Comments on: Tibet Sun newspaper highlights Dalai Lama’s discrimination against Shugden Practitioners

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 03 Dec 2017 21:22:22 +0000

By: SabrinaS

SabrinaS — Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:01:25 +0000

I would have said Kudos to the Tibetan Sun on exposing the blatant discrimination practised by the Dalai Lama on the Shugden practitioners but I guess it too faced the wrath of the Dalai Lama and his political influence as the article had to be removed. I just find it amazing that the Indian Government, a country who practises religious freedom and acceptance could close their eyes at such an abuse without any actions. What more, to allow the Dalai Lama to practise such injustice at Bodhgaya, one of the holiest sites, where Buddha Shakyamuni gained enlightenment! The Dalai Lama’s turning the Wheel of Dharma at this holy pilgrimage site would have been auspicious but he had to taint the place with discrimination. Totally against Buddha’s teaching of equality and equanimity. I hope that many people had read the Tibetan Sun’s article before being forced to be removed. May the illegal ban on Protector’s Dorje Shugden’s practise be swiftly lifted and the rights of the practitioners be restored.

By: Arisa

Arisa — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 06:54:06 +0000

Newspapers are very good for exposing good news or bad news if they are not censored. Newspaper company is not a spiritual organisation but only perform as a business to secure finances. I believe the Sun newspaper would have paid a substantial sum to the newspaper company to highlight the Dalai Lama’s discrimination against Dorje Shugden Practitioners. This is the only way to show and let the people think and decide what the Dalai Lama does is right or wrong. In the newspaper article it says the Dalai Lama’s public talks was open to everyone including those in other Religions except Dorje Shugden Practitioners who are also in the same Religion as the Dalai Lama. Tibetan Government has even gone against the law set up by the Indian government which says that there be freedom of religious practice.