<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China’s Involvement in the Dorje Shugden Controversy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/chinas-involvement-in-the-dorje-shugden-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/chinas-involvement-in-the-dorje-shugden-controversy/</link>
	<description>The Protector whose time has come</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 18:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSFriend</title>
		<link>http://www.dorjeshugden.com/all-articles/the-controversy/chinas-involvement-in-the-dorje-shugden-controversy/comment-page-1/#comment-15999</link>
		<dc:creator>DSFriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dorjeshugden.com/wp/?p=6743#comment-15999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just wondering, hypothetically, if Dalai Lama is not around anymore (with respect) will the dividing line between pro-shugden and anti-shugden be such a big deal?! Afterall, Tibet is on China&#039;s land with a ruling body in exile on Indian soil. As far as I know, China is allowing Buddhist practice to continue and from this article, china is even supporting the monasteries. Yes, of course the ongoing debate is that China is taking the stance to support shugden practitioners for political reasons. But seriously, does China really need to do this in order to have &quot;control&quot; over Tibet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering, hypothetically, if Dalai Lama is not around anymore (with respect) will the dividing line between pro-shugden and anti-shugden be such a big deal?! Afterall, Tibet is on China&#8217;s land with a ruling body in exile on Indian soil. As far as I know, China is allowing Buddhist practice to continue and from this article, china is even supporting the monasteries. Yes, of course the ongoing debate is that China is taking the stance to support shugden practitioners for political reasons. But seriously, does China really need to do this in order to have &#8220;control&#8221; over Tibet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
