<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tibetan leadership sabotages Indian citizenship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/</link>
	<description>The Protector whose time has come</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-928308</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 05:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-928308</guid>
		<description>Lobsang Sangay and the CTA don&#039;t really care for the Tibetans. They seem to be ok to let the Tibetans remain stateless, otherwise, why won&#039;t they work hard to give an identity to the Tibetans. Being stateless means the Tibetans cannot own any property or business in India. If they want to, they have to purchase using a proxy. The risk of using a proxy is that the law may change and their right as the actual owner will not be protected. The stateless Tibetans have to always live in fear and worry. For Lobsang Sangay and the CTA, they will not know how insecure it is to be stateless because all of them are already a citizen of another country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lobsang Sangay and the CTA don&#8217;t really care for the Tibetans. They seem to be ok to let the Tibetans remain stateless, otherwise, why won&#8217;t they work hard to give an identity to the Tibetans. Being stateless means the Tibetans cannot own any property or business in India. If they want to, they have to purchase using a proxy. The risk of using a proxy is that the law may change and their right as the actual owner will not be protected. The stateless Tibetans have to always live in fear and worry. For Lobsang Sangay and the CTA, they will not know how insecure it is to be stateless because all of them are already a citizen of another country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drolma</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-927771</link>
		<dc:creator>Drolma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-927771</guid>
		<description>It is definitely not a blessing to be a refugee or as a stateless person. However, the CTA is happy to maintain the refugee status for the normal Tibetans. But for themselves, they have already gotten a passport from the western countries.

The main reason for the CTA to maintain the refugee status is for them to make easy money. All the CTA cares about is their one interest such as money and power. As a government, they have failed miserably in providing the Tibetans in exile a better life and future. 

China on the other hands wants to make sure the Tibetans are also taken care of. They have invested a lot of money to improve the living conditions in Tibet. Everyone in China has the same right regardless of their ethnical background. Tibet was rather backward 60 years ago but things are different now. Tibet is definitely a better place to live now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is definitely not a blessing to be a refugee or as a stateless person. However, the CTA is happy to maintain the refugee status for the normal Tibetans. But for themselves, they have already gotten a passport from the western countries.</p>
<p>The main reason for the CTA to maintain the refugee status is for them to make easy money. All the CTA cares about is their one interest such as money and power. As a government, they have failed miserably in providing the Tibetans in exile a better life and future. </p>
<p>China on the other hands wants to make sure the Tibetans are also taken care of. They have invested a lot of money to improve the living conditions in Tibet. Everyone in China has the same right regardless of their ethnical background. Tibet was rather backward 60 years ago but things are different now. Tibet is definitely a better place to live now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-926878</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-926878</guid>
		<description>The fact is no one really wants Tibet to be independent, everyone has their own agenda. If Lobsang Sangay and his cronies love Tibet so much, why are they not refugees like their fellow Tibetans in India? Why all of them have a passport from another country? Since they have decided to be the citizen of another country, it means they are not interested in going back to Tibet. 

Lobsang Sangay and the CTA are using the Tibetans to make money, to get free money from the West. They have been earning their living like this, it&#039;s hard for them to give up such an easy way to make money. Therefore, they will not make free Tibet a success. They will only talk but they will never take action.

For the western countries, they also want the Tibetans and Tibet to remain status quo because this is the card for them to irk China and to sabotage China. Without the Tibet cause, there will be one less topic for them to condemn China. The western countries are not so stupid to keep giving money to support a cause that has been going on for the past 60 years and shows no results. All of them have their own agenda. The ones who suffer are the Tibetans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is no one really wants Tibet to be independent, everyone has their own agenda. If Lobsang Sangay and his cronies love Tibet so much, why are they not refugees like their fellow Tibetans in India? Why all of them have a passport from another country? Since they have decided to be the citizen of another country, it means they are not interested in going back to Tibet. </p>
<p>Lobsang Sangay and the CTA are using the Tibetans to make money, to get free money from the West. They have been earning their living like this, it&#8217;s hard for them to give up such an easy way to make money. Therefore, they will not make free Tibet a success. They will only talk but they will never take action.</p>
<p>For the western countries, they also want the Tibetans and Tibet to remain status quo because this is the card for them to irk China and to sabotage China. Without the Tibet cause, there will be one less topic for them to condemn China. The western countries are not so stupid to keep giving money to support a cause that has been going on for the past 60 years and shows no results. All of them have their own agenda. The ones who suffer are the Tibetans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-923831</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-923831</guid>
		<description>Lobsang Sangay and the CTA pays no respect to India government. The Indian government is so kind to offer the Tibetan citizenship but the CTA refuses to issue the documents required to the Tibetans who want to integrate. Not only that, Lobsang Sangay is asking more from the India government!

The Tibetans in exile have been a taker for the past 60 years, that is what they are capable of. They always expect people to help them. They use their plight to earn sympathy and donations for themselves, this is how they survive for the past 60 years.

Lobsang Sangay has no shame, they have taken so much from India and he is still asking for more. While he is asking for more things from India, he does not give anything back. All he has to offer is problem for India. He knows India wants to improve its relationship with China but he still allows his people to protest against China in India. This has put India in a very difficult position. 

