elections or will they just follow the Yes man mentality and follow the crowd? I wonder if His Holiness realises he did a huge mistake with this one... or did he not? Hmmmm  ???

Everything is pre-meditated with attained beings, isn't it? So that being the logic, if I go along that way, then one can say that maybe the Dalai Lama knew all along this fake Harvard clown Sangay will trigger something that would expose the CTA's black dark dirty skeletons from the dungeons and all truth will be revealed eventually.

What better way to do it then to get the devil to do its own works and expose the demons within Dharamshala? Hmmmm  ???  Thoughts ???

Alex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 590
    • Email
Re: Sikyong does not have time for Penpa's trivial court case?
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2019, 07:53:01 AM »
From this court case we can see that CTA is controlled by one person, the law and the constitution is only a paper guideline. No one can do anything to Lobsang Sangay, as long as he remains as the president. Is CTA really a democratic government or run by a dictator?

Lobsang Sangay is so arrogant, not only he did not attend the hearing and apologise for that. He had to add on to say he is busy doing something more important, i.e. to free Tibet. After so many years, he has not made any progress in free Tibet movement. The worse part is, more countries are cutting their ties with Tibetans and also stop providing them financial aid.

If Tibetans want to make things different, if they want to have a better future, they have to unite and put pressure on CTA. Lobsang Sangay has to know he is the employee of the people, he is not the ruler of the Tibetans in exile.

The CTA is not a democratic body and they are certainly not open for suggestions. They are actually a dictatorship body that only listens to His Holiness the Dalai Lama. No one can ever challenge their authority and those who actually did ended up in a horrible state.

A famous example will be Tulku Drakpa Gyeltsen who was a very famous lama around the 5th Dalai Lama's time. Tulku Drakpa Gyeltsen was a very popular lama back then and his fame even surpassed the 5th Dalai Lama by a little. With jealousy, the 5th Dalai Lama's attendant assassinated this famous lama and confiscated his whole Ladrang.

This will not happen in a democratic country where everyone respects each other's rights. The CTA is still using the same modus operandi even until now. Dorje Shugden ban is discrimination against religion and it breaches the constitution of democracy. Hence, CTA is not a democratic body like how they like to be portrayed as.