The Tibetans in India were also caught cheating the benefit given to them by the Indian government. I am sure Lobsang Sangay is aware of this, what has he done? There was no apology and no action was taken. With an attitude like this, I don&#039;t think India will offer more help to them, Lobsang Sangay can forget about it! While India is still giving the Tibetans opportunity to integrate, the Tibetans better seize the chance!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lobsang Sangay and the CTA pays no respect to India government. The Indian government is so kind to offer the Tibetan citizenship but the CTA refuses to issue the documents required to the Tibetans who want to integrate. Not only that, Lobsang Sangay is asking more from the India government!</p>
<p>The Tibetans in exile have been a taker for the past 60 years, that is what they are capable of. They always expect people to help them. They use their plight to earn sympathy and donations for themselves, this is how they survive for the past 60 years.</p>
<p>Lobsang Sangay has no shame, they have taken so much from India and he is still asking for more. While he is asking for more things from India, he does not give anything back. All he has to offer is problem for India. He knows India wants to improve its relationship with China but he still allows his people to protest against China in India. This has put India in a very difficult position. </p>
<p>The Tibetans in India were also caught cheating the benefit given to them by the Indian government. I am sure Lobsang Sangay is aware of this, what has he done? There was no apology and no action was taken. With an attitude like this, I don&#8217;t think India will offer more help to them, Lobsang Sangay can forget about it! While India is still giving the Tibetans opportunity to integrate, the Tibetans better seize the chance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drolma</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-921810</link>
		<dc:creator>Drolma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2018 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-921810</guid>
		<description>The number of Tibetans in the exile community in India has dropped from 180,000 to 85,000 in 7 years. Fewer and fewer Tibetans are leaving Tibet to come to India. It actually doesn&#039;t make sense anymore to escape from Tibet. The living condition and standard in Tibet have improved so much since the &#039;80s. Life in Tibet is very comfortable now, it will be stupid to come to a foreign land that they are not familiar with and become a stateless refugee. 

I think the CTA and Lobsang Sangay are quite worried about the dropping in the number of Tibetans in India. The fewer the Tibetan refugees, the fewer donations they will be getting. This is one of the reasons why they make it so difficult for the Tibetans in India to integrate. If the number of Tibetans in the exile community keeps dropping, eventually there is no need for an administration anymore. The CTA will have to be dissolved.

The Tibetans in India don&#039;t see any hope in the Free Tibet movement, anyone will lose hope after 60 years of waiting. Since the CTA is not doing anything for the Tibetans or give a proposal to the Tibetans on their future direction, they will just leave. No one wants to sit around and keep waiting. The Tibetans have totally lost their hope in the CTA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of Tibetans in the exile community in India has dropped from 180,000 to 85,000 in 7 years. Fewer and fewer Tibetans are leaving Tibet to come to India. It actually doesn&#8217;t make sense anymore to escape from Tibet. The living condition and standard in Tibet have improved so much since the &#8217;80s. Life in Tibet is very comfortable now, it will be stupid to come to a foreign land that they are not familiar with and become a stateless refugee. </p>
<p>I think the CTA and Lobsang Sangay are quite worried about the dropping in the number of Tibetans in India. The fewer the Tibetan refugees, the fewer donations they will be getting. This is one of the reasons why they make it so difficult for the Tibetans in India to integrate. If the number of Tibetans in the exile community keeps dropping, eventually there is no need for an administration anymore. The CTA will have to be dissolved.</p>
<p>The Tibetans in India don&#8217;t see any hope in the Free Tibet movement, anyone will lose hope after 60 years of waiting. Since the CTA is not doing anything for the Tibetans or give a proposal to the Tibetans on their future direction, they will just leave. No one wants to sit around and keep waiting. The Tibetans have totally lost their hope in the CTA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-921371</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-921371</guid>
		<description>A lot of the Tibetans prefer to go to the western countries, they think they can get a better opportunity there and the west is better than Asia. But they don&#039;t know what they are missing here. Asia is rising as the most powerful economy in the world and after China, India is the next one to rise. There will be so many possibilities and opportunities waiting for them in China and India. Economy in the west is getting from bad to worse, it is a bad choice to go there at this point of time.

Perhaps there are also many Tibetans who want to integrate and become an Indian citizen. But the CTA is not making it any easier. They are trying to stop the Tibetans to take the Indian citizenship by not issuing them documents that are required by the Indian government to process their application. 

I think the reason why the CTA doesn&#039;t want the Tibetans to integrate is that if there is no more Tibetans in exile, what will be their role? They will not be needed anymore. If there are no more refugees, they will not be able to ask for donations from western countries, how are they going to survive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the Tibetans prefer to go to the western countries, they think they can get a better opportunity there and the west is better than Asia. But they don&#8217;t know what they are missing here. Asia is rising as the most powerful economy in the world and after China, India is the next one to rise. There will be so many possibilities and opportunities waiting for them in China and India. Economy in the west is getting from bad to worse, it is a bad choice to go there at this point of time.</p>
<p>Perhaps there are also many Tibetans who want to integrate and become an Indian citizen. But the CTA is not making it any easier. They are trying to stop the Tibetans to take the Indian citizenship by not issuing them documents that are required by the Indian government to process their application. </p>
<p>I think the reason why the CTA doesn&#8217;t want the Tibetans to integrate is that if there is no more Tibetans in exile, what will be their role? They will not be needed anymore. If there are no more refugees, they will not be able to ask for donations from western countries, how are they going to survive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maya</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-652080</link>
		<dc:creator>Maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-652080</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Although the Dalai Lama has offered an apology, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) still expressed their disappointment over his controversial comment on Nehru, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC). Dalai Lama called Nehru self-centred.

The Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;q&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:1.4em;color:red&quot;&gt;Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting controversial information to students: Arunachal Congress&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation: APCC
&#124; DAMIEN LEPCHA &#124; ITANAGAR &#124; August 12, 2018 9:58 pm
disappointment over the recent statement made by Tibetan Spiritual Leader the 14th Dalai Lama in which he called Jawaharlal Nehru, the former Prime Minister of India as “self-centered” and the one responsible for parting India and Pakistan.
“Although Dalai Lama expressed regret over his controversial comment, the APCC is extremely thwarted by it. A Tibetan spiritual leader calling names to an Indian leader who sweated most to keep him and his followers safe from Chinese aggression is simply not acceptable. Today, India is home to lakhs of Tibetan refugees who are living in 37 settlements and 70 scattered communities across different states of India,” APCC vice-president Minkir Lollen said in a statement on Sunday.
“Dalai Lama may have forgotten that India provided a beam of light and hope to Tibetans remaining in Chinese-dominated Tibet and in the neighbouring Chinese provinces politically cut off from the Tibetan heart land. All these happened only because India has great leaders like Gandhi and Nehru who took the responsibility of social burden to shelter thousands of persecuted Tibetans then in 1959,” Lollen added.
Minkir said Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation, hope and trust of millions on record and the same are watching his contribution towards the mankind.
“In such circumstances, Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting partial and controversial information to the students who are the torch bearer of the nation,” the Congress said.
Further stating that the statement of the spiritual leader could be a politically motivated one and made with an effort to approach Prime Minister Narendra Modi for survival of his continuation in the country, the Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.
https://nenow.in/north-east-news/dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.html&lt;/q&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.png&quot; title=&quot;Download: Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information-129x300.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Although the Dalai Lama has offered an apology, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) still expressed their disappointment over his controversial comment on Nehru, the Arunachal Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC). Dalai Lama called Nehru self-centred.</p>
<p>The Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.</b></p>
<p><q><b><span style="font-size:1.4em;color:red">Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting controversial information to students: Arunachal Congress</span></b><br />
Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation: APCC<br />
| DAMIEN LEPCHA | ITANAGAR | August 12, 2018 9:58 pm<br />
disappointment over the recent statement made by Tibetan Spiritual Leader the 14th Dalai Lama in which he called Jawaharlal Nehru, the former Prime Minister of India as “self-centered” and the one responsible for parting India and Pakistan.<br />
“Although Dalai Lama expressed regret over his controversial comment, the APCC is extremely thwarted by it. A Tibetan spiritual leader calling names to an Indian leader who sweated most to keep him and his followers safe from Chinese aggression is simply not acceptable. Today, India is home to lakhs of Tibetan refugees who are living in 37 settlements and 70 scattered communities across different states of India,” APCC vice-president Minkir Lollen said in a statement on Sunday.<br />
“Dalai Lama may have forgotten that India provided a beam of light and hope to Tibetans remaining in Chinese-dominated Tibet and in the neighbouring Chinese provinces politically cut off from the Tibetan heart land. All these happened only because India has great leaders like Gandhi and Nehru who took the responsibility of social burden to shelter thousands of persecuted Tibetans then in 1959,” Lollen added.<br />
Minkir said Dalai Lama should know that a spiritual leader like him is shouldering great expectation, hope and trust of millions on record and the same are watching his contribution towards the mankind.<br />
“In such circumstances, Dalai Lama should abstain from imparting partial and controversial information to the students who are the torch bearer of the nation,” the Congress said.<br />
Further stating that the statement of the spiritual leader could be a politically motivated one and made with an effort to approach Prime Minister Narendra Modi for survival of his continuation in the country, the Congress said Dalai Lama being a foreigner should shun and refrain from interfering in the internal as well as external affairs of India.<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://nenow.in/north-east-news/dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.html" rel="nofollow">https://nenow.in/north-east-news/dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.html</a></q><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.png" title="Download: Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information.png" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Nenow-in-north-east-news-dalai-lama-should-abstain-from-imparting-controversial-information-129x300.png"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vardaniya</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-651394</link>
		<dc:creator>Vardaniya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-651394</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;The cracks in Tibetan society are starting to show, and it is now coming to the attention of local Indians who have all but identified the Tibetan leadership as the source of the divisions. According to this author, disunity amongst the Tibetans is now creating problems for Indian law enforcement agencies, and this disunity may culminate in young Tibetans holding silent grudges against their host country. It is incredible that after six decades of generosity from India, Indians are now facing the very real possibility Tibetans can be ungrateful towards India. The Tibetan leadership totally failed to impart positive values upon their exiled community, like gratitude for those kindest to them and the need to repay these kindnesses with real, tangible results. It’s also very unlikely that the Tibetan leadership will now start to do this, after six decades of failing to do so. Indians need to realise this, and see that there is no benefit for their nation to align themselves with the Tibetan leadership, and there never will be.&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;q&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:1.4em;color:red&quot;&gt;Tibetan disunity not in India’s interest&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
John S. Shilshi
Updated: August 7, 2018, 11:00 AM
India is home to the Dalai Lama and an estimated 120,000 Tibetan refugees. Though this humanitarian gesture on India’s part comes at the cost of risking New Delhi’s relations with China, India has never wavered in ensuring that Tibetans live with dignity and respect. Notified settlements across the country were made available so that they can live as independently as possible and practice Tibetan religion and culture. They are also allowed to establish centres of higher learning in Tibetan Buddhism. As a result, several reputed Buddhist institutes came up in Karnataka, and in the Indian Himalayan belt. In what may be termed as a gesture well reciprocated, and because of the respect and influence His Holiness the Dalai Lama commands, the Tibetan diaspora also lived as a peaceful community, rarely creating problems for India’s law enforcement agencies.
The situation, however, changed from 2000 onwards when unity amongst Tibetans suffered some setback due to developments like the Karmapa succession controversy and the controversy over worshiping of Dorje Shugden. In a unique case of politics getting the better of religion, two senior monks of the Karma kargyue sect of Tibetan Buddhism, Tai Situ Rinpoche and late Shamar Rinpoche, developed serious differences after the demise of Rangjung Rigpe Dorje, the 16th Karmapa, in 1981. This animosity ultimately led to emergence of two 17th Karmapa candidates in the early nineties. While Tai Situ Rinpoche identified and recognised UghyanThinley Dorje, late Shamar Rinpoche anointed Thinley Thaye Dorje as his Karmapa candidate. Enthronement of their respective protégés at the Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim, the supreme seat of the Karma Kargue linage, being their primary objective, both started indulging in activities monks normally are expected to, and bitterness spewed against each other.
The bitter rivalry assumed a new dimension when UghyenThinley Dorje suddenly appeared in India in January 2000. The competition became fiercer and hectic political lobbying, never known in the history of Tibetan Buddhism on Indian soil, became common place. Apart from pulling strings at their disposal in Sikkim as well as in the power corridors of New Delhi, these senior monks spat against each other with allegations and counter allegations, widening the gaps between their supporters. His Holiness the Dalai Lama, choosing to favour one of the candidates—a decision many Tibet watchers felt was ill-timed—had also limited possible scope of rapprochement. Hence, the Karma Kargyue followers are now vertically divided, while the camps are dragged into a long drawn legal battle.
Another development that unfortunately split the Tibetans is the controversy over Shugden worshipping, which again is an internal matter of the Gelugpa sect, to which the Dalai Lama belongs. It erupted as a result of the Dalai Lama urging Tibetans to refrain from worshiping Dorje Shugden, a deity believed to be a protector, according to Tibetan legend. Shugden practitioners, who felt offended by the call, describe it as an attack on freedom of religion, a right, which Dalai Lama himself tirelessly fought for. On the other hand, die hard Dalai Lama followers perceived the questioning of the decision as one challenging the wisdom of the Dalai Lama and mounted massive pressure on Dorje Shugden practitioners to relent, with some even demolishing the statues of the deity. The rivalry ultimately led to split in two Gelug monasteries in Karnataka, and Serpom and Shar Garden monasteries in Bylakupe and Mundgod respectively came under the control of Shugden followers. The bitterness associated with the split is exemplified by the fact that till today, members of these monasteries are treated as some sort of outcasts by the others. Thus, for the first time, the Tibetan diaspora in India gave birth to sections opposed to the Dalai Lama, with spillover effects in Tibet and elsewhere.
For India, with a fragile internal security profile, a divided Tibetan population on its soil is not good news. It has several long-term implications. It is common knowledge that China considers Dalai Lama as a secessionist, one plotting to divide their country. The latter’s claim of “all that Tibetans were asking for, was a status of genuine autonomy within the Constitution of the Peoples’ Republic of China”, had fallen into deaf ears. China also considers him as someone who plays to the Indian tune to tickle China. Therefore, at a time when China has successfully shrunk the Dalai Lama’s space internationally, India continuing to extend the usual space for him is viewed as complicity. Sharp reaction from China when he was allowed to visit Arunachal Pradesh in April 2017, is a recent example. Such being the delicate nature of India-China relations on matters and issues concerning Tibetans, India can hardly afford to ignore the division within the diaspora. Past experience of dubious elements from Tibet having succeeded in infiltrating the Central Tibetan Administration, including the security wing, should be a warning.
It is also time India understands the reason behind Tibetans seeking Indian passports, despite an existing arrangement for issue of Identity Certificates, which is passport equivalent. Some had even successfully taken recourse to legal remedy on the issue, and left the government of India red-faced. These changing moods should not be viewed as desires by Tibetans to become Indian citizens. They are triggered by the pathetic state of affairs associated with issuing of Identity Certificates, where delays in most cases are anything between six months to one year. Early streamlining of the process will drastically reduce their desire to hold Indian passport. It will also remove the wrongly perceived notion among some educated Tibetan youth, that the cumbersome process was a ploy by India to confine them in this country. While India should not shy from requesting the Dalai Lama to use his good offices to end all differences within the community in the interest of India’s internal security, it will also be necessary to ensure that young Tibetans do not nurse a silent grudge against the very country they called their second home.
https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest&lt;/q&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest.png&quot; title=&quot;Download: DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest-71x300.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>The cracks in Tibetan society are starting to show, and it is now coming to the attention of local Indians who have all but identified the Tibetan leadership as the source of the divisions. According to this author, disunity amongst the Tibetans is now creating problems for Indian law enforcement agencies, and this disunity may culminate in young Tibetans holding silent grudges against their host country. It is incredible that after six decades of generosity from India, Indians are now facing the very real possibility Tibetans can be ungrateful towards India. The Tibetan leadership totally failed to impart positive values upon their exiled community, like gratitude for those kindest to them and the need to repay these kindnesses with real, tangible results. It’s also very unlikely that the Tibetan leadership will now start to do this, after six decades of failing to do so. Indians need to realise this, and see that there is no benefit for their nation to align themselves with the Tibetan leadership, and there never will be.</b><br />
<q><b><span style="font-size:1.4em;color:red">Tibetan disunity not in India’s interest</span></b><br />
John S. Shilshi<br />
Updated: August 7, 2018, 11:00 AM<br />
India is home to the Dalai Lama and an estimated 120,000 Tibetan refugees. Though this humanitarian gesture on India’s part comes at the cost of risking New Delhi’s relations with China, India has never wavered in ensuring that Tibetans live with dignity and respect. Notified settlements across the country were made available so that they can live as independently as possible and practice Tibetan religion and culture. They are also allowed to establish centres of higher learning in Tibetan Buddhism. As a result, several reputed Buddhist institutes came up in Karnataka, and in the Indian Himalayan belt. In what may be termed as a gesture well reciprocated, and because of the respect and influence His Holiness the Dalai Lama commands, the Tibetan diaspora also lived as a peaceful community, rarely creating problems for India’s law enforcement agencies.<br />
The situation, however, changed from 2000 onwards when unity amongst Tibetans suffered some setback due to developments like the Karmapa succession controversy and the controversy over worshiping of Dorje Shugden. In a unique case of politics getting the better of religion, two senior monks of the Karma kargyue sect of Tibetan Buddhism, Tai Situ Rinpoche and late Shamar Rinpoche, developed serious differences after the demise of Rangjung Rigpe Dorje, the 16th Karmapa, in 1981. This animosity ultimately led to emergence of two 17th Karmapa candidates in the early nineties. While Tai Situ Rinpoche identified and recognised UghyanThinley Dorje, late Shamar Rinpoche anointed Thinley Thaye Dorje as his Karmapa candidate. Enthronement of their respective protégés at the Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim, the supreme seat of the Karma Kargue linage, being their primary objective, both started indulging in activities monks normally are expected to, and bitterness spewed against each other.<br />
The bitter rivalry assumed a new dimension when UghyenThinley Dorje suddenly appeared in India in January 2000. The competition became fiercer and hectic political lobbying, never known in the history of Tibetan Buddhism on Indian soil, became common place. Apart from pulling strings at their disposal in Sikkim as well as in the power corridors of New Delhi, these senior monks spat against each other with allegations and counter allegations, widening the gaps between their supporters. His Holiness the Dalai Lama, choosing to favour one of the candidates—a decision many Tibet watchers felt was ill-timed—had also limited possible scope of rapprochement. Hence, the Karma Kargyue followers are now vertically divided, while the camps are dragged into a long drawn legal battle.<br />
Another development that unfortunately split the Tibetans is the controversy over Shugden worshipping, which again is an internal matter of the Gelugpa sect, to which the Dalai Lama belongs. It erupted as a result of the Dalai Lama urging Tibetans to refrain from worshiping Dorje Shugden, a deity believed to be a protector, according to Tibetan legend. Shugden practitioners, who felt offended by the call, describe it as an attack on freedom of religion, a right, which Dalai Lama himself tirelessly fought for. On the other hand, die hard Dalai Lama followers perceived the questioning of the decision as one challenging the wisdom of the Dalai Lama and mounted massive pressure on Dorje Shugden practitioners to relent, with some even demolishing the statues of the deity. The rivalry ultimately led to split in two Gelug monasteries in Karnataka, and Serpom and Shar Garden monasteries in Bylakupe and Mundgod respectively came under the control of Shugden followers. The bitterness associated with the split is exemplified by the fact that till today, members of these monasteries are treated as some sort of outcasts by the others. Thus, for the first time, the Tibetan diaspora in India gave birth to sections opposed to the Dalai Lama, with spillover effects in Tibet and elsewhere.<br />
For India, with a fragile internal security profile, a divided Tibetan population on its soil is not good news. It has several long-term implications. It is common knowledge that China considers Dalai Lama as a secessionist, one plotting to divide their country. The latter’s claim of “all that Tibetans were asking for, was a status of genuine autonomy within the Constitution of the Peoples’ Republic of China”, had fallen into deaf ears. China also considers him as someone who plays to the Indian tune to tickle China. Therefore, at a time when China has successfully shrunk the Dalai Lama’s space internationally, India continuing to extend the usual space for him is viewed as complicity. Sharp reaction from China when he was allowed to visit Arunachal Pradesh in April 2017, is a recent example. Such being the delicate nature of India-China relations on matters and issues concerning Tibetans, India can hardly afford to ignore the division within the diaspora. Past experience of dubious elements from Tibet having succeeded in infiltrating the Central Tibetan Administration, including the security wing, should be a warning.<br />
It is also time India understands the reason behind Tibetans seeking Indian passports, despite an existing arrangement for issue of Identity Certificates, which is passport equivalent. Some had even successfully taken recourse to legal remedy on the issue, and left the government of India red-faced. These changing moods should not be viewed as desires by Tibetans to become Indian citizens. They are triggered by the pathetic state of affairs associated with issuing of Identity Certificates, where delays in most cases are anything between six months to one year. Early streamlining of the process will drastically reduce their desire to hold Indian passport. It will also remove the wrongly perceived notion among some educated Tibetan youth, that the cumbersome process was a ploy by India to confine them in this country. While India should not shy from requesting the Dalai Lama to use his good offices to end all differences within the community in the interest of India’s internal security, it will also be necessary to ensure that young Tibetans do not nurse a silent grudge against the very country they called their second home.<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest" rel="nofollow">https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/opinion/tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest</a></q><br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest.png" title="Download: DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest.png" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-Sundayguardianlive-Opinion-tibetan-disunity-not-indias-interest-71x300.png"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoezer</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-638066</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 15:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-638066</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;While the government of Nepal has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, they have welcomed 30 Chinese NGOs to enter the country. These NGOs will penetrate the country’s social sector at the grassroots level. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal at one time. Nepal is increasingly open to Chinese influence, a sign that ties between both countries are strengthening, while India&#039;s influence is being reduced. The time has passed for India’s monopoly to remain uninterrupted in Nepal as opportunities to engage with China are being welcomed.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;q&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:1.4em;color:red&quot;&gt;30 Chinese NGOs all set to work in Nepal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
REWATI SAPKOTA
Kathmandu, July 30
At a time when the government has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, 30 Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal to penetrate the country’s social sector and the grassroots.
The Social Welfare Council Nepal and China NGO Network for International Exchanges, an umbrella body of Chinese NGOs, have signed a memorandum of understanding to enable Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal. The agreement was signed yesterday between SWCN Member Secretary Dilli Prasad Bhatt and CNIE General Secretary Zhu Rui in the presence of Minister of Women, Children and Senior Citizen Tham Maya Thapa and Chinese Deputy Minister of External Affairs Wang Yajun.
The agreement has paved the way for the first batch of 30 Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal for a period of three years. Their contract will be extended based on the consent of SWCN and CNIE. Representatives of these 30 Chinese NGOs were also present during yesterday’s signing ceremony. They have agreed to work in partnership with local NGOs to implement their programmes and projects.
The Chinese NGOs are eyeing areas such as livelihood, healthcare, education, skill-based training, community development and disaster management. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs has entered Nepal at one time. The Chinese assistance so far in Nepal has largely been limited to development of infrastructure projects. But the entry of these NGOs indicates China is keen on making its presence felt in Nepal’s social sector and the grassroots, which, till date, have remained domains of the West and countries such as Japan and India.
The MoU signed between SWCN and CNIE states that Chinese NGOs will be mobilised for ‘the benefit of needy Nepalis and to enhance ties between China and Nepal through people-to-people support programmes’.
“The Chinese NGOs will abide by the law of Nepal in its entirety while carrying out development cooperation in Nepal,” says the MoU, adding, “Chinese NGOs will submit programmes to the SWCN to carry out development activities in partnership with Nepali NGOs and SWCN in line with plans and policies of the government of Nepal.”
The MoU was signed at a time when the government has drafted the National Integrity Policy to limit activities of NGOs and INGOs, as some of them were found ‘trying to break communal harmony and proselytising Nepalis’. There were also concerns that high administrative cost of many NGOs and INGOs was preventing money from reaching the real beneficiaries. The policy clearly states that NGOs and INGOs cannot spend more than specified amount under administrative and consultant headings. They will also be barred from working against Nepal’s interests, culture and communal harmony and conducting activities to promote their religious, social or other agenda, adds the policy.
Around 48,000 NGOs are currently registered in Nepal, of which only 1,600 have been receiving funds from INGOs, as per SWCN. The SWCN has directed INGOs and NGOs to spend 60 per cent of the budget to generate tangible results, while the remaining can be used to cover administrative costs and organise training, meetings and seminars.
https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/30-chinese-ngos-all-set-to-work-in-nepal/&lt;/q&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal.png&quot; title=&quot;Download: DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal-224x300.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>While the government of Nepal has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, they have welcomed 30 Chinese NGOs to enter the country. These NGOs will penetrate the country’s social sector at the grassroots level. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal at one time. Nepal is increasingly open to Chinese influence, a sign that ties between both countries are strengthening, while India&#8217;s influence is being reduced. The time has passed for India’s monopoly to remain uninterrupted in Nepal as opportunities to engage with China are being welcomed.</b></p>
<p><q><b><span style="font-size:1.4em;color:red">30 Chinese NGOs all set to work in Nepal</span></b><br />
REWATI SAPKOTA<br />
Kathmandu, July 30<br />
At a time when the government has framed a policy to tighten the noose around non-governmental organisations, 30 Chinese NGOs have entered Nepal to penetrate the country’s social sector and the grassroots.<br />
The Social Welfare Council Nepal and China NGO Network for International Exchanges, an umbrella body of Chinese NGOs, have signed a memorandum of understanding to enable Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal. The agreement was signed yesterday between SWCN Member Secretary Dilli Prasad Bhatt and CNIE General Secretary Zhu Rui in the presence of Minister of Women, Children and Senior Citizen Tham Maya Thapa and Chinese Deputy Minister of External Affairs Wang Yajun.<br />
The agreement has paved the way for the first batch of 30 Chinese NGOs to work in Nepal for a period of three years. Their contract will be extended based on the consent of SWCN and CNIE. Representatives of these 30 Chinese NGOs were also present during yesterday’s signing ceremony. They have agreed to work in partnership with local NGOs to implement their programmes and projects.<br />
The Chinese NGOs are eyeing areas such as livelihood, healthcare, education, skill-based training, community development and disaster management. This is the first time such a large number of Chinese NGOs has entered Nepal at one time. The Chinese assistance so far in Nepal has largely been limited to development of infrastructure projects. But the entry of these NGOs indicates China is keen on making its presence felt in Nepal’s social sector and the grassroots, which, till date, have remained domains of the West and countries such as Japan and India.<br />
The MoU signed between SWCN and CNIE states that Chinese NGOs will be mobilised for ‘the benefit of needy Nepalis and to enhance ties between China and Nepal through people-to-people support programmes’.<br />
“The Chinese NGOs will abide by the law of Nepal in its entirety while carrying out development cooperation in Nepal,” says the MoU, adding, “Chinese NGOs will submit programmes to the SWCN to carry out development activities in partnership with Nepali NGOs and SWCN in line with plans and policies of the government of Nepal.”<br />
The MoU was signed at a time when the government has drafted the National Integrity Policy to limit activities of NGOs and INGOs, as some of them were found ‘trying to break communal harmony and proselytising Nepalis’. There were also concerns that high administrative cost of many NGOs and INGOs was preventing money from reaching the real beneficiaries. The policy clearly states that NGOs and INGOs cannot spend more than specified amount under administrative and consultant headings. They will also be barred from working against Nepal’s interests, culture and communal harmony and conducting activities to promote their religious, social or other agenda, adds the policy.<br />
Around 48,000 NGOs are currently registered in Nepal, of which only 1,600 have been receiving funds from INGOs, as per SWCN. The SWCN has directed INGOs and NGOs to spend 60 per cent of the budget to generate tangible results, while the remaining can be used to cover administrative costs and organise training, meetings and seminars.<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/30-chinese-ngos-all-set-to-work-in-nepal/" rel="nofollow">https://thehimalayantimes.com/nepal/30-chinese-ngos-all-set-to-work-in-nepal/</a></q></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal.png" title="Download: DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal.png" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/DS.com-China-NGOs-enter-Nepal-224x300.png"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ojas</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/tibetan-leadership-sabotages-indian-citizenship/comment-page-2/#comment-632929</link>
		<dc:creator>Ojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dorjeshugden.com/?p=54866#comment-632929</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Supreme Court of India &lt;font color=#cc4125 class=&quot;bbcode-color&quot;&gt;JUSTICE Mr. MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD)&lt;/font&gt; writes that Tibet is much better under the Chinese than it was under the lamas who only wanted to make the populace slaves. It was feudal and it will never return to the backwardness again.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;q&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:1.4em;color:red&quot;&gt;Time has come to acknowledge that Tibet has vastly improved under Chinese rule&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/b&gt;
JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD) &#124; 12 August, 2018
From a terribly poor state hinged on a feudal system, Tibet has modernised and grows faster than the rest of China
This article has been prompted by Jyoti Malhotra’s article in ThePrint ‘Tibetan government quietly changed its PM’s designation. India won’t be unhappy about it‘.
China’s annexation of Tibet in 1959, ousting the Dalai Lama, had attracted it worldwide criticism. The Dalai Lama fled and was granted asylum in India, where he set up a government-in-exile with its headquarters in Dharamshala.
The Chinese claim Tibet on the grounds that it has been part of the country since the Yuan dynasty of the 13th century, which is disputed by the government-in-exile. But let us leave this that matter aside.
The more important question is whether Chinese rule has benefited Tibet.
The answer is that it undoubtedly has. As the Reuters’ Ben Blanchard writes: “Today Tibet is richer and more developed than it has ever been, its people healthier, more literate, better dressed and fed”.
Although Ben goes on to argue that this development masks “a deep sense of unhappiness among many Tibetans”, I will disagree. How can anyone be unhappy if s/he is healthier, better fed and better clothed?
Under the rule of the Dalai Lamas (Buddhist priests), the people of Tibet were terribly poor, almost entirely illiterate, and lived like feudal serfs.
Today, Tibet presents a totally different picture. The illiteracy rate in Tibet has gone down from 95 per cent in the 1950s to 42 per cent in 2000. It has modern schools, universities, engineering and medical colleges, modern hospitals, freeways, supermarkets, fast food restaurants, mobile stores and apartment buildings. The capital Lhasa is like any other modern city.
While the economic growth in the rest of China has slowed down to about 7 per cent, Tibet has had a 10 per cent growth rate in the last two decades.
Tibet has huge mineral wealth, which was only awaiting Chinese technology to be tapped. Nowadays, it has numerous hydro and solar power plants and industries running with Chinese help.
Tibetan literature is flourishing, contrary to claims that the Chinese want to crush Tibetan culture.
Of course, now the lamas cannot treat their people as slaves.
The so-called ‘government-in-exile’, of which Lobsang Sangay claims to be the President, is a fake organisation, funded by foreign countries. They only want to restore the feudal Tibet, ruled by the reactionary lamas, something which will never happen.
&lt;em class=&quot;bbcode-em&quot;&gt;The writer is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India&lt;/em&gt;
https://theprint.in/opinion/time-has-come-to-acknowledge-that-tibet-has-vastly-improved-under-chinese-rule/97172/&lt;/q&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TimeHasCome.png&quot; title=&quot;Download: TimeHasCome.png&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TimeHasCome-248x300.png&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Supreme Court of India <font color=#cc4125 class="bbcode-color">JUSTICE Mr. MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD)</font> writes that Tibet is much better under the Chinese than it was under the lamas who only wanted to make the populace slaves. It was feudal and it will never return to the backwardness again.</b></p>
<p><q><b><span style="font-size:1.4em;color:red">Time has come to acknowledge that Tibet has vastly improved under Chinese rule</span></b><br />
JUSTICE MARKANDEY KATJU (RETD) | 12 August, 2018<br />
From a terribly poor state hinged on a feudal system, Tibet has modernised and grows faster than the rest of China<br />
This article has been prompted by Jyoti Malhotra’s article in ThePrint ‘Tibetan government quietly changed its PM’s designation. India won’t be unhappy about it‘.<br />
China’s annexation of Tibet in 1959, ousting the Dalai Lama, had attracted it worldwide criticism. The Dalai Lama fled and was granted asylum in India, where he set up a government-in-exile with its headquarters in Dharamshala.<br />
The Chinese claim Tibet on the grounds that it has been part of the country since the Yuan dynasty of the 13th century, which is disputed by the government-in-exile. But let us leave this that matter aside.<br />
The more important question is whether Chinese rule has benefited Tibet.<br />
The answer is that it undoubtedly has. As the Reuters’ Ben Blanchard writes: “Today Tibet is richer and more developed than it has ever been, its people healthier, more literate, better dressed and fed”.<br />
Although Ben goes on to argue that this development masks “a deep sense of unhappiness among many Tibetans”, I will disagree. How can anyone be unhappy if s/he is healthier, better fed and better clothed?<br />
Under the rule of the Dalai Lamas (Buddhist priests), the people of Tibet were terribly poor, almost entirely illiterate, and lived like feudal serfs.<br />
Today, Tibet presents a totally different picture. The illiteracy rate in Tibet has gone down from 95 per cent in the 1950s to 42 per cent in 2000. It has modern schools, universities, engineering and medical colleges, modern hospitals, freeways, supermarkets, fast food restaurants, mobile stores and apartment buildings. The capital Lhasa is like any other modern city.<br />
While the economic growth in the rest of China has slowed down to about 7 per cent, Tibet has had a 10 per cent growth rate in the last two decades.<br />
Tibet has huge mineral wealth, which was only awaiting Chinese technology to be tapped. Nowadays, it has numerous hydro and solar power plants and industries running with Chinese help.<br />
Tibetan literature is flourishing, contrary to claims that the Chinese want to crush Tibetan culture.<br />
Of course, now the lamas cannot treat their people as slaves.<br />
The so-called ‘government-in-exile’, of which Lobsang Sangay claims to be the President, is a fake organisation, funded by foreign countries. They only want to restore the feudal Tibet, ruled by the reactionary lamas, something which will never happen.<br />
<em class="bbcode-em">The writer is a former judge of the Supreme Court of India</em><br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://theprint.in/opinion/time-has-come-to-acknowledge-that-tibet-has-vastly-improved-under-chinese-rule/97172/" rel="nofollow">https://theprint.in/opinion/time-has-come-to-acknowledge-that-tibet-has-vastly-improved-under-chinese-rule/97172/</a></q></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TimeHasCome.png" title="Download: TimeHasCome.png" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/TimeHasCome-248x300.png"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
